List of exoplanet extremes: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 18:5118:51, 6 May 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 64,474 bytes +35‎ Altered title. Add: bibcode, arxiv, doi-access, authors 1-1. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar undo
curprev 13:0113:01, 6 May 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 64,439 bytes −1,224‎ It is unnecessary to give a complete description of the planet.This just makes navigating the tables complicated. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 12:5712:57, 6 May 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 65,663 bytes −199‎ Redundant undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 11:3511:35, 6 May 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 65,862 bytes +722‎ WASP-183 b is called as "unphysically old" by the discovery paper, and its high age may be due to the the K dwarf radius anomaly. Substituting it to another planet that is generally known as one of the oldest planets, and is called as the "oldest planet" by a reliable source. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 08:0708:07, 19 April 2024‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 65,140 bytes 0‎ v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner

curprev 09:1009:10, 15 April 2024‎ Stevinger talk contribs‎ 65,140 bytes +694‎ added largest possible age of the currently youngest exoplanet according to discovery paper undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 18:3818:38, 14 April 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 64,446 bytes −26‎ While some definitions say that sub-brown dwarfs are not planets (which i disagree), this section should not be empty, so i added PDS 70 b as the largest known exoplanet. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 18:0418:04, 14 April 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 64,472 bytes +116‎ The real youngest planet is ROXs 42Bb. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 13:5813:58, 14 April 2024‎ Stevinger talk contribs‎ 64,356 bytes +1,070‎ Thank you for your work InTheAstronomy32. According to the exoplanet working definition (e.g. 'exoplanet' wiki page), objects 'that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed)'. Also the NASA exoplanet archive does not include free-floating planets (https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/exoplanet_criteria.html). If formation is the criterion: Proplyd 133-353 needed to be shown to have formed like a planet (rogue planet), not like a star (sub-brown dwarf). undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 15:1215:12, 13 April 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 63,286 bytes +678‎ Undid revision 1218732389 by InTheAstronomy32 (talk) Now it has a reference undo Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 13:4713:47, 13 April 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 62,608 bytes −678‎ Added 2MASS J04414489+2301513 b as the youngest planet. In the article there is a claim "It is not clear whether this companion object is a sub-brown dwarf or a planet", but i tagged it with [citation needed] undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 13:4013:40, 13 April 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 63,286 bytes +148‎ Searching NASA Exoplanet Archive, i have found a 1 Myr exoplanet. Most of these young objects are either brown dwarf/sub-brown dwarfs, or their status as an exoplanet is unknown. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 13:2213:22, 13 April 2024‎ InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs‎ 63,138 bytes +795‎ Reverting:Not all planets have host stars, see rogue planet. Also some studies show that there are more rogue planets than planets orbiting stars. I added more valuable information too. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit