User contributions for 98.206.14.11
For 98.206.14.11 talk block log logs filter log
4 June 2024
- 22:1522:15, 4 June 2024 diff hist +521 Frank Herbert →Dune: Noting that the opening of the section, at least, violates WP:OR and WP:VERIFY. Only one tag is placed, and opening sentences that are non-sky-is-blue factual are marked as examples of the violations. current
- 21:5621:56, 4 June 2024 diff hist +143 The Godmakers (novel) NOTE, DESPITE POSSIBLE BOT INFORMATION TO THE CONTRARY, this edit was in compliance with WP:LEAD and WP:VER. The only edit performed was to note that content was appearing in the lead but not in the main body, so it was copied there, and in both places its lack of sourcing noted.
- 21:5121:51, 4 June 2024 diff hist +495 The Godmakers (novel) →Summary: Seaprating plot summary, which does not, apart from lifted quotes, require inline citations, and the publication origin/history information, which requires sources throughout.
- 21:4321:43, 4 June 2024 diff hist +156 The Godmakers (novel) →Reception: Noting the need for more than one review, especially in the case of an ill report by a second tier author in the same genre.
- 00:4800:48, 4 June 2024 diff hist −1 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies →Correction needed.: Copy edit. Correction of S-V agreement. current
- 00:4800:48, 4 June 2024 diff hist 0 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies →Correction needed.: Copy edit. Letters translocated to correct spelling.
- 00:4600:46, 4 June 2024 diff hist −8 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies →Correction needed.: Copy edit. Removed extraneous word and letter.
- 00:4500:45, 4 June 2024 diff hist +1 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies →Correction needed.: Copy edit. Inserted missing apostrophe.
- 00:4400:44, 4 June 2024 diff hist −1 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies →Correction needed.: Copy edit. Verb tense.
- 00:4200:42, 4 June 2024 diff hist −17 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies Removed inexplicable, unlinked, unexplained "Pure Team Global" phrase from apppearing in the Talk text.
- 00:4100:41, 4 June 2024 diff hist +1,556 Talk:List of multi-level marketing companies →Correction needed.: new section Tag: New topic
- 00:2700:27, 4 June 2024 diff hist +314 The Body Shop →The Body Shop at Home: direct sales, multilevel marketing channel: Shortened section title, and restructured/integrated material on United Kingdom and Australia channels chronologically. Called for update of the section and improvement of its sources (better, rather than more citations).
1 June 2024
- 04:1804:18, 1 June 2024 diff hist +50 Aconitum Finally, making clear that lack of citations, and the lack of the proper types of citations, is an issue for the article on the whole. Even the Taxonomy section, which is among the best here, is primary source-driven. Other sections are just unsourced editorial spouting.
- 04:1304:13, 1 June 2024 diff hist +41 Aconitum →Horticultural trade morphology: See erlier edit summaries regarding the pervasiveness of this WP:OR and editorialising. Cite sources! We are not to be the authorities here.
- 04:0804:08, 1 June 2024 diff hist +351 Talk:Aconitum No edit summary current
- 04:0604:06, 1 June 2024 diff hist −1 Talk:Aconitum →Please begin to monotor this article for compliance with WP policies and guidelines
- 04:0604:06, 1 June 2024 diff hist +1 Talk:Aconitum →Please begin to monotor this article for compliance with WP policies and guidelines
- 04:0504:05, 1 June 2024 diff hist −3 Talk:Aconitum →Please begin to monotor this article for compliance with WP policies and guidelines
- 04:0504:05, 1 June 2024 diff hist +23 Talk:Aconitum →Please begin to monotor this article for compliance with WP policies and guidelines
- 04:0404:04, 1 June 2024 diff hist +55 Talk:Aconitum →Please begin to monotor this article for compliance with WP policies and guidelines
- 04:0404:04, 1 June 2024 diff hist +1,144 Talk:Aconitum New comment on need for article attention, to prevent WP:VERIFY and WP:OR edits
- 03:4703:47, 1 June 2024 diff hist +11 Aconitum →20th century and later: Copy edit. Removed an improperly formatted quotation, moving it to a blockquote. Corrected an introductory sentence to accurate, as content following was not limited to aconitum as a fictional poison.
- 03:3803:38, 1 June 2024 diff hist −1 Aconitum →Early examples: Swapped two citation tags so that they appear in the proper order.
- 03:3503:35, 1 June 2024 diff hist +459 Aconitum →As a poison: Corrected access information for the cited Nature article, and then corrected the content of the sentence to source, clarifying that one book review in a science journal does not establish a preponderant historical view. Secondary historical sources are required.
- 02:5702:57, 1 June 2024 diff hist +3 Aconitum →In history and popular culture: Corrected this section title, as there is also a substantial historical section above.
- 02:5302:53, 1 June 2024 diff hist −13 Aconitum Copyedit: corrected a {{cite book... mistake, rectifying a red-label error warning.
- 02:4902:49, 1 June 2024 diff hist +1,192 Aconitum →Taxonomy: NOTE, however bots respond, NO MATERIAL ADDED UNSOURCED, things just moved about. Cleaned up existing citations. Literature mentions aren't Taxonomy, so those are split out into a separate section. Dividing aconitum and wolfsbane lit refs is likewise incorrect; they are synonyms for same naturally derived poison. The historical-cultural material is .: combined, and ordered chronologically by production date. Most all content, however, is just more WP:OR, violating WP:VERIFY.
- 01:0901:09, 1 June 2024 diff hist +45 Aconitum →Toxicology: One paragraph unsourced here.
- 01:0701:07, 1 June 2024 diff hist +39 Aconitum →Cultivation: Same comment as last; first subsection needs sources. None is sky-is-blue obvious.
- 01:0501:05, 1 June 2024 diff hist +41 Aconitum →Description: None of this section is sky-is-blue information. So essentially the whole section of WP:OR, self-published work of some editor deciding to ignore WP:VERIFY.
31 May 2024
- 20:5020:50, 31 May 2024 diff hist +27 Rey Ramsey Noting that most information here is over a decade old. current
30 May 2024
- 13:1613:16, 30 May 2024 diff hist −1 Millard Fuller →Recognition: Copy edit. Removed an unnecessary carriage return that had separated a citation from its sentence. Note, the {{refimprove}} issue noted for the one paragraph above is a general problem of the article. It appears that the text was posted en masse, unsourced, and that sourcing has begun after-the-fact, leading to sparse sourcing with incomplete coverage. Whole blocks of material are suspect in terms of WP:VER, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV. current
- 13:1313:13, 30 May 2024 diff hist +161 Millard Fuller →Koinonia Farm
25 May 2024
- 05:2605:26, 25 May 2024 diff hist +972 Klaus Barbie →Extradition, trial and death: Still checking and completing appearing sources. Completed the Eytan, Saxon, and L'avocat de la terreur citations. Noting a variety of places where incomplete information makes information unverifiable, or where poorer than scholarly sources are used to support appearing information.
- 04:3004:30, 25 May 2024 diff hist +209 Klaus Barbie →Extradition, trial and death: Noting that important purported factual, non-sky-is-ble statements are, as presented, not verifiable (and so violate WP:VER).
- 04:2704:27, 25 May 2024 diff hist +54 Klaus Barbie →Extradition, trial and death: This important subject deserves sources better than self-published blogs at AOL.
- 04:1604:16, 25 May 2024 diff hist +471 Maria Altmann Adding the superb source, Renold, Chechi, Bandle & Renold (2013), at Platform ArThemis (unige.ch/art-adr), to further readong, so it might be further extracted to improve this and other articles.
- 04:1404:14, 25 May 2024 diff hist +223 Maria Altmann →Background to the Klimt case: Completed the Platform ArThemis (unige.ch/art-adr) citation.
- 04:1104:11, 25 May 2024 diff hist +24 Maria Altmann →Background to the Klimt case: Noting that there is no external link to any Supreme Court case.
- 04:0204:02, 25 May 2024 diff hist −24 Maria Altmann →Early life: Copy edit. Removed duplicated markup language.
- 04:0104:01, 25 May 2024 diff hist +348 Maria Altmann Noting that the period photograph attributed to Altmann nee Bloch-Bauer contains no metadata / information linking it to the title subject, and thus could be anyone (or indeed, if of the title subject, is WP:OR, or worse, plagiarised).
