Jus trium liberorum: Revision history

27 May 2024

• curprev 15:1315:13, 27 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 8,873 bytes −505‎ →‎top: The sentence on amicitia misunderstood the source (White), which has to do with ways that friends supported one another in such matters as legacies and obtaining the ius liberorum through legal dodges, and which touches on the ius only incidentally undo

25 May 2024

• curprev 23:1523:15, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 9,378 bytes +301‎ →‎Legal specifics: family image undo
• curprev 18:1618:16, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 9,077 bytes +83‎ →‎Impact: added See also section; this article has some odd emphases undo
• curprev 18:0118:01, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ m 8,994 bytes −1‎ →‎top: typo undo
• curprev 18:0118:01, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 8,995 bytes +228‎ →‎top: replacing image with one that also expresses the Augustan procreative programme undo
• curprev 17:4617:46, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 8,767 bytes −26‎ →‎top: Or at least regarded as such by the sole source (from 1945) cited undo
• curprev 17:4317:43, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 8,793 bytes +17‎ →‎top: here undo
• curprev 17:4017:40, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 8,776 bytes −221‎ →‎Bibliography: this doesn't belong here undo
• curprev 17:3417:34, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 8,997 bytes −252‎ →‎Eugenic implications: deleting this sentence because Berger as cited says NOTHING AT ALL about "racial purity" or blood or any of that undo
• curprev 17:2017:20, 25 May 2024‎ Cynwolfe talk contribs‎ 9,249 bytes −26‎ →‎Eugenic implications: if it wasn't important to note, it shouldn't be included; and you can't assert something "in fact" with a modal verb that renders the statement a possibility rather than a fact; also, this whole section false because the ''ius'' applied to any citizen, including former slaves freed from Quiritary ownership, and was extended even to women holding only Junian Latin status