Factions in the Republican Party (United States): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1222870866 by Toa Nidhiki05 (talk): Rolling back inaccurate groupings.
Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
Undid revision 1223225190 by Toa Nidhiki05 (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Ideological and political wings of the Republican Party}}
{{short description|Ideological and political wings of the Republican Party}}
{{Use American English|date=February 2019}}{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2021}}The [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] in the [[United States]] includes several [[Political faction|factions]], or wings. During the 19th century, Republican factions included the [[Half-Breeds (politics)|Half-Breeds]], who supported civil service reform; the [[Radical Republicans]], who advocated the immediate and total abolition of slavery, and later advocated civil rights for freed slaves during the [[Reconstruction era]]; and the [[Stalwarts]], who supported machine politics.
{{Use American English|date=February 2019}}{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2021}}The [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] of the United States is a [[big tent]] party composed of various factions. During the 19th century, Republican factions included the [[Half-Breeds (politics)|Half-Breeds]], who supported civil service reform; the [[Radical Republicans]], who advocated the immediate and total abolition of slavery, and later advocated civil rights for freed slaves during the [[Reconstruction era]]; and the [[Stalwarts]], who supported machine politics.


In the 20th century, Republican factions included the Progressive Republicans, the [[Reagan coalition]], and the liberal [[Rockefeller Republicans]].
In the 20th century, Republican factions included the Progressive Republicans, the [[Reagan coalition]], and the liberal [[Rockefeller Republicans]].
Line 8: Line 8:
==21st century factions==
==21st century factions==
[[File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg|thumb|upright=0.7|Former [[President of the United States|President]] [[Donald Trump]]]]
[[File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg|thumb|upright=0.7|Former [[President of the United States|President]] [[Donald Trump]]]]
During the presidency of [[Barack Obama]], the Republican Party experienced internal conflict between its governing class (known as the Republican establishment) and the anti-establishment, small-government [[Tea Party movement]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-tea-party-activists-full-scale-civil-war/story?id=21194296|title=Republicans and Tea Party Activists in 'Full Scale Civil War'|website=ABC News|date=December 12, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/10/02/228524707/gop-establishment-grapples-with-a-tea-party-that-wont-budge|title=GOP Establishment Grapples With A Tea Party That Won't Budge|website=NPR.org|date=October 2, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150914130937/https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/10/02/228524707/gop-establishment-grapples-with-a-tea-party-that-wont-budge|archive-date=September 14, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/not-their-cup-of-tea-the-republican-establishment-versus-the-tea-party/|title=Not Their Cup of Tea: The Republican Establishment versus the Tea Party |first=Alan |last=Abramowitz|website=CenterForPolitics.org|date=November 14, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131116210503/https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/not-their-cup-of-tea-the-republican-establishment-versus-the-tea-party|archive-date=Nov 16, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/establishment-vs-tea-party-in-primary-showdowns/|title=Establishment Vs. Tea Party in Primary Showdowns|website=www.cbsnews.com|date=September 14, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220117000129/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/establishment-vs-tea-party-in-primary-showdowns/|archive-date=Jan 17, 2022|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2012, ''[[The New York Times]]'' identified six wings of the Republican Party: Main Street Voters, Tea Party Voters, Christian Conservatives, Libertarians, The Disaffected, and The Endangered Or Vanished.<ref name="NYTAnalysis"/> In 2014, the Pew Research Center split Republican-leaning voters into three groups: Steadfast Conservatives, Business Conservatives, and Young Outsiders.<ref name="pew2014"/> In 2019, during the presidency of [[Donald Trump]], Perry Bacon Jr. of FiveThirtyEight.com asserted that there were five groups of Republicans: Trumpists, Pro-Trumpers, Trump-Skeptical Conservatives, Trump-Skeptical Moderates, and Anti-Trumpers.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-five-wings-of-the-republican-party/|title=The Five Wings Of The Republican Party|website=FiveThirtyEight.com|first=Perry |last=Bacon|date=March 27, 2019}}</ref>
During the presidency of [[Barack Obama]], the Republican Party experienced internal conflict between its governing class (known as the Republican establishment) and the anti-establishment, small-government [[Tea Party movement]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-tea-party-activists-full-scale-civil-war/story?id=21194296|title=Republicans and Tea Party Activists in 'Full Scale Civil War'|website=ABC News|date=December 12, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/10/02/228524707/gop-establishment-grapples-with-a-tea-party-that-wont-budge|title=GOP Establishment Grapples With A Tea Party That Won't Budge|website=NPR.org|date=October 2, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150914130937/https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/10/02/228524707/gop-establishment-grapples-with-a-tea-party-that-wont-budge|archive-date=September 14, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/not-their-cup-of-tea-the-republican-establishment-versus-the-tea-party/|title=Not Their Cup of Tea: The Republican Establishment versus the Tea Party |first=Alan |last=Abramowitz|website=CenterForPolitics.org|date=November 14, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131116210503/https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/not-their-cup-of-tea-the-republican-establishment-versus-the-tea-party|archive-date=Nov 16, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/establishment-vs-tea-party-in-primary-showdowns/|title=Establishment Vs. Tea Party in Primary Showdowns|website=www.cbsnews.com|date=September 14, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220117000129/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/establishment-vs-tea-party-in-primary-showdowns/|archive-date=Jan 17, 2022|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2012, ''[[The New York Times]]'' identified six wings of the Republican Party: Main Street Voters, Tea Party Voters, Christian Conservatives, Libertarians, The Disaffected, and The Endangered Or Vanished.<ref name="NYTAnalysis">{{Cite web |date=August 26, 2012 |title=A New Guide to the Republican Herd |url=https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/08/26/sunday-review/a-new-guide-to-the-republican-herd.html |website=archive.nytimes.com}}</ref> In 2014, the Pew Research Center split Republican-leaning voters into three groups: Steadfast Conservatives, Business Conservatives, and Young Outsiders.<ref name="pew2014"/> In 2019, during the presidency of [[Donald Trump]], Perry Bacon Jr. of FiveThirtyEight.com asserted that there were five groups of Republicans: Trumpists, Pro-Trumpers, Trump-Skeptical Conservatives, Trump-Skeptical Moderates, and Anti-Trumpers.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-five-wings-of-the-republican-party/|title=The Five Wings Of The Republican Party|website=FiveThirtyEight.com|first=Perry |last=Bacon|date=March 27, 2019}}</ref>


In February 2021, following Trump's 2020 loss to Democrat [[Joe Biden]] and the [[2021 United States Capitol attack]], Philip Bump of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' posited that the Republican Party in the U.S. House of Representatives consisted of three factions: the Trumpists (who voted against the [[second impeachment of Donald Trump]] in 2021, voted against stripping [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]] of her committee assignments, and supported [[efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election]]), the accountability caucus (who supported either the Trump impeachment, the effort to discipline Greene, or both), and the pro-democracy Republicans (who opposed the Trump impeachment and the effort to discipline Greene but also opposed efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results).<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/05/three-factions-house-republicans/|title=The Three Factions of House Republicans |newspaper=The Washington Post|last=Bump|first=Philip |date=February 5, 2021}}</ref> Also in February 2021, Carl Leubsdorf of the ''[[Dallas Morning News]]'' asserted that there were three groups of Republicans: Never Trumpers (including [[Bill Kristol]], Sen. [[Mitt Romney]], and governors [[Charlie Baker]] and [[Larry Hogan]]), Sometimes Trumpers (including Senate Minority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]] and former U.N. Ambassador [[Nikki Haley]]), and Always Trumpers (including Sens. [[Ted Cruz]] and [[Josh Hawley]]).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2021/02/18/the-gop-is-divided-into-3-warring-factions-focused-on-trump-never-sometimes-and-always/|title=The GOP is divided into 3 warring factions focused on Trump: Never, Sometimes and Always|date=February 18, 2021|website=Dallas News}}</ref>
In February 2021, following Trump's 2020 loss to Democrat [[Joe Biden]] and the [[2021 United States Capitol attack]], Philip Bump of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' posited that the Republican Party in the U.S. House of Representatives consisted of three factions: the Trumpists (who voted against the [[second impeachment of Donald Trump]] in 2021, voted against stripping [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]] of her committee assignments, and supported [[efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election]]), the accountability caucus (who supported either the Trump impeachment, the effort to discipline Greene, or both), and the pro-democracy Republicans (who opposed the Trump impeachment and the effort to discipline Greene but also opposed efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results).<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/05/three-factions-house-republicans/|title=The Three Factions of House Republicans |newspaper=The Washington Post|last=Bump|first=Philip |date=February 5, 2021}}</ref> Also in February 2021, Carl Leubsdorf of the ''[[Dallas Morning News]]'' asserted that there were three groups of Republicans: Never Trumpers (including [[Bill Kristol]], Sen. [[Mitt Romney]], and governors [[Charlie Baker]] and [[Larry Hogan]]), Sometimes Trumpers (including Senate Minority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]] and former U.N. Ambassador [[Nikki Haley]]), and Always Trumpers (including Sens. [[Ted Cruz]] and [[Josh Hawley]]).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2021/02/18/the-gop-is-divided-into-3-warring-factions-focused-on-trump-never-sometimes-and-always/|title=The GOP is divided into 3 warring factions focused on Trump: Never, Sometimes and Always|date=February 18, 2021|website=Dallas News}}</ref>
Line 35: Line 35:
Long-term shifts in conservative thinking following the election of Trump have been described as a "new [[fusionism]]" of traditional conservative ideology and right-wing populist themes.<ref name="New Fusionism"/> These have resulted in shifts towards greater support of [[national conservatism]],<ref>{{cite news |title=The growing peril of national conservatism |url=https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/02/15/the-growing-peril-of-national-conservatism |work=[[The Economist]] |date=February 15, 2024 |access-date=February 15, 2024 |archive-date=February 15, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240215195332/https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/02/15/the-growing-peril-of-national-conservatism |url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref> protectionism,<ref>{{cite news |title=The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation |url=https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/10/26/the-republican-party-no-longer-believes-america-is-the-essential-nation |work=[[The Economist]] |date=October 26, 2023 |access-date=February 14, 2024 |archive-date=February 13, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240213131705/https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/10/26/the-republican-party-no-longer-believes-america-is-the-essential-nation |url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref> [[cultural conservatism]], a more [[Realism (international relations)|realist]] foreign policy, a repudiation of [[neoconservatism]], reduced efforts to roll back entitlement programs, and a disdain for traditional checks and balances.<ref name="New Fusionism">{{Cite journal |last1=Ashbee |first1=Edward |last2=Waddan|first2=Alex|date=13 December 2023 |title=US Republicans and the New Fusionism |journal=[[The Political Quarterly]] |language=en |doi=10.1111/1467-923X.13341 |issn=1467-923X }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |last=Garcia-Navarro |first=Lulu |title=Inside the Heritage Foundation's Plans for 'Institutionalizing Trumpism' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/magazine/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html |magazine=[[The New York Times Magazine]] |location=[[New York City]] |publisher=[[The New York Times Company]] |date=January 21, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240213083434/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/magazine/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html |archive-date=February 13, 2024 |url-access=subscription |access-date=February 21, 2024 |issn=0028-7822 }}</ref>
Long-term shifts in conservative thinking following the election of Trump have been described as a "new [[fusionism]]" of traditional conservative ideology and right-wing populist themes.<ref name="New Fusionism"/> These have resulted in shifts towards greater support of [[national conservatism]],<ref>{{cite news |title=The growing peril of national conservatism |url=https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/02/15/the-growing-peril-of-national-conservatism |work=[[The Economist]] |date=February 15, 2024 |access-date=February 15, 2024 |archive-date=February 15, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240215195332/https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/02/15/the-growing-peril-of-national-conservatism |url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref> protectionism,<ref>{{cite news |title=The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation |url=https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/10/26/the-republican-party-no-longer-believes-america-is-the-essential-nation |work=[[The Economist]] |date=October 26, 2023 |access-date=February 14, 2024 |archive-date=February 13, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240213131705/https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/10/26/the-republican-party-no-longer-believes-america-is-the-essential-nation |url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref> [[cultural conservatism]], a more [[Realism (international relations)|realist]] foreign policy, a repudiation of [[neoconservatism]], reduced efforts to roll back entitlement programs, and a disdain for traditional checks and balances.<ref name="New Fusionism">{{Cite journal |last1=Ashbee |first1=Edward |last2=Waddan|first2=Alex|date=13 December 2023 |title=US Republicans and the New Fusionism |journal=[[The Political Quarterly]] |language=en |doi=10.1111/1467-923X.13341 |issn=1467-923X }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |last=Garcia-Navarro |first=Lulu |title=Inside the Heritage Foundation's Plans for 'Institutionalizing Trumpism' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/magazine/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html |magazine=[[The New York Times Magazine]] |location=[[New York City]] |publisher=[[The New York Times Company]] |date=January 21, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240213083434/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/magazine/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html |archive-date=February 13, 2024 |url-access=subscription |access-date=February 21, 2024 |issn=0028-7822 }}</ref>


==== Moderates ====<!-- "Moderate Republican" and "Moderate Republicans" redirect here. See MOSHIDDENLINKADVICE if you change the header.-->
=== Christian right ===
{{see also|Center-right politics|Republican Governance Group|Moderate conservatism|Problem Solvers Caucus}}
{{main|Christian right|Social conservatism in the United States}}
{{see also|Christian nationalism#United States|United States anti-abortion movement|2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States}}
The Christian right is a [[conservatism in the United States|conservative]] [[Christianity and politics|Christian]] [[political faction]] characterized by strong support of [[social conservatism|socially conservative]] and [[Christian nationalism|Christian nationalist]] policies.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Whitehead |first1=Andrew L. |last2=Perry |first2=Samuel L. |last3=Baker |first3=Joseph O. |title=Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election |journal=Sociology of Religion |volume=79 |issue=2 |date=25 January 2018 |pages=147–171 |doi=10.1093/socrel/srx070 |quote=The current study establishes that, independent of these influences, voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States' perceived Christian heritage. Data from a national probability sample of Americans surveyed soon after the 2016 election shows that greater adherence to Christian nationalist ideology was a robust predictor of voting for Trump, even after controlling for economic dissatisfaction, sexism, anti-black prejudice, anti-Muslim refugee attitudes, and anti-immigrant sentiment, as well as measures of religion, sociodemographics, and political identity more generally.}}</ref><ref name = "AP Christian">{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Peter |date=February 17, 2024 |title=Many believe the founders wanted a Christian America. Some want the government to declare one now |url=https://apnews.com/article/american-founders-christian-nation-conservative-beliefs-4ea388e8d80c54016a6a4460cbef9b82 |url-status=live |work=Associated Press |location=New York |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240219033711/https://apnews.com/article/american-founders-christian-nation-conservative-beliefs-4ea388e8d80c54016a6a4460cbef9b82 |archive-date=February 19, 2024 |access-date=February 22, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Politico Christian">{{cite web |last1=Rouse |first1=Stella |last2=Telhami |first2=Shibley |title=Most Republicans Support Declaring the United States a Christian Nation |url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736 |website=Politico |access-date=February 22, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927001816/https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736 |archive-date=September 27, 2022 |date=September 21, 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> Christian conservatives seek to use the teachings of Christianity to influence law and public policy.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Anderson |first1=Margaret L. |last2=Taylor|first2=Howard Francis |date=2006 |title=Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LP9bIrZ9xacC&pg=PA469 |location=Belmont, CA |publisher=Thomson Wadsworth |page= |isbn=978-0-534-61716-5}}</ref>


Moderate Republicans tend to be conservative-to-moderate on fiscal issues and moderate-to-liberal on social issues, and usually represent [[swing state]]s or [[Red states and blue states|blue states]]. Moderate Republican voters are typically [[Educational attainment in the United States|highly educated]], affluent, socially moderate or liberal and often [[Never Trump movement|Never Trump]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cohn |first=Nate |date=August 17, 2023 |title=The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231012095530/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |archive-date=October 12, 2023 |access-date=October 9, 2023 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Ideologically, such Republicans resemble the [[conservative liberalism|conservative liberals]] of Europe.<ref>{{cite book |last=Slomp |first=Hans |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Europe_A_Political_Profile_2_volumes/tkPPEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22if+transplanted+to+the+united+states,+they+would+occupy%22&pg=PA107&printsec=frontcover |title=Europe: A Political Profile |publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]] |year=2011 |volume=1 |page=107 |quote=Most European liberals are Conservative Liberals, located at the right end of the left-right line, exactly opposite the American liberals' position. If transplanted to the United States, they would occupy the Left wing and the center of the Republican Party. Only the less numerous social liberals resemble American liberals.}}</ref>
In the United States, the Christian right is an informal coalition formed around a core of [[Evangelicalism in the United States|evangelical Protestants]] and conservative [[Catholic Church in the United States|Roman Catholics]], as well as a large number of [[the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|Latter-day Saints (Mormons)]].<ref name="Deckman2004">{{cite book|last= Deckman|first= Melissa Marie|author-link=Melissa Deckman|title= School Board Battles: The Christian Right in Local Politics|url=https://archive.org/details/schoolboardbattl0000deck|url-access= registration|access-date= April 10, 2014|year= 2004|publisher= Georgetown University Press|isbn= 9781589010017|page= [https://archive.org/details/schoolboardbattl0000deck/page/48 48]|quote= More than half of all Christian right candidates attend evangelical Protestant churches, which are more theologically liberal. A relatively large number of Christian Right candidates (24 percent) are Catholics; however, when asked to describe themselves as either "progressive/liberal" or "traditional/conservative" Catholics, 88 percent of these Christian right candidates place themselves in the traditional category.}}</ref><ref name=Schweber2012>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-schweber/the-catholicization-of-th_b_1298435.html|title= The Catholicization of the American Right|last= Schweber|first= Howard|work= The Huffington Post|access-date= February 24, 2012|date= February 24, 2012}}</ref><ref name = "Catholic">{{cite book|title= School Board Battles: the Christian right in Local Politics|url=https://archive.org/details/schoolboardbattl0000deck|url-access= registration|author= Melissa Marie Deckman|year= 2004|author-link=Melissa Deckman|publisher= [[Georgetown University Press]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=April 27, 2015|title=Five things you should know about Mormon politics|url=https://religionnews.com/2015/04/27/five-things-know-mormon-politics/|access-date=July 16, 2020|website=Religion News Service|language=en-US}}</ref> The movement has its roots in [[American politics]] going back as far as the 1940s and has been especially influential since the 1970s.<ref name=hartsem>{{cite web|url=http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Cright.htm|title=Christian Right |website=hirr.hartsem.edu|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303230556/http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Cright.htm|archive-date=March 3, 2016}}</ref> In the late 20th century, the Christian right became strongly connected to the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/us/religion-politics-evangelicals.html|title=Religion and Right-Wing Politics: How Evangelicals Reshaped Elections|first=Clyde|last=Haberman|work=The New York Times |date=October 28, 2018|access-date=February 23, 2019|via=NYTimes.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181029015238/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/us/religion-politics-evangelicals.html|archive-date=Oct 29, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Republican politicians associated with the Christian right in the 21st century include Tennessee Senator [[Marsha Blackburn]], former Arkansas Governor [[Mike Huckabee]], and former Senator [[Rick Santorum]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/06/upshot/mike-huckabee-and-the-continuing-influence-of-evangelicals.html|title=Mike Huckabee and the Continuing Influence of Evangelicals|first=Nate|last=Cohn|work=The New York Times |date=May 5, 2015|access-date=February 23, 2019|via=NYTimes.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150506151326/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/06/upshot/mike-huckabee-and-the-continuing-influence-of-evangelicals.html|archive-date=May 6, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Many within the Christian right have also identified as [[social conservatives]], which sociologist [[Harry F. Dahms]] has described as Christian doctrinal conservatives ([[Anti-abortion movement|anti-abortion]], [[List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality|anti-LGBT rights]]) and gun-rights conservatives (pro-NRA) as the two domains of ideology within social conservatism.<ref>{{cite book |author-first=Robert B. |author-last=Smith |title=Mediations of Social Life in the 21st Century |chapter=Social Conservatism, Distractors, and Authoritarianism: Axiological versus instrumental rationality |editor-first=Harry F. |editor-last=Dahms |date=2014|publisher=Emerald Group Publishing|isbn=9781784412227|page=101|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C5V1BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA101|language=en}}</ref> Christian nationalists generally seek to declare the U.S. a Christian nation, enforce [[Christian values]], and overturn the [[Separation of church and state in the United States|separation of church and state]].<ref name="AP Christian" /><ref name="Politico Christian" />


While they sometimes share the economic views of other Republicans (i.e. [[tax cuts|lower taxes]], [[deregulation]], and [[welfare reform]]), moderate Republicans differ in that some are for [[affirmative action in the United States|affirmative action]],<ref name="washpost" /> [[LGBT rights in the United States|LGBT rights and same-sex marriage]], legal access to and even public funding for [[abortion debate|abortion]], [[Gun politics in the United States|gun control]] laws, more [[environmental regulation]] and action on [[climate change]], fewer restrictions on [[immigration]] and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and [[stem cell controversy|embryonic stem cell research]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Silverleib |first=Alan |title=Analysis: An autopsy of liberal Republicans |url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/06/liberal.republicans/ |access-date=October 14, 2018 |website=cnn.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Pear |first=Robert |date=June 19, 2001 |title=Several G.O.P. Senators Back Money for Stem Cell Research |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/19/us/several-gop-senators-back-money-for-stem-cell-research.html |access-date=October 14, 2018 |work=The New York Times |language=en}}</ref> In the 21st century, some former Republican moderates have switched to the Democratic Party.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Tatum |first1=Sophie |date=December 20, 2018 |title=3 Kansas legislators switch from Republican to Democrat |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/19/politics/kansas-legislature-republican-democrat/index.html |access-date=January 8, 2021 |website=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Weiner |first1=Rachel |title=Charlie Crist defends party switch |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2012/12/10/charlie-crist-defends-party-switch/ |access-date=January 8, 2021 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Hornick |first1=Ed |last2=Walsh |first2=Deidre |title=Longtime GOP Sen. Arlen Specter becomes Democrat |url=https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/28/specter.party.switch/ |access-date=January 8, 2021 |website=CNN}}</ref>
===Trumpists===
{{main|Trumpism}}
{{see also|Right-wing populism|Radical right (United States)|National conservatism|List of politicians associated with Trumpism}}
Sometimes referred to as the MAGA or "America First" movement,<ref name="University of Washington 2021">{{cite web | title=Panel Study of the MAGA Movement | website=University of Washington | date=January 6, 2021 | url=https://sites.uw.edu/magastudy/ | access-date=March 24, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Gabbatt Smith 2023">{{cite web | last=Gabbatt | first=Adam | last2=Smith | first2=David | title='America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump | website=the Guardian | date=August 19, 2023 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/19/vivek-ramaswamy-republican-presidential-nomination-candidate | access-date=March 24, 2024}}</ref> Trumpists are the dominant faction in the Republican Party as of 2024.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ball |first1=Molly |title=The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism |url=https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/gop-new-hampshire-trump-haley-403080ca |access-date=February 22, 2024 |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=January 23, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240124014202/https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/gop-new-hampshire-trump-haley-403080ca |archive-date=January 24, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Biebricher-2023">{{Cite journal |last1=Biebricher |first1=Thomas |date=October 25, 2023 |title=The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective |journal=Politische Vierteljahresschrift |language=en |doi=10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2 |issn=2075-4698 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Arhin-2023">{{Cite journal |last1=Arhin |first1=Kofi |last2=Stockemer |first2=Daniel |last3=Normandin |first3=Marie-Soleil |date=May 29, 2023 |title=THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other? |journal=[[World Affairs]] |language=en |volume=186 |issue=3 |doi=10.1177/0043820023117681 |issn=1940-1582 |doi-access=free |quote= In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP).}}</ref><ref name="Punchbowl Old GOP">{{Cite news |last1=Desiderio |first1=Andrew |last2=Sherman |first2=Jake |last3=Bresnahan |first3=John |date=February 7, 2024 |title=The end of the Old GOP |language=en-US |work=[[Punchbowl News]] |url=https://punchbowl.news/article/the-end-of-the-old-republican-party-senate-conference/ |access-date=February 8, 2024 |archive-date=February 7, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240207114758/https://punchbowl.news/article/the-end-of-the-old-republican-party-senate-conference/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Aratani2021">{{cite news |last1=Aratani |first1=Lauren |title=Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/26/republicans-minimum-wage-bills-senate |access-date=7 September 2021 |work=The Guardian |date=26 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814230535/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/26/republicans-minimum-wage-bills-senate |archive-date=14 August 2021 |quote=In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.}}</ref> It has been described as consisting of a range of right-wing ideologies including but not limited to [[right-wing populism]],<ref name="campani">{{Cite journal |last1=Campani |first1=Giovanna |last2=Fabelo Concepción |first2=Sunamis |last3=Rodriguez Soler |first3=Angel |last4=Sánchez Savín |first4=Claudia |date=December 2022 |title=The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse |journal=Societies |language=en |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=154 |doi=10.3390/soc12060154 |issn=2075-4698 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Norris |first=Pippa |date=November 2020 |title=Measuring populism worldwide |journal=Party Politics |language=en |volume=26 |issue=6 |pages=697–717 |doi=10.1177/1354068820927686 |s2cid=216298689 |issn=1354-0688|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Cassidy">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/donald-trump-is-transforming-the-g-o-p-into-a-populist-nativist-party|title=Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party|last=Cassidy|first=John|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|date=February 29, 2016|access-date=July 22, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304225035/http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/donald-trump-is-transforming-the-g-o-p-into-a-populist-nativist-party|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> [[national conservatism]],<ref name="Economist Feb152024">{{cite news |date=February 15, 2024 |title="National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism |url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/02/15/national-conservatives-are-forging-a-global-front-against-liberalism |url-status=live |work=[[The Economist]] |location=[[London]] |publisher=The Economist Group |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240220205122/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/02/15/national-conservatives-are-forging-a-global-front-against-liberalism |archive-date=February 20, 2024 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> [[neo-nationalism]],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zhou |first1=Shaoqing |title=The origins, characteristics and trends of neo-nationalism in the 21st century |journal=International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology |volume=6 |issue=1 |date=December 8, 2022 |doi=10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4 |url=https://ijae.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4#citeas |access-date=February 23, 2024 |archive-date=February 23, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240223032432/https://ijae.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4 |url-status=live |doi-access=free |quote=On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism.|pmc=9735003 }}</ref> and [[Trumpism]], the political movement associated with [[Donald Trump]] and his base.<ref name="Katzenstein2019">{{cite news |last1=Katzenstein |first1=Peter J. |author-link=Peter J. Katzenstein |title=Trumpism is US |url=https://www.wzb.eu/en/news/trumpism-is-us |access-date=11 September 2021 |work=WZB {{!}} Berlin Social Science Center |date=20 March 2019}}</ref><ref name="DiSalvo2022">{{cite magazine |last1=DiSalvo |first1=Daniel |author-link=Daniel DiSalvo |date=Fall 2022 |title=Party Factions and American Politics |url=https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/party-factions-and-american-politics |journal=National Affairs |access-date=April 11, 2023 |archive-date=March 23, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230323210441/https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/party-factions-and-american-politics |url-status=live }}</ref> They have been described by some commentators, including Joseph Lowndes, James A. Gardner, and Guy-Uriel Charles, as the American political variant of the [[Radical right (United States)|far-right]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lowndes |first1=Joseph |editor-last=de la Torre |editor-first=Carlos |title=Routledge Handbook of Global Populism |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gm5uDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT270 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |chapter=Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump |isbn=978-1315226446 |year=2019 |location=London & New York |at="Trumpism" section, pp. 197–200 |quote=Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Bennhold |first1=Katrin |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/07/world/europe/germany-trump-far-right.html |title=Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right |date=September 7, 2020 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120233123/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/07/world/europe/germany-trump-far-right.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Gardner Charles 2023 p. 31">{{cite book | last1=Gardner | first1=J.A. | last2=Charles | first2=G.U. | title=Election Law in the American Political System | publisher=Aspen Publishing | series=Aspen Casebook Series | year=2023 | isbn=978-1-5438-2683-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZViqEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 | access-date=2023-12-31 | page=31}}</ref>


Prominent 21st century moderate Republicans include Senators [[Lisa Murkowski]] of Alaska and [[Susan Collins]] of Maine<ref>{{cite web |last=Plott |first=Elaina |date=October 6, 2018 |title=Two Moderate Senators, Two Very Different Paths |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/collins-murkowski-key-votes-kavanaugh-confirmation/572407/ |access-date=February 23, 2019 |website=The Atlantic}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Faludi |first=Susan |date=July 5, 2018 |title=Opinion - Senators Collins and Murkowski, It's Time to Leave the G.O.P. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/opinion/collins-murkowski-change-parties.html |access-date=February 23, 2019 |work=The New York Times |via=NYTimes.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Petre |first=Linda |date=September 25, 2018 |title=Kavanaugh's fate rests with Sen. Collins |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408193-kavanaughs-fate-rests-with-sen-collins/ |access-date=February 23, 2019 |website=TheHill}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Connolly |first1=Griffin |date=October 9, 2018 |title=Sen. Lisa Murkowski Could Face Reprisal from Alaska GOP |url=https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/sen-lisa-murkowski-face-reprisal-alaska-gop |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181011013657/https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/sen-lisa-murkowski-face-reprisal-alaska-gop |archive-date=October 11, 2018 |access-date=February 23, 2019 |website=rollcall.com}}</ref> and several current or former governors of northeastern states, such as [[Charlie Baker]] of Massachusetts<ref>{{cite web |last=Bacon |first=Perry |date=March 30, 2018 |title=How A Massachusetts Republican Became One Of America's Most Popular Politicians |url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-a-massachusetts-republican-became-one-of-americas-most-popular-politicians/ |access-date=February 23, 2019 |website=fivethirtyeight.com}}</ref> and [[Phil Scott]] of Vermont.<ref>{{Cite web |date=November 18, 2021 |title=If moderate Republicans don't want to go to Washington, how will things ever change? |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/11/18/metro/if-moderate-republicans-dont-want-go-washington-how-will-things-ever-change/ |website=BostonGlobe.com}}</ref> Another moderate Republican is incumbent governor of Nevada [[Joe Lombardo]], who was previously the [[Sheriff of Clark County]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 31, 2023 |title=Nevada governor signs new abortion protections into law |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/nevada-gop-governor-signs-new-abortion-protections-law-rcna87022 |website=NBC News}}</ref> Moderate Republican Representatives include [[Brian Fitzpatrick (American politician)|Brian Fitzpatrick]], [[Don Bacon]], and ex-Representative [[John Katko]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=These Are the Most Bipartisan Politicians - No Labels |url=https://www.nolabels.org/these-are-the-most-bipartisan-politicians |access-date=2024-04-07 |website=www.nolabels.org |language=en}}</ref>
Despite producing no manifesto,<ref name="SpiegeleireSkinnerSweijs2017">{{cite book |last1=Spiegeleire |first1=Stephan De |last2=Skinner |first2=Clarissa |last3=Sweijs |first3=Tim |title=The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From, and What It Means for International Security and Defense |year=2017 |publisher=The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies |isbn=978-94-92102-59-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aY19DwAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PR6}}</ref> the Trumpist faction supports cuts to spending.<ref name="Chatelain 2023 d086">{{cite web | last=Chatelain | first=Ryan | title=Freedom Caucus issues demands for raising debt limit | website=Spectrum News NY1 | date=2023-03-10 | url=https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/03/10/freedom-caucus-issues-demands-for-raising-debt-limit | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Feagin |first=Joe R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tPGyEAAAQBAJ |title=White Minority Nation: Past, Present and Future |date=2023-04-25 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-86223-2 |language=en}}</ref> In international relations, Trumpists support U.S. aid to Israel but not to Ukraine,<ref name="Falk 2023 t804">{{cite web | last=Falk | first=Thomas O | title=Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine? | website=Al Jazeera | date=2023-11-08 | url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/8/why-are-us-republicans-pushing-for-aid-to-israel-but-not-ukraine | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Riccardi |first=Nicholas |date=February 19, 2024 |title=Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4492514-gop-strained-by-trump-influenced-shift-from-reagan-on-russia/ |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[Associated Press]]}}</ref> are generally supportive towards [[Russia]],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lillis |first=Mike |date=February 28, 2024 |title=GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4492514-gop-strained-by-trump-influenced-shift-from-reagan-on-russia/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240228121816/https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4492514-gop-strained-by-trump-influenced-shift-from-reagan-on-russia/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 28, 2024 |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|quote=Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ball |first=Molly |date=February 23, 2024 |title=How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine |url=https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/how-trump-turned-conservatives-against-helping-ukraine-d9f75b3b |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Jonathan |first=Chait |date=February 23, 2024 |title=Russian Dolls Trump has finally remade Republicans into Putin's playthings. |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-republicans-vladimir-putin-puppets.html |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[New York (magazine)|Intelligencer]]|quote=But during his time in office and after, Trump managed to create, from the grassroots up, a Republican constituency for Russia-friendly policy ... Conservatives vying to be the Trumpiest of them all have realized that supporting Russia translates in the Republican mind as a proxy for supporting Trump. Hence the politicians most willing to defend his offenses against democratic norms — Marjorie Taylor Greene, Jim Jordan, Tommy Tuberville, Mike Lee, J. D. Vance — hold the most anti-Ukraine or pro-Russia views. Conversely, the least-Trumpy Republicans, such as Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney, have the most hawkish views on Russia. The rapid growth of Trump's once-unique pro-Russia stance is a gravitational function of his personality cult.}}</ref> and favor an [[isolationism|isolationist]] "[[America First (policy)|America First]]" foreign policy agenda.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lange |first=Jason |date=January 17, 2024 |title=Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-rise-sparks-isolationist-worries-among-us-allies-americans-focus-home-2024-01-17/ |access-date=January 17, 2024 |website=[[Reuters]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/09/us/politics/trump-2025-nato.html |work=New York Times |date=December 9, 2023|access-date=December 10, 2023|last1=Swan|first1=Jonathan|last2=Savage|first2=Charlie|last3=Haberman|first3=Maggie}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Baker|first=Peter|title=Favoring Foes Over Friends, Trump Threatens to Upend International Order|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/11/us/politics/trump-nato.html|work=The New York Times |date=February 11, 2024|access-date=February 21, 2024|issn=1553-8095|language=en|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref name="Cohn2023">{{Cite news |last=Cohn |first=Nate |date=August 17, 2023 |title=The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |access-date=October 9, 2023 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=October 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231012095530/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |url-status=live }}</ref> They generally reject compromise within the party and with the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats]],<ref name="Collinson 2023 n804">{{cite web | last=Collinson | first=Stephen | title=McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution | website=CNN | date=2023-10-04 | url=https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/04/politics/mccarthy-victim-trump-gop-revolution/index.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref name="Rocha 2023 k444">{{cite web | last=Rocha | first=Alander | title=Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them' | website=AL | date=2023-09-07 | url=https://www.al.com/news/2023/09/mike-rogers-says-far-right-wing-of-gop-act-like-my-kids-you-cant-get-rid-of-them.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref> and are willing to oust fellow Republican office holders they deem to be too moderate.<ref name="Macpherson 2021 r371">{{cite web | last=Macpherson | first=James | title=Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party | website=AP News | date=2021-07-24 | url=https://apnews.com/article/government-and-politics-north-dakota-8fce64375abe042324cf26b4c82d57bf | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref name="Times-Herald.com 2023 x358">{{cite web | title=Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future | website=The Times Herald | date=2023-05-15 | url=https://www.times-herald.com/opinion/fringe-activists-threaten-georgia-gop-s-political-future/article_b3fd5a4a-f33f-11ed-901d-7fbbbf28e09e.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref> Compared to other Republicans, the Trumpist faction is more likely to be immigration restrictionists,<ref name="auto3">{{cite book |last1=Baker |first1=Paula |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=547UDwAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Handbook of American Political History |last2=Critchlow |first2=Donald T. |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2020 |isbn=978-0190628697 |page=387 |quote="Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base." |via=Google Books |access-date=April 23, 2021 |archive-date=December 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231215023724/https://books.google.com/books?id=547UDwAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> and to be against [[free trade]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Kent |title=Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2021 |isbn=978-0190086350 |chapter=Populism, Trade, and Trump's Path to Victory}}</ref> [[neoconservatism]],<ref>{{Cite magazine |last1=Smith |first1=Jordan Michael |last2=Logis |first2=Rich |last3=Logis |first3=Rich |last4=Shephard |first4=Alex |last5=Shephard |first5=Alex |last6=Kipnis |first6=Laura |last7=Kipnis |first7=Laura |last8=Haas |first8=Lidija |last9=Haas |first9=Lidija |date=October 17, 2022 |title=The Neocons Are Losing. Why Aren't We Happy? |magazine=The New Republic |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/168045/neoconservative-isolationism-republican-party |access-date=May 5, 2023 |issn=0028-6583 |archive-date=May 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230505163722/https://newrepublic.com/article/168045/neoconservative-isolationism-republican-party |url-status=live }}</ref> and [[Environmentalism|environmental protection laws]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Arias-Maldonado |first=Manuel |date=January 2020 |title=Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism |journal=Sustainability |language=en |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=2538 |doi=10.3390/su12062538 |issn=2071-1050 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


One of the most high-ranking moderate Republicans in recent history was [[Colin Powell]] as Secretary of State in the first term of the [[George W. Bush]] administration (Powell left the Republican Party in January 2021 following the [[2021 storming of the United States Capitol]], and had endorsed every Democrat for president in the general election since 2008).<ref name="nolongerconsider">{{cite news |last1=Pitofsky |first1=Marina |date=January 10, 2021 |title=Colin Powell: 'I can no longer call myself a fellow Republican' |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/533575-colin-powell-i-can-no-longer-call-myself-a-fellow-republican/ |access-date=January 11, 2021 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]}}</ref>
The Republican Party's populist and far-right movements emerged in occurrence with a global increase in populist movements in the 2010s and 2020s,<ref name = "Isaac2017">{{cite journal |last1=Isaac |first1=Jeffrey |title=Making America Great Again? |journal=Perspectives on Politics |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=15 |issue=3 |date=November 2017 |pages=625–631 |doi=10.1017/S1537592717000871 |doi-access=free }}</ref> coupled with entrenchment and increased partisanship within the party since 2010, fueled by the rise of the [[Tea Party movement]] which has also been described as far-right.<ref name="Blum pp. 88–109">{{cite journal | last=Blum | first=Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike | title=How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era | journal=British Journal of Political Science | date=2024 | publisher=Cambridge University Press | volume=54 | issue=1 | pages=88–109 | doi=10.1017/S0007123423000224 | url=https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i1p88-109_5.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref> The election of Trump in 2016 split the party into pro-Trump and [[Never Trump movement|anti-Trump]] factions.<ref name ="Johnson-McCray-Ragusa 2018">{{Cite journal|last1=Johnson|first1=Lauren R.|last2=McCray|first2=Deon|last3=Ragusa|first3=Jordan M.|date=January 11, 2018|title=#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election|journal=Research & Politics|language=en|volume=5|issue=1|doi=10.1177/2053168017749383|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Swartz2022">{{Cite journal |last1=Swartz |first1=David L. |date=27 May 2022 |title=Trump divide among American conservative professors |journal=[[Theory & Society]] |language=en |volume=52 |issue=5 |pages=739–769 |doi=10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4 |issn=1573-7853 |doi-access=free |pmc=10224651 }}</ref>


The [[Republican Governance Group]] is a caucus of moderate Republicans within the House of Representatives.<ref name="auto" />
When conservative columnist [[George Will]] advised voters of all ideologies to vote for Democratic candidates in the Senate and House elections of November 2018,<ref name="Will2018">{{cite news |last1=Will |first1=George |title=Opinion {{!}} Vote against the GOP this November |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html? |newspaper=Washington Post |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916042046/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html |archive-date=16 September 2018 |date=June 22, 2018}}</ref> political writer Dan McLaughlin at the ''National Review'' responded that doing so would make the Trumpist faction even more powerful within the Republican party.<ref name="McLaughlin">{{cite web |last1=McLaughlin |first1=Dan |title=Don't Throw the Republicans Out: A Response to George Will |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/george-will-endorses-democrats-terrible-idea/ |website=National Review |access-date=5 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180625221045/https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/george-will-endorses-democrats-terrible-idea/ |archive-date=25 June 2018 |date=25 June 2018}}</ref> Anticipating Trump's likely defeat in the U.S. presidential election held on November 3, 2020, [[Peter Feaver]] wrote in ''[[Foreign Policy]]'' magazine: "With victory having been so close, the Trumpist faction in the party will be empowered and in no mood to compromise or reform."<ref name="Feaver2020">{{cite journal |last1=Feaver |first1=Peter |title=What Trump's Near-Victory Means for Republican Foreign Policy |journal=Foreign Policy |date=November 5, 2020 |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/05/trump-election-republican-foreign-policy/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105195928/https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/05/trump-election-republican-foreign-policy/ |archive-date=November 5, 2020 |access-date=6 November 2022}}</ref> A poll conducted in February 2021 indicated that a plurality of Republicans (46% versus 27%) would leave the Republican Party to join a new party if Trump chose to create it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/02/21/exclusive-trump-party-he-still-holds-loyalty-gop-voters/6765406002|title=Exclusive: Defeated and impeached, Trump still commands the loyalty of the GOP's voters|first=Susan Page and Sarah|last=Elbeshbishi|website=USA TODAY}}</ref> Nick Beauchamp, assistant professor of political science at [[Northeastern University]], says he sees the country as divided into four parties, with two factions representing each of the Democratic and Republican parties: "For the GOP, there's the Trump faction—which is the larger group—and the non-Trump faction".<ref name="Stening2022">{{cite news |last1=Stening |first1=Tanner |title=Do political endorsements still matter? |url=https://news.northeastern.edu/2022/05/26/do-political-endorsements-matter/ |access-date=5 November 2022 |work=News @ Northeastern |date=26 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220527142633/https://news.northeastern.edu/2022/05/26/do-political-endorsements-matter/ |archive-date=27 May 2022}}</ref>


==== Christian right ====
Lilliana Mason, associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, states that Donald Trump solidified the trend among Southern white conservative Democrats since the 1960s of leaving the Democratic Party and joining the Republican Party: "Trump basically worked as a lightning rod to finalize that process of creating the Republican Party as a single entity for defending the high status of white, Christian, rural Americans. It's not a huge percentage of Americans that holds these beliefs, and it's not even the entire Republican Party; it's just about half of it. But the party itself is controlled by this intolerant, very strongly pro-Trump faction."<ref name="Homans2022">{{cite news |last1=Homans |first1=Charles |title=Where Does American Democracy Go From Here? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/03/17/magazine/democracy.html |access-date=5 November 2022 |work=The New York Times |date=17 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220317090219/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/03/17/magazine/democracy.html |archive-date=17 March 2022}}</ref>
{{main|Christian right|Social conservatism in the United States}}
{{see also|Christian nationalism#United States|United States anti-abortion movement|2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States}}
The Christian right is a [[conservatism in the United States|conservative]] [[Christianity and politics|Christian]] [[political faction]] characterized by strong support of [[social conservatism|socially conservative]] and [[Christian nationalism|Christian nationalist]] policies.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Whitehead |first1=Andrew L. |last2=Perry |first2=Samuel L. |last3=Baker |first3=Joseph O. |title=Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election |journal=Sociology of Religion |volume=79 |issue=2 |date=25 January 2018 |pages=147–171 |doi=10.1093/socrel/srx070 |quote=The current study establishes that, independent of these influences, voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States' perceived Christian heritage. Data from a national probability sample of Americans surveyed soon after the 2016 election shows that greater adherence to Christian nationalist ideology was a robust predictor of voting for Trump, even after controlling for economic dissatisfaction, sexism, anti-black prejudice, anti-Muslim refugee attitudes, and anti-immigrant sentiment, as well as measures of religion, sociodemographics, and political identity more generally.}}</ref><ref name = "AP Christian">{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Peter |date=February 17, 2024 |title=Many believe the founders wanted a Christian America. Some want the government to declare one now |url=https://apnews.com/article/american-founders-christian-nation-conservative-beliefs-4ea388e8d80c54016a6a4460cbef9b82 |url-status=live |work=Associated Press |location=New York |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240219033711/https://apnews.com/article/american-founders-christian-nation-conservative-beliefs-4ea388e8d80c54016a6a4460cbef9b82 |archive-date=February 19, 2024 |access-date=February 22, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Politico Christian">{{cite web |last1=Rouse |first1=Stella |last2=Telhami |first2=Shibley |title=Most Republicans Support Declaring the United States a Christian Nation |url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736 |website=Politico |access-date=February 22, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927001816/https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736 |archive-date=September 27, 2022 |date=September 21, 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> Christian conservatives seek to use the teachings of Christianity to influence law and public policy.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Anderson |first1=Margaret L. |last2=Taylor|first2=Howard Francis |date=2006 |title=Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LP9bIrZ9xacC&pg=PA469 |location=Belmont, CA |publisher=Thomson Wadsworth |page= |isbn=978-0-534-61716-5}}</ref>