- 03:4803:48, 25 May 2024 diff hist +890 Maria Altmann Completed the Glaberson NYT citation, and the Collins book citation, removing its repeated reference entries for a single complete one (though all mentions need page numbers). Otherwise, there are far too many violations of WP:VERIFY and WP:OR. Non-sky-is-blue historical material cannot be based on editor knowledge. Fact by fact it must be supported by third-party, independent sources.
- 02:3402:34, 25 May 2024 diff hist +50 Klaus Barbie →Manhunt: Noting another entire paragraph purporting non-sky-is-blue facts that are presented without sources.
21 May 2024
- 12:0812:08, 21 May 2024 diff hist +31 Hock Tan The 3-6 year datedness of the information of this article is a lifetime in business... (3 years in terms of most recent references, 6 years in terms of the lead and compensation information).
- 02:0102:01, 21 May 2024 diff hist +18 User talk:Melcous →TY for recent attention
- 02:0002:00, 21 May 2024 diff hist +1 User talk:Melcous →TY for recent attention
- 02:0002:00, 21 May 2024 diff hist +774 User talk:Melcous →Flagging statements about whether someone was a signatory to a letter as "possibly WP:UNDUE"
- 00:5900:59, 21 May 2024 diff hist −4,644 Miroslav Volf Undid revision 1224879190 by 98.206.14.11 (talk). Undoing because I inadvertently overwrote an edit conflict. Tag: Undo
- 00:5800:58, 21 May 2024 diff hist +4,644 Miroslav Volf Moved section issues to top of article. Whole of article is at issue. Also marking completely unsourced sections. See last edit summary regarding the overaching major issues of unsourced content, the preponderant use of self-authored sources (where ones professional workplace bios and CVs are self-authored), and its leaning, as a consequence, toward adulatory rather than objective and encyclopeic. [Is this written by a former student of the article subject?] Tag: Reverted
- 00:2800:28, 21 May 2024 diff hist +266 Miroslav Volf I'm saddened, apologetic but moved to post this edit. While deeply respecting Volf and his work, I fault the current, overall article content—so much written other than from stated sources—and its tone, which leans very much toward adulatory/promotional, rather than objective. Articles are often written by those who believe in their subjects, so supportive content is understandable. In this case a line is crossed. Remove unsourced. Impersonalise. Rewrite per third-party, independent sources, Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
19 May 2024
- 15:3415:34, 19 May 2024 diff hist +256 Heretics of Dune →Reception: Added the Kirkus review as Further reading, to initiate that section, so that furthrr sources may be presented there for inclusion in the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:3215:32, 19 May 2024 diff hist −237 Heretics of Dune →Reception: Removed duplicate full citation. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:3115:31, 19 May 2024 diff hist +199 Heretics of Dune Added a sourced statement from the article relevant to the lead summary. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:2515:25, 19 May 2024 diff hist +249 Heretics of Dune →Plot summary: Added source to statement in plot summary. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:1515:15, 19 May 2024 diff hist +565 Heretics of Dune →Reception: Added a Kirkus review to the section on the novel's reception. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:5414:54, 19 May 2024 diff hist +116 Heretics of Dune →Characters: First of two edits to create a section of the novel's characters. See next edit. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:5014:50, 19 May 2024 diff hist +36 Heretics of Dune →Plot summary: Noting, in accord with article tags, that this section is far too long. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:4914:49, 19 May 2024 diff hist −54 Heretics of Dune Revised content of lead rewrite tag in light of recent restructuring edits. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:3314:33, 19 May 2024 diff hist +17 Heretics of Dune Second edit to begin to move the lead into a form that actually summarizes the content of the article. This was accomplished by moving the earlier lead's plot summary material (long second paragraph) into the actual plot summary section. This will create redundancies there, but it's best that the lead be valid and compliant; redundancies in the plot summary section existed even before this addition, and all can be rectified there together. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:3014:30, 19 May 2024 diff hist +18 Heretics of Dune →Expanded plot summary: First of two edits to remove non-lead content from lead. Please do not revert until you see the second edit. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:2614:26, 19 May 2024 diff hist −1 Heretics of Dune copy edit, removed extraneous space Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:2414:24, 19 May 2024 diff hist +2 Heretics of Dune copy edit, corrected mistyped character Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:2314:23, 19 May 2024 diff hist +223 Heretics of Dune Noting failure of lead in serving as a summary of source-based factual content regarding a best-selling book Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 03:0903:09, 19 May 2024 diff hist +42 Rebecca Root →Biography: WP:VER/WP:OR violations. Someone is presenting information they know as encyclopedic. The first paragraph is not sky-is-blue, and so requires a basis in sources. Likewise the closing sentence. At same time, the presented citations should be checked that they actually support content appearing. Often, when citations are added late, they do not properly cover the content of the sentences to which they are affixed. current
15 May 2024
- 03:3403:34, 15 May 2024 diff hist +375 Agatha Christie's Marple Finally, noting that most release dates for DVD media are poorly sourced.
