Astolfo: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 21:0621:06, 3 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ With zero resemblance of a ridiculous anime character with childish design. The only thing they share is the name. You only picked my weakest argument and left out the rest. undo Tag: Undo

curprev 08:0908:09, 2 June 2024‎ 94.254.144.219 talk‎ 8,001 bytes +964‎ it's not any "historical figure", it's a fictional character undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 01:0401:04, 2 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ That's not true, there is no explicit mention that the character was inspired by the historical figure. Plus, its a disservice to his character as he didn't have any inclination and/or style to being a femboy. Popularity is irrelevant, there are countless of historical figures who also share a name with other popular characters and yet aren't even mentioned in their wikis. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted section blanking

curprev 23:2723:27, 31 May 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ m 8,001 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 23:2623:26, 31 May 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ m 8,000 bytes −45‎ removed unnecessary information undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 01:3801:38, 31 May 2024‎ Nalydac talk contribs‎ 8,045 bytes +1,008‎ Undid revision 1226299517 by Damsen117 (talk) Section is for references in 'other media'. The Astolfo from fate is explicitly based on the original, and his popularity from this incarnation warrants a mention. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 19:3119:31, 29 May 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −1,008‎ Yes there is. The character from Fade has nothing to do with this historical figure other than sharing a name. Also, the original Astolfo isn't an anime femboy. undo Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

curprev 23:2423:24, 16 May 2024‎ RandomEditsForWhenIRemember talk contribs‎ 8,045 bytes +1,008‎ Undid revision 1221289932 by Damsen117 (talk) - No need for this to be removed + no reasoning given undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 23:4723:47, 14 May 2024‎ 174.53.69.162 talk‎ 7,058 bytes +21‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 01:0801:08, 29 April 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −1,008‎ Undid revision 1219642132 by Nalydac (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

curprev 22:5322:53, 23 April 2024‎ 142.167.250.217 talk‎ 8,045 bytes −9‎ Undid revision 1220462225 by 75.88.38.106 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
curprev 22:3722:37, 23 April 2024‎ 75.88.38.106 talk‎ 8,054 bytes +9‎ Made it better undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:0900:09, 19 April 2024‎ Nalydac talk contribs‎ 8,045 bytes +1,008‎ Undid revision 1219317260 by Damsen117 (talk) Removing references about Astolfo's most well known modern portrayal is unnecessary. Many wikipedia articles of mythological or historical figures have sections regarding their modern portrayals and Astolfo is hardly an exception. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 00:5900:59, 17 April 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −1,008‎ Undid revision 1216886524 by Nalydac (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking