Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers for the granting guidelines. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol.
I noticed that the articles I have created were all reviewed by the same 2 or 3 people so thought I could help out in reviewing new articles. I have read WP:New pages patrol. Hrodvarsson (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Sorry, despite of strong contributions to the mainspace, I don't see the level of familiarity with policies desired in the project namespace. A quick scan of AfD votes reveals duplicates of the same deletion rationale. Thank you for your interest, my apologies again. Alex Shih (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have read and understood the tutorial and related guidelines. I hope to help out to reduce the backlog of unreviewed new pages. I've made three [1][2][3] articles, and have reviewed about a dozen AfC drafts. About 14 months ago, when it first became a permission, I over-tagged when reviewing, and voluntarily gave up the permission. I have spent that time learning from my mistakes; working in Huggle, on drafts, and editing to improve pages and remove maintenance tags. My request in October was denied, and I was asked to apply again once it has been 3 months of continuous editing. Adotchar| reply here 11:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBottalk 11:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'm responding to the invitation by Insertcleverphrasehere. I have been at Wikipedia for over 10 years now with close to 79,000 edits, participated in RfDs and AfDs, even nominating a few for deletion and speedy deletion, brought several articles up to FA and GA status, and created at least 36 articles. I believe that my knowledge and experience with policies and guidelines are enough for me to conduct new page reviews. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 11:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My work as a TA in Graduate School has led me to learn how to become more involved with Wikipedia. I have worked to expand and cleanup a number of articles, work that I have found enjoyable. The most frustrating thing about the process is that, for the most part, I have had to teach myself HOW to edit articles and WHAT is allowed. I have received some helpful, friendly advice. Some has been downright offensive. I would like to make the encyclopedia better AND be a friendly voice for newer users. Thank you! Norris.michaelj (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment This user has 449 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 18:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Hi, from your contribution history and the appearance of your user page (which is likely a violation of Wikipedia:User pages, see WP:FAKEARTICLE), it appears that you are potentially editing with conflict of interest. I don't think new page reviewer flag would be appropriate in your case, but there are many other ways you can contribute to the project. Thank you for your interest. Alex Shih (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am a long time contributor, following up on a suggestion, earlier today, that I put my name forward as a volunteer for new page review, and I've decided to give it a go. A second individual suggested I might enjoy it, and I think I might. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please provide a reason, thanks. Alex Shih (talk) 05:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Not done no reason given. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)