Andrew Cavendish, 11th Duke of Devonshire: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 01:2701:27, 22 May 2024‎ Unfriendnow talk contribs‎ 20,267 bytes −320‎ Undid revision 1225049645 by Unfriendnow (talk) undo Tag: Undo
curprev 01:2601:26, 22 May 2024‎ Unfriendnow talk contribs‎ 20,587 bytes +320‎ Undid revision 1223426288 by Willthacheerleader18 (talk) The only reason he got that government career is through his status as a member the British aristocracy and his familial connections. His sister-in-law isn't a distant relation. Again go argue on the talk page. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 01:3301:33, 12 May 2024‎ Willthacheerleader18 talk contribs‎ 20,267 bytes −320‎ Undid revision 1223239673 by Unfriendnow (talk) his notability is established through his government career, not distant relations undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 19:4219:42, 10 May 2024‎ Unfriendnow talk contribs‎ 20,587 bytes +320‎ His notability came largely from his status as a member the British aristocracy. That makes his connections to other prominent figures significant. His connection to his famous sister-in-law is mentioned in almost very article about him as well. There is also a good source. If you disagree go argue on the talk page. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit

curprev 20:0620:06, 30 April 2024‎ Namenotimportant00 talk contribs‎ 20,587 bytes +320‎ again no. his connection to his sister-in-law is mentioned in almost very article about man, it is not trivia and not unsourced. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

curprev 22:2822:28, 29 April 2024‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 20,267 bytes −295‎ Undid revision 1221293709 by Namenotimportant00 (talk) there are two reasons to get rid of it: the first part wrongly summarizes the content of the article (in which he is associated with three, not two, political parties), and the second part is inane trivia, unsourced and irrelevant to his biography undo Tag: Undo
curprev 01:3801:38, 29 April 2024‎ Namenotimportant00 talk contribs‎ 20,562 bytes +295‎ Undid revision 1220907367 by JayBeeEll (talk) No reason to get rid of that. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 17:1117:11, 26 April 2024‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 20,267 bytes −295‎ Undid revision 1214933067 by Unfriendnow (talk) the IP is obviously correct; also WP:BRD Tags: Undo Reverted