In the United States, the Christian right is an informal coalition formed around a core of [[Evangelicalism in the United States|evangelical Protestants]] and conservative [[Catholic Church in the United States|Roman Catholics]], as well as a large number of [[the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|Latter-day Saints (Mormons)]].<ref name="Deckman2004">{{cite book|last= Deckman|first= Melissa Marie|author-link=Melissa Deckman|title= School Board Battles: The Christian Right in Local Politics|url=https://archive.org/details/schoolboardbattl0000deck|url-access= registration|access-date= April 10, 2014|year= 2004|publisher= Georgetown University Press|isbn= 9781589010017|page= [https://archive.org/details/schoolboardbattl0000deck/page/48 48]|quote= More than half of all Christian right candidates attend evangelical Protestant churches, which are more theologically liberal. A relatively large number of Christian Right candidates (24 percent) are Catholics; however, when asked to describe themselves as either "progressive/liberal" or "traditional/conservative" Catholics, 88 percent of these Christian right candidates place themselves in the traditional category.}}</ref><ref name=Schweber2012>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-schweber/the-catholicization-of-th_b_1298435.html|title= The Catholicization of the American Right|last= Schweber|first= Howard|work= The Huffington Post|access-date= February 24, 2012|date= February 24, 2012}}</ref><ref name = "Catholic">{{cite book|title= School Board Battles: the Christian right in Local Politics|url=https://archive.org/details/schoolboardbattl0000deck|url-access= registration|author= Melissa Marie Deckman|year= 2004|author-link=Melissa Deckman|publisher= [[Georgetown University Press]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=April 27, 2015|title=Five things you should know about Mormon politics|url=https://religionnews.com/2015/04/27/five-things-know-mormon-politics/|access-date=July 16, 2020|website=Religion News Service|language=en-US}}</ref> The movement has its roots in [[American politics]] going back as far as the 1940s and has been especially influential since the 1970s.<ref name=hartsem>{{cite web|url=http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Cright.htm|title=Christian Right |website=hirr.hartsem.edu|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303230556/http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Cright.htm|archive-date=March 3, 2016}}</ref> In the late 20th century, the Christian right became strongly connected to the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/us/religion-politics-evangelicals.html|title=Religion and Right-Wing Politics: How Evangelicals Reshaped Elections|first=Clyde|last=Haberman|work=The New York Times |date=October 28, 2018|access-date=February 23, 2019|via=NYTimes.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181029015238/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/us/religion-politics-evangelicals.html|archive-date=Oct 29, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Republican politicians associated with the Christian right in the 21st century include Tennessee Senator [[Marsha Blackburn]], former Arkansas Governor [[Mike Huckabee]], and former Senator [[Rick Santorum]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/06/upshot/mike-huckabee-and-the-continuing-influence-of-evangelicals.html|title=Mike Huckabee and the Continuing Influence of Evangelicals|first=Nate|last=Cohn|work=The New York Times |date=May 5, 2015|access-date=February 23, 2019|via=NYTimes.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150506151326/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/06/upshot/mike-huckabee-and-the-continuing-influence-of-evangelicals.html|archive-date=May 6, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Many within the Christian right have also identified as [[social conservatives]], which sociologist [[Harry F. Dahms]] has described as Christian doctrinal conservatives ([[Anti-abortion movement|anti-abortion]], [[List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality|anti-LGBT rights]]) and gun-rights conservatives (pro-NRA) as the two domains of ideology within social conservatism.<ref>{{cite book |author-first=Robert B. |author-last=Smith |title=Mediations of Social Life in the 21st Century |chapter=Social Conservatism, Distractors, and Authoritarianism: Axiological versus instrumental rationality |editor-first=Harry F. |editor-last=Dahms |date=2014|publisher=Emerald Group Publishing|isbn=9781784412227|page=101|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C5V1BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA101|language=en}}</ref> Christian nationalists generally seek to declare the U.S. a Christian nation, enforce [[Christian values]], and overturn the [[Separation of church and state in the United States|separation of church and state]].<ref name="AP Christian" /><ref name="Politico Christian" />
Rachel Kleinfeld, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, describes it as an authoritarian, antidemocratic movement that has successfully weaponized cultural issues, and that cultivates a narrative placing white people, Christians, and men at the top of a status hierarchy as its response to the so-called "[[Great Replacement in the United States|Great Replacement]]" theory, a claim that minorities, immigrants, and women, enabled by Democrats, Jews, and elites, are displacing white people, Christians, and men from their rightful positions in American society.<ref name="Kleinfeld2022">{{cite web |last1=Kleinfeld |first1=Rachel |title=Five Strategies to Support U.S. Democracy |url=https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/09/15/five-strategies-to-support-u.s.-democracy-pub-87918 |website=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220915223727/https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/09/15/five-strategies-to-support-u.s.-democracy-pub-87918 |archive-date=15 September 2022 |date=September 15, 2022}}</ref>

In 2022, a faction emerged of Trump loyalists within the [[Freedom Caucus]] known as the '[[MAGA]] Squad', including [[Paul Gosar]], [[Marjorie Greene]], [[Matt Gaetz]], [[Madison Cawthorn]], [[Louie Gohmert]], [[Mary Miller (politician)|Mary Miller]], [[Mo Brooks]], [[Andy Biggs]], [[Scott Perry (politician)|Scott Perry]] and [[Lauren Boebert]]. While "not a formal caucus", it was described as more radical than the mainstream Freedom Caucus,<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://time.com/6186037/matt-gaetz-marjorie-taylor-greene-maga-house-republicans/ |title=How the 'MAGA Squad' Is Building Power to Control the Next Congress |date=June 14, 2022 |magazine=Time |first=Molly |last=Ball |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/greene-boebert-gosar-gaetz/2021/11/20/c77dc78a-47dd-11ec-973c-be864f938c72_story.html |title=A MAGA squad of Trump loyalists sees its influence grow amid demands for political purity among Republicans |date=November 21, 2021 |newspaper=The Washington Post |first1=Jacqueline |last1=Alemany |first2=Marianna |last2=Sotomayor |first3=Josh |last3=Dawsey |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-loyalist-boeberts-reelection-bid-recount-93075542 |title=Trump loyalist Boebert's reelection bid could go to recount |date=November 11, 2022 |work=ABC News |first=Jesse |last=Bedayn |agency=The Associated Press / [[Report for America]] |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref> and supportive of primary challenges against incumbent Republicans during the [[2022 United States House of Representatives elections]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-maga-squad/2021/12/26/654f49ea-5448-11ec-8769-2f4ecdf7a2ad_story.html |title=House MAGA squad seeks to expand by boosting challengers to fellow Republicans |date=December 26, 2021 |newspaper=The Washington Post |first=Colby |last=Itkowitz |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref><ref name="Edmondson2022">{{cite news |last1=Edmondson |first1=Catie |title=In Illinois, MAGA Congresswoman Rallies to Oust Her G.O.P. Colleague |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/28/us/politics/mary-miller-rodney-davis-il.html |work=The New York Times |date=28 June 2022}}</ref>

In a speech he gave on November 2, 2022, at Washington's Union Station near the U.S. Capitol, President Biden asserted that "the pro-Trump faction" of the Republican Party is trying to undermine the U.S. electoral system and suppress voting rights.<ref name="HeldermanAbutaleb2022">{{cite news |last1=Helderman |first1=Rosalind S. |last2=Abutaleb |first2=Yasmeen |title=Biden warns GOP could set nation on 'path to chaos' as democratic system faces strain |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/02/biden-warning-democracy-midterms-election-gop/ |access-date=5 November 2022|newspaper=Washington Post|date=November 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221103003303/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/02/biden-warning-democracy-midterms-election-gop/ |archive-date=3 November 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER|website=Wiley Online Library|access-date=February 18, 2024|date=May 29, 2023|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1177/00438200231176818}}</ref>


=== Libertarians ===
==== Libertarians ====
{{main|Libertarian Republican}}
{{main|Libertarian Republican}}
{{See also|Libertarian conservatism|Right-libertarianism|Libertarianism in the United States|Republican Liberty Caucus|Tea Party Movement}}
{{See also|Libertarian conservatism|Right-libertarianism|Libertarianism in the United States|Republican Liberty Caucus|Tea Party Movement}}
[[Libertarianism in the United States|Libertarian]]s make up a relatively small faction of the Republican Party.<ref name="pew2014"/><ref name="silver"/> In the 1950s and 60s, [[fusionism]]—the combination of [[Traditionalist conservatism in the United States|traditionalist]] and [[Social conservatism in the United States|social conservatism]] with political and economic [[right-libertarianism]]—was essential to the movement's growth.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Why Americans Hate Politics|last=Dionne Jr.|first=E.J.|publisher=Simon & Schuster|year=1991|location=New York|page=161}}</ref> This philosophy is most closely associated with [[Frank Meyer (political philosopher)|Frank Meyer]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=In Defense of Freedom and Other Essays|last=Meyer|first=Frank|publisher=Liberty Fund|year=1996|location=Indianapolis}}</ref> [[Barry Goldwater]] also had a substantial impact on the conservative-libertarian movement of the 1960s.<ref>{{Citation | first = Robert | last = Poole |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_n4_v30/ai_20954419 | title = In memoriam: Barry Goldwater | type = Obituary | newspaper = [[Reason (magazine)|Reason]] |date=August–September 1998| archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090628123204/http%3A//findarticles%2Ecom/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_n4_v30/ai_20954419/| archive-date = June 28, 2009}}</ref>


[[Libertarianism in the United States|Libertarian]]s make up a relatively small faction of the Republican Party.<ref name="pew2014" /><ref name="silver" /> In the 1950s and 60s, [[fusionism]]—the combination of [[Traditionalist conservatism in the United States|traditionalist]] and [[Social conservatism in the United States|social conservatism]] with political and economic [[right-libertarianism]]—was essential to the movement's growth.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dionne Jr. |first=E.J. |title=Why Americans Hate Politics |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=1991 |location=New York |page=161}}</ref> This philosophy is most closely associated with [[Frank Meyer (political philosopher)|Frank Meyer]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Meyer |first=Frank |title=In Defense of Freedom and Other Essays |publisher=Liberty Fund |year=1996 |location=Indianapolis}}</ref> [[Barry Goldwater]] also had a substantial impact on the conservative-libertarian movement of the 1960s.<ref>{{Citation |last=Poole |first=Robert |title=In memoriam: Barry Goldwater |date=August–September 1998 |newspaper=[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]] |type=Obituary |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_n4_v30/ai_20954419 |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090628123204/http%3A//findarticles%2Ecom/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_n4_v30/ai_20954419/ |archive-date=June 28, 2009}}</ref>
Libertarian conservatives in the 21st century favor cutting taxes and regulations, repealing the [[Affordable Care Act]], and protecting [[Gun politics in the United States|gun rights]].<ref name="NYTAnalysis">{{Cite web|url=https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/08/26/sunday-review/a-new-guide-to-the-republican-herd.html|title=A New Guide to the Republican Herd|website=archive.nytimes.com|date=August 26, 2012}}</ref> On social issues, they favor [[Right to privacy|privacy]], oppose the [[USA Patriot Act]], and oppose the [[War on Drugs]].<ref name="NYTAnalysis"/> On foreign policy, libertarian conservatives favor [[non-interventionism]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118463507387568429|title=Libertarians and the War|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|date=July 17, 2007|access-date=July 29, 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170729093522/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118463507387568429|archive-date=July 29, 2017|last1=Barnett|first1=Randy E.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cato.org/policy-report/julyaugust-2015/toward-libertarian-foreign-policy|title=Toward a Libertarian Foreign Policy|access-date=July 29, 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730020813/https://www.cato.org/policy-report/julyaugust-2015/toward-libertarian-foreign-policy|archive-date=July 30, 2017}}</ref> The [[Republican Liberty Caucus]], which describes itself as "the oldest continuously operating organization in the Liberty Republican movement with state charters nationwide", was founded in 1991.<ref name="RLCHistory">[http://rlc.org/history-rlc History of the RLC], Republican Liberty Caucus (accessed August 19, 2016).</ref> The [[House Liberty Caucus]] is a [[congressional caucus]] formed by former Representative [[Justin Amash]], a former Republican of Michigan who is now a member of the [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian Party]].<ref name="Drape">Robert Draper, [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/magazine/has-the-libertarian-moment-finally-arrived.html Has the 'Libertarian Moment' Finally Arrived?], ''New York Times Magazine'' (August 7, 2016).</ref>


Libertarian conservatives in the 21st century favor cutting taxes and regulations, repealing the [[Affordable Care Act]], and protecting [[Gun politics in the United States|gun rights]].<ref name="NYTAnalysis" /> On social issues, they favor [[Right to privacy|privacy]], oppose the [[USA Patriot Act]], and oppose the [[War on Drugs]].<ref name="NYTAnalysis" /> On foreign policy, libertarian conservatives favor [[non-interventionism]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Barnett |first1=Randy E. |date=July 17, 2007 |title=Libertarians and the War |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118463507387568429 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170729093522/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118463507387568429 |archive-date=July 29, 2017 |access-date=July 29, 2017 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Toward a Libertarian Foreign Policy |url=https://www.cato.org/policy-report/julyaugust-2015/toward-libertarian-foreign-policy |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730020813/https://www.cato.org/policy-report/julyaugust-2015/toward-libertarian-foreign-policy |archive-date=July 30, 2017 |access-date=July 29, 2017}}</ref> The [[Republican Liberty Caucus]], which describes itself as "the oldest continuously operating organization in the Liberty Republican movement with state charters nationwide", was founded in 1991.<ref name="RLCHistory">[http://rlc.org/history-rlc History of the RLC], Republican Liberty Caucus (accessed August 19, 2016).</ref> The [[House Liberty Caucus]] is a [[congressional caucus]] formed by former Representative [[Justin Amash]], a former Republican of Michigan who is now a member of the [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian Party]].<ref name="Drape">Robert Draper, [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/magazine/has-the-libertarian-moment-finally-arrived.html Has the 'Libertarian Moment' Finally Arrived?], ''New York Times Magazine'' (August 7, 2016).</ref>
Prominent libertarian conservatives within the Republican Party include New Hampshire Governor [[Chris Sununu]],<ref name=Snopes>{{cite web|url=http://www.ontheissues.org/Chris_Sununu.htm|title=Chris Sununu on the Issues|website=www.ontheissues.org|access-date=2018-12-18}}</ref><ref name=RS>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/chris-sununu-new-hampshire-governor-trump-republican-party-1234602759/|title=The Republican Who's Thriving Despite Calling Trump 'F–king Crazy'|last=Voght|first=Kara|date=1 October 2022|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]|access-date=26 December 2023}}</ref> Senators [[Mike Lee]] and [[Rand Paul]], Representative [[Thomas Massie]], former Representative and Governor of South Carolina [[Mark Sanford]],<ref>Josh Goodman, [http://www.governing.com/blogs/politics/South-Carolinas-Libertarian-Governor.html South Carolina's "Libertarian" Governor] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160916162122/http://www.governing.com/blogs/politics/South-Carolinas-Libertarian-Governor.html |date=2016-09-16 }}, ''Governing'' (August 4, 2008).</ref> and former Representative [[Ron Paul]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/libertarians-go-local|title=Libertarians go local|date=August 12, 2018|website=Washington Examiner|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref> (who was a Republican prior to 1987 and again from 1996 to 2015, and a Libertarian from 1987 to 1996 and since 2015). Ron Paul ran for president [[Ron Paul 1988 presidential campaign|once as a Libertarian]] and [[Ron Paul 2012 presidential campaign|twice more recently as a Republican]].


Prominent libertarian conservatives within the Republican Party include New Hampshire Governor [[Chris Sununu]],<ref name="Snopes">{{cite web |title=Chris Sununu on the Issues |url=http://www.ontheissues.org/Chris_Sununu.htm |access-date=2018-12-18 |website=www.ontheissues.org}}</ref><ref name="RS">{{cite magazine |last=Voght |first=Kara |date=1 October 2022 |title=The Republican Who's Thriving Despite Calling Trump 'F–king Crazy' |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/chris-sununu-new-hampshire-governor-trump-republican-party-1234602759/ |access-date=26 December 2023 |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]}}</ref> Senators [[Mike Lee]] and [[Rand Paul]], Representative [[Thomas Massie]], former Representative and Governor of South Carolina [[Mark Sanford]],<ref>Josh Goodman, [http://www.governing.com/blogs/politics/South-Carolinas-Libertarian-Governor.html South Carolina's "Libertarian" Governor] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160916162122/http://www.governing.com/blogs/politics/South-Carolinas-Libertarian-Governor.html|date=2016-09-16}}, ''Governing'' (August 4, 2008).</ref> and former Representative [[Ron Paul]]<ref>{{cite web |date=August 12, 2018 |title=Libertarians go local |url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/libertarians-go-local |access-date=February 23, 2019 |website=Washington Examiner}}</ref> (who was a Republican prior to 1987 and again from 1996 to 2015, and a Libertarian from 1987 to 1996 and since 2015). Ron Paul ran for president [[Ron Paul 1988 presidential campaign|once as a Libertarian]] and [[Ron Paul 2012 presidential campaign|twice more recently as a Republican]].
The libertarian conservative wing of the party had significant cross-over with the [[Tea Party movement]].<ref name=libertarian>{{cite web |title=Is Half the Tea Party Libertarian? |first=Emily |last=Ekins |url=http://reason.com/poll/2011/09/26/is-half-the-tea-part-libertart |newspaper=[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]] |date=September 26, 2011 |access-date=May 3, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511064727/http://reason.com/poll/2011/09/26/is-half-the-tea-part-libertart |archive-date=May 11, 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=libertarian2>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party?mc_cid=6b9d637298&mc_eid=a1708a475b|title=Libertarian Roots of the Tea Party|last1=Kirby|first1=David|last2=Ekins|first2=Emily McClintock|publisher=Cato|date=August 6, 2012|access-date=May 3, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181204005725/https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party?mc_cid=6b9d637298&mc_eid=a1708a475b|archive-date=December 4, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>


The libertarian conservative wing of the party had significant cross-over with the [[Tea Party movement]].<ref name="libertarian">{{cite web |last=Ekins |first=Emily |date=September 26, 2011 |title=Is Half the Tea Party Libertarian? |url=http://reason.com/poll/2011/09/26/is-half-the-tea-part-libertart |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511064727/http://reason.com/poll/2011/09/26/is-half-the-tea-part-libertart |archive-date=May 11, 2012 |access-date=May 3, 2021 |newspaper=[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]}}</ref><ref name="libertarian2">{{Cite web |last1=Kirby |first1=David |last2=Ekins |first2=Emily McClintock |date=August 6, 2012 |title=Libertarian Roots of the Tea Party |url=http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party?mc_cid=6b9d637298&mc_eid=a1708a475b |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181204005725/https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party?mc_cid=6b9d637298&mc_eid=a1708a475b |archive-date=December 4, 2018 |access-date=May 3, 2021 |publisher=Cato}}</ref>
=== Neoconservatives ===

==== Neoconservatives ====
{{main|Neoconservatism}}
{{main|Neoconservatism}}
{{See also|American imperialism|Interventionism (politics)}}
{{See also|American imperialism|Interventionism (politics)}}


[[Neoconservatism|Neoconservatives]] promote an [[Interventionism (politics)|interventionist foreign policy]] to promote democracy or American interests abroad. Many neoconservatives were in earlier days identified as liberals or were affiliated with the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats]]. Neoconservatives have been credited with importing into the Republican Party a more active international policy. Neoconservatives are amenable to unilateral military action when they believe it serves a morally valid purpose (such as the spread of democracy).<ref name="Ehrman"/><ref name="Vaïsse"/> Many of its adherents became politically famous during the Republican presidential administrations of the late 20th century, and neoconservatism peaked in influence during the administration of [[George W. Bush]] and [[Dick Cheney]], when they played a major role in promoting and planning the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Wanting War: Why the Bush Administration Invaded Iraq|last=Record|first=Jeffery|publisher=Potomac Books, Inc.|pages=47–50}}</ref>
[[Neoconservatism|Neoconservatives]] promote an [[Interventionism (politics)|interventionist foreign policy]] to promote democracy or American interests abroad. Many neoconservatives were in earlier days identified as liberals or were affiliated with the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats]]. Neoconservatives have been credited with importing into the Republican Party a more active international policy. Neoconservatives are amenable to unilateral military action when they believe it serves a morally valid purpose (such as the spread of democracy).<ref name="Ehrman" /><ref name="Vaïsse" /> Many of its adherents became politically famous during the Republican presidential administrations of the late 20th century, and neoconservatism peaked in influence during the administration of [[George W. Bush]] and [[Dick Cheney]], when they played a major role in promoting and planning the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Record |first=Jeffery |title=Wanting War: Why the Bush Administration Invaded Iraq |publisher=Potomac Books, Inc. |pages=47–50}}</ref>


Prominent neoconservatives in the [[Bush-Cheney administration]] included [[John Bolton]], [[Paul Wolfowitz]], [[Elliott Abrams]], [[Richard Perle]], and [[Paul Bremer]]. During and after [[Trump presidency|Donald Trump's presidency]], neoconservatism has declined and [[non-interventionism]] and [[isolationism]] has grown among elected federal Republican officeholders.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Rucker |first1=Philip |author1-link=Philip Rucker |last2=Costa |first2=Robert |author2-link=Robert Costa (journalist) |date=March 21, 2016 |title=Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/21/donald-trump-reveals-foreign-policy-team-in-meeting-with-the-washington-post/}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dodson |first1=Kyle |last2=Brooks |first2=Clem |title=All by Himself? Trump, Isolationism, and the American Electorate |journal=The Sociological Quarterly |date=20 September 2021 |volume=63 |issue=4 |pages=780–803 |doi=10.1080/00380253.2021.1966348 |s2cid=240577549 |issn=0038-0253|doi-access=free }}</ref>
Prominent neoconservatives in the [[Bush-Cheney administration]] included [[John Bolton]], [[Paul Wolfowitz]], [[Elliott Abrams]], [[Richard Perle]], and [[Paul Bremer]]. During and after [[Trump presidency|Donald Trump's presidency]], neoconservatism has declined and [[non-interventionism]] and [[isolationism]] has grown among elected federal Republican officeholders.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Rucker |first1=Philip |author1-link=Philip Rucker |last2=Costa |first2=Robert |author2-link=Robert Costa (journalist) |date=March 21, 2016 |title=Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/21/donald-trump-reveals-foreign-policy-team-in-meeting-with-the-washington-post/ |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dodson |first1=Kyle |last2=Brooks |first2=Clem |date=20 September 2021 |title=All by Himself? Trump, Isolationism, and the American Electorate |journal=The Sociological Quarterly |volume=63 |issue=4 |pages=780–803 |doi=10.1080/00380253.2021.1966348 |issn=0038-0253 |s2cid=240577549 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


Republican members of the 118th Congress with neoconservative stances include Senators [[Tom Cotton]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vox.com/2014/11/5/7154855/tom-cotton-rand-paul|title=Meet Tom Cotton: Arkansas's next Senator and Rand Paul's worst nightmare|first=Zack|last=Beauchamp|date=November 5, 2014|website=Vox}}</ref> and [[Lindsey Graham]].<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/lindsey-graham-senate-trump-928948/|title=How Lindsey Graham Lost His Way|first1=Mark|last1=Binelli|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |date=January 6, 2020}}</ref>
Republican members of the 118th Congress with neoconservative stances include Senators [[Tom Cotton]]<ref>{{Cite web |last=Beauchamp |first=Zack |date=November 5, 2014 |title=Meet Tom Cotton: Arkansas's next Senator and Rand Paul's worst nightmare |url=https://www.vox.com/2014/11/5/7154855/tom-cotton-rand-paul |website=Vox}}</ref> and [[Lindsey Graham]].<ref>{{Cite magazine |last1=Binelli |first1=Mark |date=January 6, 2020 |title=How Lindsey Graham Lost His Way |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/lindsey-graham-senate-trump-928948/ |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]}}</ref>


