Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joe Roe (talk | contribs) at 07:13, 22 August 2023 (→‎User:Indylover2010: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autopatrolled

User:Dawkin Verbier

I have created quite a few articles over the past few days, including about 7 articles and another 7 redirects, and as a new page patroller myself, I think that it would be better if my articles were autopatrolled to cut down on the backlog. I am familiar with the notability criteria and general formatting of articles, and use Hotcat and Hotdefaultsort among other tools. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 09:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 24 articles. MusikBot talk 10:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for thinking of the backlog, but  Not done at this time. You're still technically under the minimum criterion of 25 new articles, which in itself is not a deal-breaker, but combined with the fact that you are still quite new to article creation, and have a relatively low rate, on balance I think your creations would benefit from continued review for the time being. – Joe (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pyeongchang

Xtools currently shows that they've created 969 articles, none of which appear to have started as redirects (based on "original size" column). Their only deleted pages are 12 redirects that were G8 deleted (targets were draftified). They're an experienced editor with over 2 years of activity and 25,000+ edits. Not seeing a need for the NPP team to manually patrol this user's creations. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Courcelles (talk) 03:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Indylover2010

Xtools currently shows that Indylover2010 has created 386 articles, 3 of which have been deleted at AfD. They have created 208 articles since the last time an article they created was deleted at AfD. Not seeing a need for NPP to manually patrol the pages they create. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thanks. – Joe (talk) 07:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cheney123

Xtools currently shows that they've created 321 articles and 3 deleted pages (all of which were G6 deletions). Active for 4+ years with over 17,000 edits. Not seeing a need for NPP to manually patrol this user's creations. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheUzbek

Xtools currently shows that they've created 105 pages with 3 of them having been deleted (2x G7 deletions & 1x G6 deletion). 21 of these pages are disambiguation pages. Active since February of 2022 and has accumulated 8,000+ edits. Based on my experiencing reviewing their creations, I'm not seeing a need for NPP to manually patrol this user's creations. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:UruGhan

Xtools shows that they've created 156 articles and 1 deleted page (a G7 deletion). Article creations are all election based and they seem to have it down pat. Not seeing a need for NPP to manually review the articles they create. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zacmh

Xtools currently shows that they've created 271 articles, only one of which has been deleted. Their only article deletion was in November of 2021 and they have since created 242 articles. Their focus appears to be mostly genus articles and I haven't found any issues with them while patrolling. Not seeing a need for NPP to manually patrol the pages they create. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Faldi00

I've created more than 25 articles on Wikipedia within less than a year. Furthermore, I am also familiar with its policies and guidelines. With this situation, I am requesting autopatrolled so that my new articles can automatically be reviewed or patrolled. Faldi00 (talk) 13:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsing. They have well over 25 articles, it looks like 81 currently, and it doesn't appear they've ever had one deleted. I spot checked several of their articles and it looks like Faldi00 has a good understanding of notability and sourcing requirements. ––FormalDude (talk) 19:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are editors with hundreds of articles who I would not approve for autopatrolled, FormalDude. It matters not one bit how many articles someone has written. What matters is that their articles are clean. See Noorullah21 below for an example: doesn't meet the numerical threshold but got assigned autopatrolled because their work is clean. Schwede66 21:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It matters a little bit, for example when comparing to the number of their articles that have been deleted. But you're right, it all comes down to their ability to create decent articles, and as I said, I reviewed several of their articles and they were clean. ––FormalDude (talk) 21:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Socccc

Xtools currently shows that they've created 38 pages, only 1 of which was deleted (G6 deletion). Their creations appear to be focused around soccer (shocker, given the name) and I've not come across any issues while patrolling their creations. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:JArmstrong95

Xtools shows that they've created 440 articles, 0 of which have been deleted. They focus largely on elections and related information. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mck09

Seeking to have my pages autopatrolled as a net positive, as a lot of the pages I have created are still as of now, unreviewed. I also plan to create many other articles which is one of the main reasons I am requesting auto patrolled as to cut down on the backlog. I am aware of what warrants the creation of its own article and what does not. I edit a lot of pages regarding history, specifically Afghan history. I generally work with military conflict templates, and am aware of the format. Mck (talk)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 2 articles. MusikBot talk 05:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Have you previously created pages under a different user name, Mck09? If so, which user name was that? Schwede66 05:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is there some reason you already have the autopatrolled userbox on your userpage? Diff.Novem Linguae (talk) 18:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting, for posterity, that Mck09's request was copied word-for-word from Noorullah21's request, which is not just lazy but also technically an attribution violation. DanCherek (talk) 20:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Let's put an end to this. Schwede66 21:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked as a sock. Schwede66 18:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dankpods

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights i have been on wikipedia and have made many edits some of which have been controversial but i only make edits to make articles more neutral and accurate Dankpods (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this was created by accident LOL Dankpods (talk) 22:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ploz ignore this i cant delete it Dankpods (talk) 22:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done – withdrawn. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:21, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Colanao Khod

As stated here, second bullet point, I believe Colanao Khod deserves this right as they created over 80 clean articles, the right will help them expand their field of editing on the site and make it a better place. shelovesneo (talk) 04:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]