Talk:Swatantrya Veer Savarkar (film): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:45, 25 April 2024

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2024

This edit request to Swatantrya Veer Savarkar has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Ghogare.rohan (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please change The film has been criticised for distorting history and for promoting one-sided agenda to This film is masterpiece and portray the true character brave freedom fighter of india . The veer savarkar is the father of Modern India who shaped its history. <ref>https://www.moneycontrol.com/entertainment/movies/swatantra-veer-savarkar-review-randeep-hooda-the-director-outshines-the-actor-in-strangely-fascinating-yarn-article-12515291.html<ref>All the true events of his intriguing life have been depicted and a Balanced Perspective<ref>https://awbi.in/swatantra-veer-savarkar-movie-review/#google_vignette<ref> Ghogare.rohan (talk) 10:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This film is masterpiece and portray the true character brave freedom fighter of india . The veer savarkar is the father of Modern India who shaped its history. Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).^[1] It was released in theatres on 22 March 2024.^[2]^[3]

It can be like this or anything other you can suggest here. Grabup (talk) 09:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think this edit should go in the second paragraph of the lead, because "worshipful tone" is an opinion and not appropriate for the opening lead sentence, which needs to be more neutral as per WP:NPOV.

It is sourced from the Indian Express article :

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/movie-review/swantantrya-veer-savarkar-movie-review-randeep-hooda-propulsive-in-reductive-one-sided-narrative-9228018/

"What we get is a detailed biographical sketch of Savarkar, the arc being drawn from his childhood"

"You could argue that Hooda’s intention was to right what he considers are historical wrongs towards his hero, and there’s not an iota of doubt of the near-worshipful tone the film bears towards the central character."

RogerYg (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Second paragraph (of lead)

The film presents a detailed biographical sketch of Savarkar from his childhood, including the key events from his life, often in a near-worshipful tone towards its central character.[9] The film has been criticised for distorting history and for promoting one-sided agenda[8][9][10][11] but received praises for its actors' performances.[12][13] RogerYg (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:WEIGHT, we need more citations backing your edit request. Grabup (talk) 09:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Randeep Hooda pays tribute to freedom fighter Swatantryaveer Savarkar on death anniversary, shares experience from Kalapani visit". Mid-day. 2024-02-26. Retrieved 2024-02-26.
^ "'Swatantrya Veer Savarkar': Randeep Hooda announces release date of Savarkar biopic". The Economist Times. 30 January 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
^ "Randeep Hooda's Swatantrya Veer Savarkar Trailer Gives Glimpse of the Man Most Feared by British". ETV Bharat News. 2024-03-04. Retrieved 2024-03-04.

Shabby writing

The lead mentions,

The film has been criticised for distorting history and for promoting one-sided agenda ...

But in the body, we have nothing on either locus — the fundamental question of how did the film distort history has been left unanswered. Such are the perils of fixing the lead without bothering about the body. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Swatantrya Veer Savarkar (film). (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Carl A. Harte 162.216.141.52 (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Randeep Hooda pays tribute to freedom fighter Swatantryaveer Savarkar on death anniversary, shares experience from Kalapani visit". Mid-day. 2024-02-26. Retrieved 2024-02-26.

[2] "'Swatantrya Veer Savarkar': Randeep Hooda announces release date of Savarkar biopic". The Economist Times. 30 January 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.

[3] "Randeep Hooda's Swatantrya Veer Savarkar Trailer Gives Glimpse of the Man Most Feared by British". ETV Bharat News. 2024-03-04. Retrieved 2024-03-04.

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 <!-- State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably in a "change X to Y" format. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be declined. -->
-"change: THE FILM HAS BEEN CRITICISED FOR DISTORTING HISTORY AND FOR PROMOTING ONE-SIDED AGENDA, BUT HAS RECEIVED PRAISES FOR ITS ACTORS' PERFORMANCES. to THE FILM HAS BEEN CRITICISED MOSTLY BY THE LEFT INTELLIGENTSIA OF INDIA FOR DISTORTING HISTORY AND FOR PROMOTING ONE-SIDED AGENDA, BUT HAS RECEIVED PRAISES FOR ITS ACTORS' PERFORMANCES. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE RIGHT WING APPRECIATED THE FILM AS THE BALANCED RETELLING OF THE STORY OF A GREAT REVOLUTIONARY WHO CONTRIBUTED TOWARDS THE ARMED MOVEMENT OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE.<ref>https://hindupost.in/society-culture/swatantryaveer-savarkar-iconic-revolutionarys-honor-restoredat-andaman-modi-govt/></ref>
+"change: THE FILM HAS BEEN CRITICISED FOR DISTORTING HISTORY AND FOR PROMOTING ONE-SIDED AGENDA, BUT HAS RECEIVED PRAISES FOR ITS ACTORS' PERFORMANCES. to THE FILM HAS BEEN CRITICISED MOSTLY BY THE LEFT INTELLIGENTSIA OF INDIA FOR DISTORTING HISTORY AND FOR PROMOTING ONE-SIDED AGENDA, BUT HAS RECEIVED PRAISES FOR ITS ACTORS' PERFORMANCES. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE RIGHT WING APPRECIATED THE FILM AS THE BALANCED RETELLING OF THE STORY OF A GREAT REVOLUTIONARY WHO CONTRIBUTED TOWARDS THE ARMED MOVEMENT OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE.<ref>https://hindupost.in/society-culture/swatantryaveer-savarkar-iconic-revolutionarys-honor-restoredat-andaman-modi-govt</ ref>
 I think this is needed to be told instead of directly alleging that the movie distorts the history on the basis of some articles written by a bunch of people.