User contributions for Springee
A user with 17,870 edits. Account created on 21 March 2008.
17 May 2024
- 16:1616:16, 17 May 2024 diff hist +146 Talk:Jordan Peterson →C2C Journal doesn't look very RS either
- 16:1516:15, 17 May 2024 diff hist +347 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Telegraph should not be used as a source for transgender issues: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:3615:36, 17 May 2024 diff hist +474 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Telegraph should not be used as a source for transgender issues: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1515:15, 17 May 2024 diff hist +482 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Telegraph should not be used as a source for transgender issues: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:4514:45, 17 May 2024 diff hist +1,081 User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish →Can you explain something to me?
- 14:3814:38, 17 May 2024 diff hist +154 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of various sourcing tags: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:3114:31, 17 May 2024 diff hist +582 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of various sourcing tags: new section Tag: New topic
- 14:2614:26, 17 May 2024 diff hist +313 User talk:Elinruby →Can you provide some information on this link?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:1514:15, 17 May 2024 diff hist +679 User talk:Elinruby →Can you provide some information on this link?
- 13:5213:52, 17 May 2024 diff hist +948 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Telegraph should not be used as a source for transgender issues: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:4713:47, 17 May 2024 diff hist +47 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Telegraph should not be used as a source for transgender issues
- 13:4613:46, 17 May 2024 diff hist +136 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Telegraph should not be used as a source for transgender issues: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:4412:44, 17 May 2024 diff hist +908 User talk:Elinruby →Notice: new section Tags: Reverted contentious topics alert New topic
- 12:3512:35, 17 May 2024 diff hist +714 Talk:Jordan Peterson →"political correctness" is pejorative and NPOV
- 12:3112:31, 17 May 2024 diff hist +458 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead
- 12:2812:28, 17 May 2024 diff hist +85 Jordan Peterson Restored original phrasing of C-16 discussion in lead. No consensus for changes to wording and removal of sentence. Quotes around PC and IP are retained though (not an endorsement). Recent change to the location of the paragraph also retained (not an endorsement)
- 12:2512:25, 17 May 2024 diff hist −247 Jordan Peterson rvt to QUO, Removed Ontario court ruling from lead. No consensus after talk page change.
- 11:5311:53, 17 May 2024 diff hist +313 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Jubilee medal: Reply Tag: Reply
16 May 2024
- 13:2313:23, 16 May 2024 diff hist +349 Talk:Jordan Peterson →"political correctness" is pejorative and NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1513:15, 16 May 2024 diff hist +280 Talk:Jordan Peterson →"political correctness" is pejorative and NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1213:12, 16 May 2024 diff hist +242 User talk:Elinruby →Can you provide some information on this link?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1013:10, 16 May 2024 diff hist +102 Talk:Jordan Peterson →"political correctness" is pejorative and NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1013:10, 16 May 2024 diff hist +288 Talk:Jordan Peterson →"political correctness" is pejorative and NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:4712:47, 16 May 2024 diff hist +132 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:5511:55, 16 May 2024 diff hist +288 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:4311:43, 16 May 2024 diff hist +563 Talk:Jordan Peterson →British liberal: new section Tag: New topic
- 11:3411:34, 16 May 2024 diff hist +333 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:3011:30, 16 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Talk:Jordan Peterson →Name-dropping Rachel Notley is UNDUE
- 11:3011:30, 16 May 2024 diff hist +572 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Name-dropping Rachel Notley is UNDUE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:3310:33, 16 May 2024 diff hist +196 Talk:Jordan Peterson →we are not required to report blatantly false claims in exquisite detail: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:2110:21, 16 May 2024 diff hist +117 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Name-dropping Rachel Notley is UNDUE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:2110:21, 16 May 2024 diff hist +192 Talk:Jordan Peterson →we are not required to report blatantly false claims in exquisite detail: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4402:44, 16 May 2024 diff hist +314 Talk:Jordan Peterson →"political correctness" is pejorative and NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4202:42, 16 May 2024 diff hist +343 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Name-dropping Rachel Notley is UNDUE: Reply Tag: Reply
15 May 2024
- 03:1803:18, 15 May 2024 diff hist +319 User talk:Elinruby →Can you provide some information on this link?: new section Tag: New topic
- 01:2001:20, 15 May 2024 diff hist +225 Talk:Andy Ngo →Alternative suggestion: Reply Tag: Reply
14 May 2024
- 23:3923:39, 14 May 2024 diff hist +801 Talk:Andy Ngo →RfC: First sentence of the lede
- 22:0122:01, 14 May 2024 diff hist +536 Talk:Democratic Party (United States) →Position: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:5721:57, 14 May 2024 diff hist +474 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Poll: Should the article include a political position for the Republican Party in the infobox?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:4319:43, 14 May 2024 diff hist +150 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Poll: Should the article include a political position for the Republican Party in the infobox?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:4219:42, 14 May 2024 diff hist +211 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Poll: Should the article include a political position for the Republican Party in the infobox?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:1619:16, 14 May 2024 diff hist +669 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0819:08, 14 May 2024 diff hist +542 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:4118:41, 14 May 2024 diff hist +1,189 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Poll: Should the article include a political position for the Republican Party in the infobox?
- 14:1014:10, 14 May 2024 diff hist +267 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Adjusting factions in the lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0014:00, 14 May 2024 diff hist +144 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
13 May 2024
- 01:4301:43, 13 May 2024 diff hist +513 User talk:Fred Zepelin →FOC: new section Tag: New topic
- 01:3801:38, 13 May 2024 diff hist +678 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
12 May 2024
- 23:1223:12, 12 May 2024 diff hist +349 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:2222:22, 12 May 2024 diff hist +219 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
11 May 2024
- 11:3011:30, 11 May 2024 diff hist +457 Talk:True North Centre for Public Policy →Request for comment on opening sentence current
- 11:1411:14, 11 May 2024 diff hist +411 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:2603:26, 11 May 2024 diff hist +432 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →The Telegraph and trans issues
- 03:2203:22, 11 May 2024 diff hist +372 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:2003:20, 11 May 2024 diff hist +581 Talk:Jordan Peterson →WP:FRINGE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:0603:06, 11 May 2024 diff hist +288 Talk:Jordan Peterson →WP:FRINGE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:0603:06, 11 May 2024 diff hist +153 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead
- 03:0403:04, 11 May 2024 diff hist +347 Talk:Jordan Peterson →WP:FRINGE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:0103:01, 11 May 2024 diff hist +354 Talk:Jordan Peterson →WP:FRINGE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:5802:58, 11 May 2024 diff hist +816 Talk:Jordan Peterson →Addition of Ontario court ruling to lead: new section Tag: New topic
- 00:0600:06, 11 May 2024 diff hist +319 Talk:Jordan Peterson →WP:FRINGE: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0500:05, 11 May 2024 diff hist −595 Jordan Peterson "controversial" is subjective and discussed later. The last sentence was undue for the article lead Tag: Reverted
10 May 2024
- 01:3801:38, 10 May 2024 diff hist −2,773 Ann Coulter Undid revision 1223123084 by Vosotros32 (talk)Make your case on the talk page per ONUS Tag: Undo
9 May 2024
- 14:3814:38, 9 May 2024 diff hist +185 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Should the GOP article only include the party's political position in its infobox if the article on the Democratic Party does as well?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:1504:15, 9 May 2024 diff hist −1,724 Ann Coulter Undid revision 1222980979 by Vosotros32 (talk)Not a significant fact/POV Tag: Undo
8 May 2024
- 11:5311:53, 8 May 2024 diff hist +291 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Verifiability, second paragraph
7 May 2024
- 22:1122:11, 7 May 2024 diff hist +1,609 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Should the GOP article only include the party's political position in its infobox if the article on the Democratic Party does as well?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:0417:04, 7 May 2024 diff hist −259 Talk:Republican Party (United States) Undid revision 1222738169 by Cortador (talk) You are welcome to move this discussion but as it is related to article connect please do not unilaterally collapse it. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 00:3600:36, 7 May 2024 diff hist +767 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0100:01, 7 May 2024 diff hist +334 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Note claiming that there is "longstanding consensus" not to include a political position for the party: Reply Tag: Reply
6 May 2024
- 14:0214:02, 6 May 2024 diff hist +362 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:4712:47, 6 May 2024 diff hist +241 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:3612:36, 6 May 2024 diff hist +710 Talk:Andy Ngo →Source analysis - May 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:1911:19, 6 May 2024 diff hist +27 Talk:Andy Ngo →Source analysis - May 2024: another edit
- 11:0111:01, 6 May 2024 diff hist +68 Talk:Andy Ngo →Source analysis - May 2024: I think that's context this should be a maybe
- 10:3810:38, 6 May 2024 diff hist +214 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Note claiming that there is "longstanding consensus" not to include a political position for the party: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:2910:29, 6 May 2024 diff hist +336 Talk:Andy Ngo →Source analysis - May 2024
- 04:1404:14, 6 May 2024 diff hist +11 Talk:Andy Ngo →Source analysis: changed name to avoid hyperlink issues
- 04:1304:13, 6 May 2024 diff hist +203 Talk:Andy Ngo →Source analysis
- 04:1004:10, 6 May 2024 diff hist +19,643 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede)
- 04:0004:00, 6 May 2024 diff hist +11 User:Springee/sandbox →Source analysis current
- 00:5700:57, 6 May 2024 diff hist +19,506 User:Springee/sandbox No edit summary
5 May 2024
