E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

21 May 2024

20 May 2024

16 May 2024

6 May 2024

29 April 2024

  • curprev 05:4305:43, 29 April 2024UpdateNerd talk contribs 190,848 bytes −40 Undid good-faith edit by SPECIFICO (talk) you got it wrong, the law doesn't consider any such partial penetration as being rape, hence why there was no conviction; the direct quotation of Carroll was admitted by the judge and we don't censor "graphic" material undo Tag: Undo

28 April 2024

26 April 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)