- 03:2603:26, 15 May 2024 diff hist +236 Agatha Christie's Marple →Ratings: Hid the barb.co.uk web link, because it goes to the hope page of a website, and not to any relevant information about any statement of section content. Otherwise noting that apart from that faux source, there is no traceable, verifiable citation for these purported factual, historic, non-sky-is-blue table entries. When correcting, also please make explicit/clear, which of the various productions/airings/audiences, to which the viewerships numbers pertain, please.
- 03:1903:19, 15 May 2024 diff hist +417 Agatha Christie's Marple →Location: And again and again. (Besides the citations needed, an issue of a run-on sentence, which cannot be deciphered without source, is marked by an in-text (<!--, etc.) note.
- 03:0703:07, 15 May 2024 diff hist +41 Agatha Christie's Marple →Worldwide distribution: And bloody again.
- 03:0603:06, 15 May 2024 diff hist +187 Agatha Christie's Marple →Awards and nominations: Noting another pair of purported factual, non sky-is-blue sentences, as being unsourced.
- 03:0303:03, 15 May 2024 diff hist +31 Agatha Christie's Marple Making clear the issue of poor/absent sourcing is systemic and serious.
- 03:0003:00, 15 May 2024 diff hist +39 Agatha Christie's Marple →Recurring characters: We are allowing this subject of Agatha Christie works to devolve into a second place for IMDB and blog-type originsl research publication. Is no registered editor with commitment to WP:VER attending here?
- 02:5702:57, 15 May 2024 diff hist +163 Agatha Christie's Marple →Plot outline: Noting a non-plot statement that requires a source.
- 02:5402:54, 15 May 2024 diff hist +65 A Caribbean Mystery →Publication history: Noting this too is unsourced WP:OR.
- 02:5102:51, 15 May 2024 diff hist +217 A Caribbean Mystery →Literary significance and reception: Slight reordering of reviews so that they are in the order of appearance, and edit to 1990 appreciation sentence, to make clear it was not a contemporaneous review. Moved longer quotes to blockquote format.
- 02:4302:43, 15 May 2024 diff hist 0 A Caribbean Mystery →Literary significance and reception: Hiding book wrapper laudations from sight, until they are turned into prose and properly sourced. Articles as dumbing grounds for edits violating WP:VERIFY need to cease here.
- 02:4002:40, 15 May 2024 diff hist +74 A Caribbean Mystery Returned three 2018 {{cn}} tags improperly removed by Prairieplant on 2 August 2022, and added the overarching article refimprove tag.
- 02:3102:31, 15 May 2024 diff hist +1,489 A Caribbean Mystery →Adaptations: NO MATERIAL ADDED UNSOURCED; WORK CALLS ATTENTION TO PRE-EXISTING UNSOURCED CONTENT—frankly, the whole bloody non-ecyclopedic mess. (Entire section violates both WP:VERIFY and WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH.) A registered editor should move content to Talk, delete whole thing, and state why—so editor committed to WIkipedia principle of verifiability can begin again. Note, otherwise, edited to move late insertions into relevant points in chronology, and hid IMDB citations as improper.
- 01:5201:52, 15 May 2024 diff hist +24 A Caribbean Mystery →References in other works: WP:OR noted. We don't speak from ur knowledge experience, as bloggers do. We write from sources.
14 May 2024
- 20:0120:01, 14 May 2024 diff hist 0 Tramadol Moved the natural product controversy to the chemistry section, as that is the nature of its sources, and the proper context for the argument.
- 19:5819:58, 14 May 2024 diff hist 0 Tramadol →Discrepant reports on natural agency: Copy edit. Corrected date in text to publication date of appended source.
- 19:5419:54, 14 May 2024 diff hist +606 User talk:A876 →ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
- 19:4319:43, 14 May 2024 diff hist +272 Tramadol Returning an inadvertently omitted full citation, rectifying the red markup warning.
- 19:3819:38, 14 May 2024 diff hist +814 Tramadol →False findings about sources in nature: Rewrote the section on the natural product controversy, and (despite agreeing with Spiteller), de-escalated the rhetoric, acknowledging the matter as unsettled by primary sources alone, a matter of philosophy of science. The one primary source on the radiocarbon results does not ultimately prove/confirm anything. We need to be careful and tight in our use of language, esp. based only on a trio of conflicting primary research reports.
13 May 2024
- 23:3823:38, 13 May 2024 diff hist +1,934 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Added Impact section based on Spiegel content. Adjusted article tags—remaining issue is lack of independent, secondary science sources. Also, article lacks reporting re: EUMA, MHRA, and ROW, so globalisation needed. Moved tagline from article title to quote. (It's not formally part of title at Spiegel source.) Expanded interview-derived quote putting tagline in context. [Editors, feel free to edit quote to for brevity].
- 19:2119:21, 13 May 2024 diff hist +703 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Career: Added job title at NovoNordisk, as of December 2015 (with citation of course). Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
- 19:1819:18, 13 May 2024 diff hist +437 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Further reading: Completed the Aarhus University citation in Further reading. Tags: possible BLP issue or vandalism possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 19:1319:13, 13 May 2024 diff hist +368 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Further reading: Completed the Underwood JBC reference in further reading. Tags: possible unreferenced addition to BLP Disambiguation links added
- 19:0819:08, 13 May 2024 diff hist +551 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Adding Further reading, to re-add sources lost during German-English translation. Please note, edit summaries for last several edits should have referred to removal of inline TAGS, not inline citations. In re: repeatedly bot insinuations: NO CITATIONS WERE REMOVED FROM ARTICLE, but in instituting {{reflist}} mechanism, redundancies were eliminated. Also, several citations were corrected (in presenting full citation info), and several were marked as inadequate. Again, no citations were removed..
- 18:4918:49, 13 May 2024 diff hist −42 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Removed article tag for citation completeness, after completing work on citations currently appearing.
- 18:4818:48, 13 May 2024 diff hist +835 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Contributions: Completed two FDA citations, noting inadequacy of second (Wegovy press release), and need for update to include 4 later indication/dose approvals, see https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=BasicSearch.process, searching "215256" (NDA number). Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 18:1918:19, 13 May 2024 diff hist +614 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Honors: Corrected the Monecke Medical-Tribune.de and completed the JOURNALMED.DE citations, and removed unnecessary inline citations. The latter is a registration-only access, so needs to be replaced, or verification of content ascribed to citation by the WikiProject Medicine team is required. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 17:5917:59, 13 May 2024 diff hist −2 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Contributions: Copy edit. Correction to citation markup to allow proper presentation.
- 17:5717:57, 13 May 2024 diff hist +316 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Contributions: Completed the Dolgin Nature citation, and removed two inline citations. Another subscription-only access, needs verification of content ascribed to citation by the WikiProject Medicine team. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 17:4817:48, 13 May 2024 diff hist +460 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Made date presentations uniform via {{use dmy dates}] markup, and completed the Knudsen and Drucker journal citations.
- 17:2417:24, 13 May 2024 diff hist +60 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen →Contributions: Completed the Molteni STAT citation, and removed two inline tags.
- 17:1917:19, 13 May 2024 diff hist +132 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Noting the systematic issues with the article, in an article tag. Will turn to completing sources, next.
- 17:1617:16, 13 May 2024 diff hist −6 Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Converted Refs to {{reflist}} format. Separated Early life..., Career §'s. ID'd statements supported by 1 appearing independent, 3rd-party source. Noted 2 sources inappropriate to content they intended to support. Autobiographical statements of article subjects are inappropriate as sole WP:BIO writing sources, and claims to primacy of discovery are not based on a subject's own publications. ("I discovered X first..." cannot replace 3rd-party source consensus stating "She discovered X first...".) Tag: references removed