User contributions for Amanda A. Brant

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:4018:40, 15 May 2024 diff hist −3,109‎ Kara Dansky ‎ in my view it merits a redirect to the organization she is president of (the US branch of), but not much more. Tags: New redirect Reverted
09:5909:59, 15 May 2024 diff hist +56‎ Kara Dansky ‎No edit summary
09:5709:57, 15 May 2024 diff hist −197‎ Kara Dansky ‎No edit summary
09:5509:55, 15 May 2024 diff hist −51‎ Kara Dansky ‎No edit summary

09:2109:21, 10 May 2024 diff hist +24‎ N Reduxx ‎ ←Redirected page to Anna Slatz current Tag: New redirect
09:1609:16, 10 May 2024 diff hist +16‎ Anna Slatz ‎No edit summary
09:1609:16, 10 May 2024 diff hist +14‎ Anna Slatz ‎No edit summary
09:1509:15, 10 May 2024 diff hist +652‎ Anna Slatz ‎No edit summary
07:0707:07, 10 May 2024 diff hist −18‎ Anna Slatz ‎ →‎Career
07:0607:06, 10 May 2024 diff hist +7‎ Anna Slatz ‎No edit summary
07:0607:06, 10 May 2024 diff hist +1,365‎ Anna Slatz ‎No edit summary

01:0201:02, 3 May 2024 diff hist −61‎ Reem Alsalem ‎ per source, remove POV phrasing that is not supported by any of the sources. Even the biased source only says the letter accused her of being “anti-trans”.

15:5115:51, 1 May 2024 diff hist −10‎ Reem Alsalem ‎ odd phrasing. It is clear from the AWID letter that it is not her "call to recognise that sex and gender are distinct" that "led to" AWID publishing the letter, but rather her "anti-trans" views and "harmful statements" that "undermine the rights protections of trans people"
03:1303:13, 1 May 2024 diff hist −33‎ Reem Alsalem ‎No edit summary
03:1203:12, 1 May 2024 diff hist −386‎ Reem Alsalem ‎ the Sexual Rights Initiative letter mentions and links to the joint letter by hundreds of organizations. It seems odd to mention a much more obscure letter by just one organization before the letter by hundreds of organizations. In fact, it seems redunant to even mention this letter by just one org. when it explicitly invokes the much more prominent joint letter.

15:0415:04, 19 April 2024 diff hist −45‎ University of Austin ‎ not the federally recognized accreditor for this region
15:0315:03, 19 April 2024 diff hist −14‎ University of Austin ‎No edit summary
15:0215:02, 19 April 2024 diff hist +153‎ University of Austin ‎No edit summary