Jump to content

Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Main Page/Archive 207) (bot
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 33: Line 33:
Please *start* a new discussion at the bottom of this talk page (e.g. using the "New section" button above), or use the "[edit]" link beside a heading to add to an existing section.
Please *start* a new discussion at the bottom of this talk page (e.g. using the "New section" button above), or use the "[edit]" link beside a heading to add to an existing section.
---------------- -->
---------------- -->

== Today DYK 4/23/23 "The Glorious Cause" ==

". . . that "The Glorious Cause: . . ." has been the first, second, and third volume of the Oxford History of the United States?" Mixes categories, so it is misleading or a trick statement. It was the first volume published, but it was never intended to be the first volume chronologically-—when it was published it was intended to be the second volume, but since then the period before 1763 has been divided into two volumes. So it is now the third volume chronologically. Because the sentence doesn’t define in which way it is first, second, and third, it’s a TRICK statement, not a sensible statement of fact. [[User:Wis2fan|Wis2fan]] ([[User talk:Wis2fan|talk]]) 03:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:45, 24 April 2024

Archives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive.

001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207

Main Page error reports

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 19:12 on 6 June 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed, determined not to be an error, or the item has rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Today's FA

Tomorrow's FA

Day-after-tomorrow's FA

Errors with "In the news"

Errors in "Did you know ..."

Current DYK

The C U in da Ball Pit hook says “ best known song” when it should say “best-known song”. Zanahary (talk) 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, a little stylistic glitch. The far bigger problem, though, is that the hook fact of it being the "best-known song" does not appear to be in the article. Or am I overlooking something? Ping ThaesOfereode (nominator), CSJJ104 (reviewer), PrimalMustelid (promoter to prep), and Z1720 (promoter to queue). Schwede66 05:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps reword in the interim to "... that despite the success of their song "C U in da Ballpit", Camping in Alaska says they all hate it? —Bagumba (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've tweaked that suggestion a bit to not run into the normal language variety issue. Schwede66 05:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think "success of" is better phrasing anyway. I thought the "best-known song" wording was in the article, but apparently not. I apologize; I should have caught it before DYK submission. Thanks for fixing it. ThaesOfereode (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ouyay avehay omethingsay ongwray inyay ouryay ainbray ildchay ppay 199.235.193.64 (talk) 18:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Working sketch of the mastodon rembrandt peale (cropped).jpg: needs US copyright tag. Therapyisgood (talk) 14:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an Error. You can attend to this once the protection comes off. Schwede66 17:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next DYK

Next-but-one DYK

Errors in "On this day"

Today's OTD

Tomorrow's OTD

  • 1969 – The rock supergroup Blind Faith, featuring Eric Clapton, Steve Winwood and Ginger Baker, played their only UK show in London's Hyde Park in front of 100,000 fans.
This is ambiguous? From what I understand from the article, this was Blind Faith's only concert anywhere in the UK so I think we need a comma after "played their only UK show". Otherwise it can be read as the only show in the park ie they may have held concerts elsewhere in UK.
Or could be tweaked to:
'In their only UK concert, the rock supergroup Blind Faith, featuring Eric Clapton, Steve Winwood and Ginger Baker, debuted in London's Hyde Park in front of 100,000 fans.' (or similar) JennyOz (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The 1917 entry states that the mines killed 10,000. Both the bolded article here and entries on its talk page now suggest that this might be a considerable overestimate based on a misinterpretation of German sources. There is no clear answer, but the hook seems unduly certain about the figure. Maybe add a "perhaps", as a minimum. JMCHutchinson (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Day-after-tomorrow's OTD

Errors in the summary of the featured list

Friday's FL

(June 7, tomorrow)
  • List of premiers of Victoria - the blurb has "Premiers who hold the office for more than 3,000 days are entitled to a statue, a milestone six premiers have achieved," but the lede of the list has "Five premiers, Daniel Andrews, Henry Bolte, John Cain Jr, Albert Dunstan, and Rupert Hamer, have achieved this milestone".
Its ref confirms five is correct. JennyOz (talk) 05:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Schwede66 05:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monday's FL

(June 10)

Errors in the summary of the featured picture

Today's POTD

Tomorrow's POTD

General discussion

Today DYK 4/23/23 "The Glorious Cause"

". . . that "The Glorious Cause: . . ." has been the first, second, and third volume of the Oxford History of the United States?" Mixes categories, so it is misleading or a trick statement. It was the first volume published, but it was never intended to be the first volume chronologically-—when it was published it was intended to be the second volume, but since then the period before 1763 has been divided into two volumes. So it is now the third volume chronologically. Because the sentence doesn’t define in which way it is first, second, and third, it’s a TRICK statement, not a sensible statement of fact. Wis2fan (talk) 03:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]