- 10:5210:52, 5 May 2024 diff hist +189 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4902:49, 5 May 2024 diff hist −190 Ford Pinto Undid revision 1222281012 by 50.213.83.65 (talk)IP editor, your edits are not supported by reliable sources. If you disagree please use the article talk page to explain why. Tag: Undo
- 02:4802:48, 5 May 2024 diff hist +181 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Requesting protection for Ford Pinto
4 May 2024
- 21:1021:10, 4 May 2024 diff hist −190 Ford Pinto Undid revision 1222243360 by 50.213.83.65 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 17:0817:08, 4 May 2024 diff hist +616 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1515:15, 4 May 2024 diff hist +2,180 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:4213:42, 4 May 2024 diff hist +493 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede)
- 13:1313:13, 4 May 2024 diff hist +342 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:3912:39, 4 May 2024 diff hist +659 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:3312:33, 4 May 2024 diff hist +683 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
3 May 2024
- 20:3620:36, 3 May 2024 diff hist +643 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:0620:06, 3 May 2024 diff hist +434 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:3519:35, 3 May 2024 diff hist +542 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:2819:28, 3 May 2024 diff hist +288 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:2619:26, 3 May 2024 diff hist +132 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0419:04, 3 May 2024 diff hist +25 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph
- 19:0219:02, 3 May 2024 diff hist +602 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:5118:51, 3 May 2024 diff hist +677 Talk:Andy Ngo →Discussion (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0714:07, 3 May 2024 diff hist +153 User talk:TarnishedPath →Andy Ngo: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0614:06, 3 May 2024 diff hist +384 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:5913:59, 3 May 2024 diff hist +422 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede): Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:5113:51, 3 May 2024 diff hist +286 User talk:TarnishedPath →Andy Ngo: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:4913:49, 3 May 2024 diff hist +328 Talk:Andy Ngo →Survey (RfC: First sentence of the lede)
- 13:0213:02, 3 May 2024 diff hist −838 Andy Ngo A single example, which is just a day old at the time of adding, is not sufficient to put activist in the opening sentence of the lead, especially given the questionable RfC closing that keeps "journalist" out of the same sentence.
2 May 2024
- 00:4400:44, 2 May 2024 diff hist +94 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Infobox consensus discussion to resolve editing dispute
- 00:4300:43, 2 May 2024 diff hist +302 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Infobox consensus discussion to resolve editing dispute: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:3400:34, 2 May 2024 diff hist +1,206 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Continual edit warring patterns from Cortador: Reply Tag: Reply
1 May 2024
- 15:5315:53, 1 May 2024 diff hist +9 Kenosha unrest shooting Agree with the general recent caption change but "minutes before" could imply 3 minutes or 300. What is important is this is the same evening, before the shooting
- 15:5015:50, 1 May 2024 diff hist −31 Kenosha unrest shooting Undid revision 1221713865 by 128.92.27.115 (talk) Tag: Undo
30 April 2024
- 16:4116:41, 30 April 2024 diff hist +30 Talk:Ginni Thomas →Conservative activist -> far-right activist (sourced)
- 16:3816:38, 30 April 2024 diff hist +186 Talk:Ginni Thomas →Conservative activist -> far-right activist (sourced): Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0315:03, 30 April 2024 diff hist −1,977 Ginni Thomas Undid revision 1221538824 by Cortador (talk) don't edit war and get consensus before restoring controversial changes Tags: Undo Reverted
- 14:1514:15, 30 April 2024 diff hist +625 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →In which order should the article and infobox list the party ideologies and factions?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0614:06, 30 April 2024 diff hist +353 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →In which order should the article and infobox list the party ideologies and factions?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:2013:20, 30 April 2024 diff hist +302 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →In which order should the article and infobox list the party ideologies and factions?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:5411:54, 30 April 2024 diff hist +452 Talk:Ginni Thomas →Conservative activist -> far-right activist (sourced): Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:5111:51, 30 April 2024 diff hist −1,940 Ginni Thomas →2016–present: Only one of the listed sources called her "far-right" in text. Additionally, the sentence as added is editorially questionable. Tag: Reverted
