Criminal damage in English law: Revision history

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 May 2024

  • curprev 02:5102:51, 22 May 2024‎ 144.124.3.151 talk‎ 29,976 bytes 0‎ The judgment in Morphitis v Salmon was given 7 July 1989. Corrected in-text year to reflect this. Will leave citations in references untouched for now, but it is clear that author mistakenly believes the case to have not been reported in full which is not true. See draft article on the case, written using the Justice of the Peace report available on Lexis+ UK undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched

13 May 2024

26 April 2024

  • curprev 02:3102:31, 26 April 2024‎ 144.124.3.223 talk‎ 29,941 bytes +411‎ Previous version completely missed the point of Morphitis v Salmon. Yes the court found that the scratch likely could not be criminal damage, but this was a quirk of how the charge was worded. It is extremely notable that dismantling the barrier would have been criminal damage despite no harm to any part of the structure, had the charge been for criminal damage to the barrier as a structure rather than part of the barrier. Tag: Visual edit
(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_damage_in_English_law"