=== Moderates ===
==== Trumpists ====
{{main|Trumpism}}
<!-- "Moderate Republican" and "Moderate Republicans" redirect here. See MOSHIDDENLINKADVICE if you change the header.-->
{{see also|Center-right politics|Republican Governance Group|Moderate conservatism|Problem Solvers Caucus}}
{{see also|Right-wing populism|Radical right (United States)|National conservatism|List of politicians associated with Trumpism}}
Sometimes referred to as the MAGA or "America First" movement,<ref name="University of Washington 2021">{{cite web | title=Panel Study of the MAGA Movement | website=University of Washington | date=January 6, 2021 | url=https://sites.uw.edu/magastudy/ | access-date=March 24, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Gabbatt Smith 2023">{{cite web | last=Gabbatt | first=Adam | last2=Smith | first2=David | title='America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump | website=the Guardian | date=August 19, 2023 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/19/vivek-ramaswamy-republican-presidential-nomination-candidate | access-date=March 24, 2024}}</ref> Trumpists are the dominant faction in the Republican Party as of 2024.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ball |first1=Molly |title=The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism |url=https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/gop-new-hampshire-trump-haley-403080ca |access-date=February 22, 2024 |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=January 23, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240124014202/https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/gop-new-hampshire-trump-haley-403080ca |archive-date=January 24, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Biebricher-2023">{{Cite journal |last1=Biebricher |first1=Thomas |date=October 25, 2023 |title=The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective |journal=Politische Vierteljahresschrift |language=en |doi=10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2 |issn=2075-4698 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Arhin-2023">{{Cite journal |last1=Arhin |first1=Kofi |last2=Stockemer |first2=Daniel |last3=Normandin |first3=Marie-Soleil |date=May 29, 2023 |title=THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other? |journal=[[World Affairs]] |language=en |volume=186 |issue=3 |doi=10.1177/0043820023117681 |issn=1940-1582 |doi-access=free |quote= In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP).}}</ref><ref name="Punchbowl Old GOP">{{Cite news |last1=Desiderio |first1=Andrew |last2=Sherman |first2=Jake |last3=Bresnahan |first3=John |date=February 7, 2024 |title=The end of the Old GOP |language=en-US |work=[[Punchbowl News]] |url=https://punchbowl.news/article/the-end-of-the-old-republican-party-senate-conference/ |access-date=February 8, 2024 |archive-date=February 7, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240207114758/https://punchbowl.news/article/the-end-of-the-old-republican-party-senate-conference/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Aratani2021">{{cite news |last1=Aratani |first1=Lauren |title=Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/26/republicans-minimum-wage-bills-senate |access-date=7 September 2021 |work=The Guardian |date=26 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814230535/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/26/republicans-minimum-wage-bills-senate |archive-date=14 August 2021 |quote=In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.}}</ref> It has been described as consisting of a range of right-wing ideologies including but not limited to [[right-wing populism]],<ref name="campani">{{Cite journal |last1=Campani |first1=Giovanna |last2=Fabelo Concepción |first2=Sunamis |last3=Rodriguez Soler |first3=Angel |last4=Sánchez Savín |first4=Claudia |date=December 2022 |title=The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse |journal=Societies |language=en |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=154 |doi=10.3390/soc12060154 |issn=2075-4698 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Norris |first=Pippa |date=November 2020 |title=Measuring populism worldwide |journal=Party Politics |language=en |volume=26 |issue=6 |pages=697–717 |doi=10.1177/1354068820927686 |s2cid=216298689 |issn=1354-0688|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Cassidy">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/donald-trump-is-transforming-the-g-o-p-into-a-populist-nativist-party|title=Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party|last=Cassidy|first=John|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|date=February 29, 2016|access-date=July 22, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304225035/http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/donald-trump-is-transforming-the-g-o-p-into-a-populist-nativist-party|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> [[national conservatism]],<ref name="Economist Feb152024">{{cite news |date=February 15, 2024 |title="National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism |url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/02/15/national-conservatives-are-forging-a-global-front-against-liberalism |url-status=live |work=[[The Economist]] |location=[[London]] |publisher=The Economist Group |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240220205122/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/02/15/national-conservatives-are-forging-a-global-front-against-liberalism |archive-date=February 20, 2024 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> [[neo-nationalism]],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zhou |first1=Shaoqing |title=The origins, characteristics and trends of neo-nationalism in the 21st century |journal=International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology |volume=6 |issue=1 |date=December 8, 2022 |doi=10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4 |url=https://ijae.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4#citeas |access-date=February 23, 2024 |archive-date=February 23, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240223032432/https://ijae.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4 |url-status=live |doi-access=free |quote=On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism.|pmc=9735003 }}</ref> and [[Trumpism]], the political movement associated with [[Donald Trump]] and his base.<ref name="Katzenstein2019">{{cite news |last1=Katzenstein |first1=Peter J. |author-link=Peter J. Katzenstein |title=Trumpism is US |url=https://www.wzb.eu/en/news/trumpism-is-us |access-date=11 September 2021 |work=WZB {{!}} Berlin Social Science Center |date=20 March 2019}}</ref><ref name="DiSalvo2022">{{cite magazine |last1=DiSalvo |first1=Daniel |author-link=Daniel DiSalvo |date=Fall 2022 |title=Party Factions and American Politics |url=https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/party-factions-and-american-politics |journal=National Affairs |access-date=April 11, 2023 |archive-date=March 23, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230323210441/https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/party-factions-and-american-politics |url-status=live }}</ref> They have been described by some commentators, including Joseph Lowndes, James A. Gardner, and Guy-Uriel Charles, as the American political variant of the [[Radical right (United States)|far-right]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lowndes |first1=Joseph |editor-last=de la Torre |editor-first=Carlos |title=Routledge Handbook of Global Populism |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gm5uDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT270 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |chapter=Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump |isbn=978-1315226446 |year=2019 |location=London & New York |at="Trumpism" section, pp. 197–200 |quote=Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Bennhold |first1=Katrin |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/07/world/europe/germany-trump-far-right.html |title=Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right |date=September 7, 2020 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120233123/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/07/world/europe/germany-trump-far-right.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Gardner Charles 2023 p. 31">{{cite book | last1=Gardner | first1=J.A. | last2=Charles | first2=G.U. | title=Election Law in the American Political System | publisher=Aspen Publishing | series=Aspen Casebook Series | year=2023 | isbn=978-1-5438-2683-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZViqEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 | access-date=2023-12-31 | page=31}}</ref>
Moderate Republicans tend to be conservative-to-moderate on fiscal issues and moderate-to-liberal on social issues, and usually represent [[swing state]]s or [[Red states and blue states|blue states]]. Moderate Republican voters are typically [[Educational attainment in the United States|highly educated]], affluent, socially moderate or liberal and often [[Never Trump movement|Never Trump]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cohn |first=Nate |date=August 17, 2023 |title=The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |access-date=October 9, 2023 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=October 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231012095530/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Ideologically, such Republicans resemble the [[conservative liberalism|conservative liberals]] of Europe.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Europe_A_Political_Profile_2_volumes/tkPPEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22if+transplanted+to+the+united+states,+they+would+occupy%22&pg=PA107&printsec=frontcover|title=Europe: A Political Profile|last=Slomp|first=Hans|volume=1|year=2011|page=107|publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]]|quote=Most European liberals are Conservative Liberals, located at the right end of the left-right line, exactly opposite the American liberals' position. If transplanted to the United States, they would occupy the Left wing and the center of the Republican Party. Only the less numerous social liberals resemble American liberals.}}</ref>


Despite producing no manifesto,<ref name="SpiegeleireSkinnerSweijs2017">{{cite book |last1=Spiegeleire |first1=Stephan De |last2=Skinner |first2=Clarissa |last3=Sweijs |first3=Tim |title=The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From, and What It Means for International Security and Defense |year=2017 |publisher=The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies |isbn=978-94-92102-59-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aY19DwAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PR6}}</ref> the Trumpist faction supports cuts to spending.<ref name="Chatelain 2023 d086">{{cite web | last=Chatelain | first=Ryan | title=Freedom Caucus issues demands for raising debt limit | website=Spectrum News NY1 | date=2023-03-10 | url=https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/03/10/freedom-caucus-issues-demands-for-raising-debt-limit | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Feagin |first=Joe R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tPGyEAAAQBAJ |title=White Minority Nation: Past, Present and Future |date=2023-04-25 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-86223-2 |language=en}}</ref> In international relations, Trumpists support U.S. aid to Israel but not to Ukraine,<ref name="Falk 2023 t804">{{cite web | last=Falk | first=Thomas O | title=Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine? | website=Al Jazeera | date=2023-11-08 | url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/8/why-are-us-republicans-pushing-for-aid-to-israel-but-not-ukraine | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Riccardi |first=Nicholas |date=February 19, 2024 |title=Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4492514-gop-strained-by-trump-influenced-shift-from-reagan-on-russia/ |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[Associated Press]]}}</ref> are generally supportive towards [[Russia]],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lillis |first=Mike |date=February 28, 2024 |title=GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4492514-gop-strained-by-trump-influenced-shift-from-reagan-on-russia/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240228121816/https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4492514-gop-strained-by-trump-influenced-shift-from-reagan-on-russia/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 28, 2024 |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|quote=Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ball |first=Molly |date=February 23, 2024 |title=How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine |url=https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/how-trump-turned-conservatives-against-helping-ukraine-d9f75b3b |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Jonathan |first=Chait |date=February 23, 2024 |title=Russian Dolls Trump has finally remade Republicans into Putin's playthings. |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-republicans-vladimir-putin-puppets.html |access-date=February 28, 2024 |work=[[New York (magazine)|Intelligencer]]|quote=But during his time in office and after, Trump managed to create, from the grassroots up, a Republican constituency for Russia-friendly policy ... Conservatives vying to be the Trumpiest of them all have realized that supporting Russia translates in the Republican mind as a proxy for supporting Trump. Hence the politicians most willing to defend his offenses against democratic norms — Marjorie Taylor Greene, Jim Jordan, Tommy Tuberville, Mike Lee, J. D. Vance — hold the most anti-Ukraine or pro-Russia views. Conversely, the least-Trumpy Republicans, such as Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney, have the most hawkish views on Russia. The rapid growth of Trump's once-unique pro-Russia stance is a gravitational function of his personality cult.}}</ref> and favor an [[isolationism|isolationist]] "[[America First (policy)|America First]]" foreign policy agenda.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lange |first=Jason |date=January 17, 2024 |title=Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-rise-sparks-isolationist-worries-among-us-allies-americans-focus-home-2024-01-17/ |access-date=January 17, 2024 |website=[[Reuters]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/09/us/politics/trump-2025-nato.html |work=New York Times |date=December 9, 2023|access-date=December 10, 2023|last1=Swan|first1=Jonathan|last2=Savage|first2=Charlie|last3=Haberman|first3=Maggie}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Baker|first=Peter|title=Favoring Foes Over Friends, Trump Threatens to Upend International Order|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/11/us/politics/trump-nato.html|work=The New York Times |date=February 11, 2024|access-date=February 21, 2024|issn=1553-8095|language=en|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref name="Cohn2023">{{Cite news |last=Cohn |first=Nate |date=August 17, 2023 |title=The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |access-date=October 9, 2023 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=October 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231012095530/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/17/upshot/six-kinds-of-republican-voters.html |url-status=live }}</ref> They generally reject compromise within the party and with the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats]],<ref name="Collinson 2023 n804">{{cite web | last=Collinson | first=Stephen | title=McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution | website=CNN | date=2023-10-04 | url=https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/04/politics/mccarthy-victim-trump-gop-revolution/index.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref name="Rocha 2023 k444">{{cite web | last=Rocha | first=Alander | title=Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them' | website=AL | date=2023-09-07 | url=https://www.al.com/news/2023/09/mike-rogers-says-far-right-wing-of-gop-act-like-my-kids-you-cant-get-rid-of-them.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref> and are willing to oust fellow Republican office holders they deem to be too moderate.<ref name="Macpherson 2021 r371">{{cite web | last=Macpherson | first=James | title=Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party | website=AP News | date=2021-07-24 | url=https://apnews.com/article/government-and-politics-north-dakota-8fce64375abe042324cf26b4c82d57bf | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref><ref name="Times-Herald.com 2023 x358">{{cite web | title=Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future | website=The Times Herald | date=2023-05-15 | url=https://www.times-herald.com/opinion/fringe-activists-threaten-georgia-gop-s-political-future/article_b3fd5a4a-f33f-11ed-901d-7fbbbf28e09e.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref> Compared to other Republicans, the Trumpist faction is more likely to be immigration restrictionists,<ref name="auto3">{{cite book |last1=Baker |first1=Paula |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=547UDwAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Handbook of American Political History |last2=Critchlow |first2=Donald T. |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2020 |isbn=978-0190628697 |page=387 |quote="Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base." |via=Google Books |access-date=April 23, 2021 |archive-date=December 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231215023724/https://books.google.com/books?id=547UDwAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> and to be against [[free trade]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Kent |title=Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2021 |isbn=978-0190086350 |chapter=Populism, Trade, and Trump's Path to Victory}}</ref> [[neoconservatism]],<ref>{{Cite magazine |last1=Smith |first1=Jordan Michael |last2=Logis |first2=Rich |last3=Logis |first3=Rich |last4=Shephard |first4=Alex |last5=Shephard |first5=Alex |last6=Kipnis |first6=Laura |last7=Kipnis |first7=Laura |last8=Haas |first8=Lidija |last9=Haas |first9=Lidija |date=October 17, 2022 |title=The Neocons Are Losing. Why Aren't We Happy? |magazine=The New Republic |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/168045/neoconservative-isolationism-republican-party |access-date=May 5, 2023 |issn=0028-6583 |archive-date=May 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230505163722/https://newrepublic.com/article/168045/neoconservative-isolationism-republican-party |url-status=live }}</ref> and [[Environmentalism|environmental protection laws]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Arias-Maldonado |first=Manuel |date=January 2020 |title=Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism |journal=Sustainability |language=en |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=2538 |doi=10.3390/su12062538 |issn=2071-1050 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
While they sometimes share the economic views of other Republicans (i.e. [[tax cuts|lower taxes]], [[deregulation]], and [[welfare reform]]), moderate Republicans differ in that some are for [[affirmative action in the United States|affirmative action]],<ref name="washpost" /> [[LGBT rights in the United States|LGBT rights and same-sex marriage]], legal access to and even public funding for [[abortion debate|abortion]], [[Gun politics in the United States|gun control]] laws, more [[environmental regulation]] and action on [[climate change]], fewer restrictions on [[immigration]] and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and [[stem cell controversy|embryonic stem cell research]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/06/liberal.republicans/|title=Analysis: An autopsy of liberal Republicans |first=Alan |last=Silverleib|website=cnn.com|language=en|access-date=October 14, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/19/us/several-gop-senators-back-money-for-stem-cell-research.html|title=Several G.O.P. Senators Back Money for Stem Cell Research|last=Pear|first=Robert|work=The New York Times |date=June 19, 2001 |access-date=October 14, 2018|language=en}}</ref> In the 21st century, some former Republican moderates have switched to the Democratic Party.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Tatum |first1=Sophie |title=3 Kansas legislators switch from Republican to Democrat |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/19/politics/kansas-legislature-republican-democrat/index.html |website=CNN |date=December 20, 2018 |access-date=January 8, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Weiner |first1=Rachel |title=Charlie Crist defends party switch |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2012/12/10/charlie-crist-defends-party-switch/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=January 8, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Hornick |first1=Ed |last2=Walsh |first2=Deidre |title=Longtime GOP Sen. Arlen Specter becomes Democrat |url=https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/28/specter.party.switch/ |website=CNN |access-date=January 8, 2021}}</ref>


