User contributions for CycoMa1

A user with 26,371 edits. Account created on 3 January 2020.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 May 2024

10 May 2024

9 May 2024

8 May 2024

7 May 2024

6 May 2024

5 May 2024

4 May 2024

3 May 2024

2 May 2024

1 May 2024

30 April 2024

29 April 2024

27 April 2024

26 April 2024

25 April 2024

24 April 2024

23 April 2024

22 April 2024

21 April 2024

20 April 2024

18 April 2024

16 April 2024

  • 18:5718:57, 16 April 2024 diff hist +144 YahwehI decided to in-line these. These sources are currently 50 years old. I doubt all the opinions hold up today. I think more recent sources would be ideal. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 16:5216:52, 16 April 2024 diff hist +2 YahwehJust decided to move this to the bottom. It ruined the flow and structure of the other 2 sentences. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 16:1616:16, 16 April 2024 diff hist +29 MonolatryJust marking it as original research just in case. I have a feeling there is a good amount of here. Like paragraphs 2 and 4 only cite the Bible. Many of the scholarly sources here don’t cite the page numbers. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 16:0816:08, 16 April 2024 diff hist +117 MonolatryA lot of the sources here do not site the exact page numbers. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

15 April 2024

  • 20:3520:35, 15 April 2024 diff hist −165 YahwismAgain with what I said earlier. I forgot to remove this one Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 15:3815:38, 15 April 2024 diff hist −109 YahwismOkay, I have said something very similar to what I said on the Yahweh. The entire book argues against this view. Also, this view has been abandoned by most scholars. Who ever added this clearly didn't read the book. Tag: Visual edit
  • 05:4705:47, 15 April 2024 diff hist −33 YahwehOkay this here is kinda missing the context of the source. This claim is from proposals of the original profile of YHWH. Some of these proposals contradict each other. Not to mention, many parts of the book don’t use the word divine warrior as being war god, some cases it is used to describe a protector. Overall the book doesn’t read as “this is the consensus, that he is this.” Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 05:0105:01, 15 April 2024 diff hist −185 YahwehPlease tell me you’re joking here. He is clearly not a river or sea god. Tag: Visual edit

14 April 2024

13 April 2024

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)