- 11:4111:41, 30 April 2024 diff hist −37 Ginni Thomas Remove per LABEL Tag: Reverted
- 10:4710:47, 30 April 2024 diff hist +481 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →In which order should the article and infobox list the party ideologies and factions?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:2710:27, 30 April 2024 diff hist +389 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →In which order should the article and infobox list the party ideologies and factions?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:2400:24, 30 April 2024 diff hist +184 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:No queerphobes →Wikipedia:No queerphobes
29 April 2024
- 02:3202:32, 29 April 2024 diff hist −190 Ford Pinto Undid revision 1221295498 by 2601:84:847F:DB00:8863:A264:EC31:8D6F (talk)rv drive by addition of OR Tags: Undo Reverted
28 April 2024
- 21:1121:11, 28 April 2024 diff hist 0 Republican Party (United States) Undid revision 1221245058 by JohnAdams1800 (talk)Very much recentism and not clear this is a true category so much as a new name for a combination of various factions that were already there. Tags: Undo Reverted
27 April 2024
- 01:0201:02, 27 April 2024 diff hist +1,250 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should sources with only a single discussion be listed here?: new section Tag: New topic
23 April 2024
- 23:4923:49, 23 April 2024 diff hist −38,619 User talk:Springee Moved to archive
- 23:4823:48, 23 April 2024 diff hist +38,623 N User talk:Springee/Archive 6 ←Created page with '{{Aan}} == ''The Signpost'': 1 January 2023 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-01-01}} </div><!--Volume 19, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full''' * Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpos...' current
- 23:4423:44, 23 April 2024 diff hist +343 User talk:Springee No edit summary
22 April 2024
- 16:4116:41, 22 April 2024 diff hist +1,214 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →PRO: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1015:10, 22 April 2024 diff hist +201 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →PRO: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0715:07, 22 April 2024 diff hist +362 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →PRO: Reply Tag: Reply
21 April 2024
- 23:1923:19, 21 April 2024 diff hist +172 User talk:69.126.152.175 Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5514:55, 21 April 2024 diff hist −2,529 Akilah Hughes Undid revision 1220049713 by 69.126.152.175 (talk)IP editor has been made aware of edit warring policy. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 14:5414:54, 21 April 2024 diff hist +1,390 N User talk:69.126.152.175 ←Created page with '{{subst:Uw-ew|Akilah Hughes}} ~~~~' Tag: New topic
- 11:0011:00, 21 April 2024 diff hist −2,529 Akilah Hughes Undid revision 1220004377 by 69.126.152.175 (talk) needs RS per talk page discussion Tags: Undo Reverted
20 April 2024
- 14:3314:33, 20 April 2024 diff hist +280 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Political position: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:1312:13, 20 April 2024 diff hist +405 Talk:Republican Party (United States) →Political position: Reply Tag: Reply
19 April 2024
- 22:4522:45, 19 April 2024 diff hist +114 Talk:Man →RfC ideas: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:0903:09, 19 April 2024 diff hist +763 Talk:Man →RfC ideas: Reply Tag: Reply
17 April 2024
- 11:5611:56, 17 April 2024 diff hist +1,514 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Paragraph "Due and undue weight" versus "Balance": Reply Tag: Reply
16 April 2024
- 02:5102:51, 16 April 2024 diff hist −10 Douglas Murray (author) "most well" doesn't come off as encyclopedic
- 02:0602:06, 16 April 2024 diff hist +448 Talk:Douglas Murray (author) →Subjective "known for" claim: new section Tag: New topic
- 02:0102:01, 16 April 2024 diff hist −230 User talk:Springee Undid revision 1219147805 by Fred Zepelin (talk) Tag: Undo
- 01:2701:27, 16 April 2024 diff hist +10 Douglas Murray (author) Undid revision 1219147308 by Fred Zepelin (talk)This is a subjective claim so second paragraph is fine. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 00:3300:33, 16 April 2024 diff hist +681 Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
15 April 2024
- 21:5221:52, 15 April 2024 diff hist +215 Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:3317:33, 15 April 2024 diff hist 0 m Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024
- 13:4213:42, 15 April 2024 diff hist +250 Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:2712:27, 15 April 2024 diff hist +2,286 Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
14 April 2024
- 13:5813:58, 14 April 2024 diff hist +29 Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024
- 13:5713:57, 14 April 2024 diff hist +775 Talk:Kyle Rittenhouse →Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
12 April 2024
- 17:0517:05, 12 April 2024 diff hist +489 Talk:Man →Image bad: Reply Tag: Reply