"We're being pressured into sex by some trans women": Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 13:1513:15, 7 June 2024‎ Flounder fillet talk contribs‎ 41,538 bytes +17‎ ref undo
curprev 12:5912:59, 7 June 2024‎ Shapeyness talk contribs‎ 41,521 bytes +1,365‎ Undid revision 1227721602 by Shapeyness (talk) Partial self-revert, misread the change - I have kept some of the old wording but restored addition of sources undo
curprev 12:5212:52, 7 June 2024‎ Shapeyness talk contribs‎ 40,156 bytes −1,297‎ Undid revision 1227695584 by Flounder fillet (talk) Unexplained removal of information about the shortcomings of the Get the L Out poll undo Tag: Undo
curprev 09:1409:14, 7 June 2024‎ Flounder fillet talk contribs‎ 41,453 bytes +1,297‎ Replaced paragraph with cited version undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 11:5311:53, 22 May 2024‎ Some1 talk contribs‎ 40,156 bytes +45‎ less vague undo
curprev 11:4711:47, 22 May 2024‎ Some1 talk contribs‎ 40,111 bytes −11‎ more neutral wording since the body of the article did report that this has happened to *some* lesbians, but clarify that it's not done by *all* trans women undo
curprev 04:5004:50, 22 May 2024‎ LokiTheLiar talk contribs‎ 40,122 bytes 0‎ Undid revision 1225053980 by Some1 (talk) "Claim" is only inappropriate when it calls a statement into question without evidence. But the article goes into great detail about how shaky this claim was, so "claim" is appropriate. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 02:1402:14, 22 May 2024‎ Some1 talk contribs‎ 40,122 bytes 0‎ MOS:CLAIM undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched

curprev 16:0216:02, 22 April 2024‎ 92.236.28.125 talk‎ 40,122 bytes −7‎ →‎Summary: “Pre-op” and “post-op” are not really accepted ways to describe a person’s relationship with Gender Realignment Surgery/‘sex change.’ It doesn’t make sense to refer to a woman with a penis as “pre-op” if she never in fact intends to get that particular surgery. I reviewed the sentence and found that it didn’t need her genitals mentioned at all. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit