User contributions for Sredmash

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:3218:32, 30 May 2024 diff hist +54‎ Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) ‎ Rephrasing intro, will add source for list of chemical composition soon [Sich thesis] current
18:2118:21, 30 May 2024 diff hist −85‎ Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) ‎ Reordering list to focus on primary 'ingredients.' Graphite is not to be found in the foot, although it no doubt contains some carbon from that source
18:1818:18, 30 May 2024 diff hist +392‎ N User talk:96.60.10.92 ‎ →‎Elephant's foot edits: new section current Tag: New topic

23:4223:42, 26 May 2024 diff hist −15‎ Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) ‎ The foot wasn't formed on April 26, and the disaster was not a one-day event. Replaced 'glass' with zirconium. If you know where the glass would have come from, please tell me on Talk page

19:3619:36, 16 May 2024 diff hist −215‎ Aleksandr Akimov ‎ Statements like 'best friends' and 'big brother figure' should be sourced. current

23:2023:20, 11 May 2024 diff hist +6‎ m Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) ‎ →‎Radioactivity
23:2023:20, 11 May 2024 diff hist −131‎ Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) ‎ →‎Radioactivity: Removing the reference to '2500 Bq,' since this is totally meaningless without stating the mass of the sample. I also heavily suspect that the source was misquoted, since this is many orders of magnitude lower than all other available data.
23:1023:10, 11 May 2024 diff hist +87‎ Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) ‎ →‎Radioactivity: Inaccurate to say that most radiation emitted is alpha, since this will be mostly self-shielded.

16:1216:12, 10 May 2024 diff hist +698‎ Chernobyl disaster ‎ Undid revision 1222979368 by Reaper1945 (talk) Please assume good faith and do not use improper editing practices. Substandard sources are not grounds for removing well established facts. Feel free to cite a better source if you don't like Getty images. There are hundreds. Tag: Undo

02:5902:59, 9 May 2024 diff hist +11‎ Chernobyl disaster ‎ Tokaimura arguably counts, so let's qualify as 'commercial nuclear power generation'
02:5402:54, 9 May 2024 diff hist +698‎ Chernobyl disaster ‎ →‎Area cleanup: Restoring, moving and rephrasing the mention of barda. I don't see how the source is dubious, regardless, the use of barda is common knowledge and could be cited hundreds of times

02:5302:53, 28 April 2024 diff hist +298‎ Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster ‎ Any edits to this material need to address the existence of differing estimates, uncertainty, and the new information must be cited
02:5102:51, 28 April 2024 diff hist +247‎ Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster ‎ Undid revision 1220623593 by 149.88.25.131 (talk) I am reverting these edits, which lead to spurious citations that conflict with the statements they are supposed to support. Tag: Undo
02:4802:48, 28 April 2024 diff hist −11‎ RBMK ‎ rewording

14:3414:34, 18 April 2024 diff hist −26‎ Chernobyl disaster ‎ The planned shutdown is uncontroversial and extremely well corroborated, not an assertion by Dyatlov. Also, numerous eyewitnesses agree that the button was pressed in calm circumstances

13:0213:02, 13 April 2024 diff hist +55‎ Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant ‎ Undid revision 1218552990 by 83.3.158.82 (talk)Reverting. Decommissioning =/= tearing down buildings Tag: Undo