Jump to content

Pseudo-Riemannian manifold: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 May 2024

  • curprev 01:0001:00, 23 May 2024Kobmuiv talk contribs 9,054 bytes +30 This article begins with "in differential geometry" and has "applications in physics" part. Only 4D Lorentzian manifolds are used in general relativity with experimental evidences. Almost all semi-Riemannian manifolds have nothing to do with physics. Where is your "win"? Nothing about it in Talk. If you won, why this article says it is geometry and has applications in physics? You should accept "quantum mechanics is not physics but chemistry or semiconductor engineering" if you insist that. kids undo Tag: Undo

6 May 2024

  • curprev 22:3622:36, 6 May 2024162.157.84.254 talk 9,024 bytes −30 this is not geometry, but a poor "knockoff". there was a discussion over this before and i "won". it was accepted "pseudo-Riemannian" is a contrived concept that belongs in the realm of "physics" and not math, because if it was math, then it wouldn't need to be called physics. losers. Tags: Undo Reverted
(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)