User contributions for 75.84.218.91

This IP address is currently partially blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

22:11, 2 May 2024 Ponyo talk contribs blocked 75.84.218.91 talk from the page Jillian Michaels with an expiration time of 3 months (anon. only) (Persistent addition of unsourced content: edit warring to restore COI edits)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

22:0822:08, 2 May 2024 diff hist +39‎ Jillian Michaels ‎ Undid revision 1221932450 by FMSky (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19:5519:55, 21 April 2024 diff hist −794‎ Jillian Michaels ‎ The james fell article was an OP ED and proven and subsequently proven untrue. This is over 14 years old now. And the LA times printed a retraction. https://news.yahoo.com/blogs/omg-tv/burning-did-biggest-loser-jillian-michaels-too-far-130350231.html#:~:text=None%20of%20the%20controversies%20went,she%20is%20accredited%20by%20the Tag: Reverted
04:2604:26, 21 April 2024 diff hist −293‎ Jillian Michaels ‎ Undid revision 1219984761 by CanonNi (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
03:1603:16, 21 April 2024 diff hist −293‎ Jillian Michaels ‎ This article by James fell is 14 years old. Michaels has held multiple certifications since the age of 18. She proved this was false information and the LA times printed a retraction. This shouldn't even be here. It's over a decade old and never had validity in the first place. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20:5220:52, 14 April 2024 diff hist +27‎ Jillian Michaels ‎ Undid revision 1218944373 by FMSky (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
05:1005:10, 14 April 2024 diff hist −1,659‎ Jillian Michaels ‎ →‎Controversy: none of the previous controversies were actually "controversies" - all those lawsuits were dismissed AND the LA times did print a retraction - michaels was and always has held multiple certifications. this is all slander. https://news.yahoo.com/blogs/omg-tv/burning-did-biggest-loser-jillian-michaels-too-far-130350231.html#:~:text=None%20of%20the%20controversies%20went,she%20is%20accredited%20by%20the