Handicap principle: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 05:0605:06, 25 May 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 31,844 bytes +113‎ Add: url, doi-access, pmid, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar undo
curprev 00:1600:16, 25 May 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ m 31,731 bytes −25‎ add publisher doi to preprint doi (url to preprint is redundant) undo

curprev 03:1903:19, 25 April 2024‎ Shyamal talk contribs‎ 31,756 bytes +17‎ Zahavi's terminology is signal selection undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 02:5802:58, 25 April 2024‎ Shyamal talk contribs‎ 31,739 bytes 0‎ →‎Origins undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 02:5202:52, 25 April 2024‎ Shyamal talk contribs‎ 31,739 bytes +36‎ This is wrong! Signal selection and mate choice is what it would be which Darwin had called as "sexual selection"... undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 17:5617:56, 24 April 2024‎ Chiswick Chap talk contribs‎ 31,703 bytes +9‎ I'm afraid that its disputed status is easily the best-known thing about it, and the refs show that. If you'd prefer, we could say "intensely disputed" which is certainly accurate. Few hypotheses in biology have a nothing like the same status, read the article undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 16:3616:36, 24 April 2024‎ Shyamal talk contribs‎ 31,694 bytes −3‎ if it weren't disputed it would be a "law" not a hypothesis, also what's with citing so many old papers for just one adjective? undo Tag: Visual edit