The Republican Party's populist and far-right movements emerged in occurrence with a global increase in populist movements in the 2010s and 2020s,<ref name = "Isaac2017">{{cite journal |last1=Isaac |first1=Jeffrey |title=Making America Great Again? |journal=Perspectives on Politics |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=15 |issue=3 |date=November 2017 |pages=625–631 |doi=10.1017/S1537592717000871 |doi-access=free }}</ref> coupled with entrenchment and increased partisanship within the party since 2010, fueled by the rise of the [[Tea Party movement]] which has also been described as far-right.<ref name="Blum pp. 88–109">{{cite journal | last=Blum | first=Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike | title=How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era | journal=British Journal of Political Science | date=2024 | publisher=Cambridge University Press | volume=54 | issue=1 | pages=88–109 | doi=10.1017/S0007123423000224 | url=https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i1p88-109_5.html | access-date=2023-12-31}}</ref> The election of Trump in 2016 split the party into pro-Trump and [[Never Trump movement|anti-Trump]] factions.<ref name ="Johnson-McCray-Ragusa 2018">{{Cite journal|last1=Johnson|first1=Lauren R.|last2=McCray|first2=Deon|last3=Ragusa|first3=Jordan M.|date=January 11, 2018|title=#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election|journal=Research & Politics|language=en|volume=5|issue=1|doi=10.1177/2053168017749383|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Swartz2022">{{Cite journal |last1=Swartz |first1=David L. |date=27 May 2022 |title=Trump divide among American conservative professors |journal=[[Theory & Society]] |language=en |volume=52 |issue=5 |pages=739–769 |doi=10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4 |issn=1573-7853 |doi-access=free |pmc=10224651 }}</ref>
Prominent 21st century moderate Republicans include Senators [[Lisa Murkowski]] of Alaska and [[Susan Collins]] of Maine<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/collins-murkowski-key-votes-kavanaugh-confirmation/572407/|title=Two Moderate Senators, Two Very Different Paths|first=Elaina|last=Plott|date=October 6, 2018|website=The Atlantic|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/opinion/collins-murkowski-change-parties.html|title=Opinion - Senators Collins and Murkowski, It's Time to Leave the G.O.P.|first=Susan|last=Faludi|work=The New York Times |date=July 5, 2018|access-date=February 23, 2019|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408193-kavanaughs-fate-rests-with-sen-collins/|title=Kavanaugh's fate rests with Sen. Collins|first=Linda|last=Petre|date=September 25, 2018|website=TheHill|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/sen-lisa-murkowski-face-reprisal-alaska-gop|title=Sen. Lisa Murkowski Could Face Reprisal from Alaska GOP|first1=Griffin|last1=Connolly|date=October 9, 2018|access-date=February 23, 2019|website=rollcall.com|archive-date=October 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181011013657/https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/sen-lisa-murkowski-face-reprisal-alaska-gop|url-status=dead}}</ref> and several current or former governors of northeastern states, such as [[Charlie Baker]] of Massachusetts<ref>{{cite web|url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-a-massachusetts-republican-became-one-of-americas-most-popular-politicians/|title=How A Massachusetts Republican Became One Of America's Most Popular Politicians|first=Perry |last=Bacon|date=March 30, 2018|website=fivethirtyeight.com|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref> and [[Phil Scott]] of Vermont.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/11/18/metro/if-moderate-republicans-dont-want-go-washington-how-will-things-ever-change/|title=If moderate Republicans don't want to go to Washington, how will things ever change?|website=BostonGlobe.com|date=November 18, 2021}}</ref> Another moderate Republican is incumbent governor of Nevada [[Joe Lombardo]], who was previously the [[Sheriff of Clark County]].<ref>{{Cite web|website=NBC News|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/nevada-gop-governor-signs-new-abortion-protections-law-rcna87022|title=Nevada governor signs new abortion protections into law|date=March 31, 2023}}</ref> Moderate Republican Representatives include [[Brian Fitzpatrick (American politician)|Brian Fitzpatrick]], [[Don Bacon]], and ex-Representative [[John Katko]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=These Are the Most Bipartisan Politicians - No Labels |url=https://www.nolabels.org/these-are-the-most-bipartisan-politicians |access-date=2024-04-07 |website=www.nolabels.org |language=en}}</ref>


When conservative columnist [[George Will]] advised voters of all ideologies to vote for Democratic candidates in the Senate and House elections of November 2018,<ref name="Will2018">{{cite news |last1=Will |first1=George |title=Opinion {{!}} Vote against the GOP this November |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html? |newspaper=Washington Post |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916042046/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html |archive-date=16 September 2018 |date=June 22, 2018}}</ref> political writer Dan McLaughlin at the ''National Review'' responded that doing so would make the Trumpist faction even more powerful within the Republican party.<ref name="McLaughlin">{{cite web |last1=McLaughlin |first1=Dan |title=Don't Throw the Republicans Out: A Response to George Will |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/george-will-endorses-democrats-terrible-idea/ |website=National Review |access-date=5 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180625221045/https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/george-will-endorses-democrats-terrible-idea/ |archive-date=25 June 2018 |date=25 June 2018}}</ref> Anticipating Trump's likely defeat in the U.S. presidential election held on November 3, 2020, [[Peter Feaver]] wrote in ''[[Foreign Policy]]'' magazine: "With victory having been so close, the Trumpist faction in the party will be empowered and in no mood to compromise or reform."<ref name="Feaver2020">{{cite journal |last1=Feaver |first1=Peter |title=What Trump's Near-Victory Means for Republican Foreign Policy |journal=Foreign Policy |date=November 5, 2020 |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/05/trump-election-republican-foreign-policy/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105195928/https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/05/trump-election-republican-foreign-policy/ |archive-date=November 5, 2020 |access-date=6 November 2022}}</ref> A poll conducted in February 2021 indicated that a plurality of Republicans (46% versus 27%) would leave the Republican Party to join a new party if Trump chose to create it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/02/21/exclusive-trump-party-he-still-holds-loyalty-gop-voters/6765406002|title=Exclusive: Defeated and impeached, Trump still commands the loyalty of the GOP's voters|first=Susan Page and Sarah|last=Elbeshbishi|website=USA TODAY}}</ref> Nick Beauchamp, assistant professor of political science at [[Northeastern University]], says he sees the country as divided into four parties, with two factions representing each of the Democratic and Republican parties: "For the GOP, there's the Trump faction—which is the larger group—and the non-Trump faction".<ref name="Stening2022">{{cite news |last1=Stening |first1=Tanner |title=Do political endorsements still matter? |url=https://news.northeastern.edu/2022/05/26/do-political-endorsements-matter/ |access-date=5 November 2022 |work=News @ Northeastern |date=26 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220527142633/https://news.northeastern.edu/2022/05/26/do-political-endorsements-matter/ |archive-date=27 May 2022}}</ref>
One of the most high-ranking moderate Republicans in recent history was [[Colin Powell]] as Secretary of State in the first term of the [[George W. Bush]] administration (Powell left the Republican Party in January 2021 following the [[2021 storming of the United States Capitol]], and had endorsed every Democrat for president in the general election since 2008).<ref name="nolongerconsider">{{cite news |last1=Pitofsky |first1=Marina |title=Colin Powell: 'I can no longer call myself a fellow Republican' |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/533575-colin-powell-i-can-no-longer-call-myself-a-fellow-republican/ |access-date=January 11, 2021 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |date=January 10, 2021}}</ref>


Lilliana Mason, associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, states that Donald Trump solidified the trend among Southern white conservative Democrats since the 1960s of leaving the Democratic Party and joining the Republican Party: "Trump basically worked as a lightning rod to finalize that process of creating the Republican Party as a single entity for defending the high status of white, Christian, rural Americans. It's not a huge percentage of Americans that holds these beliefs, and it's not even the entire Republican Party; it's just about half of it. But the party itself is controlled by this intolerant, very strongly pro-Trump faction."<ref name="Homans2022">{{cite news |last1=Homans |first1=Charles |title=Where Does American Democracy Go From Here? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/03/17/magazine/democracy.html |access-date=5 November 2022 |work=The New York Times |date=17 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220317090219/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/03/17/magazine/democracy.html |archive-date=17 March 2022}}</ref>
The [[Republican Governance Group]] is a caucus of moderate Republicans within the House of Representatives.<ref name="auto"/>

Rachel Kleinfeld, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, describes it as an authoritarian, antidemocratic movement that has successfully weaponized cultural issues, and that cultivates a narrative placing white people, Christians, and men at the top of a status hierarchy as its response to the so-called "[[Great Replacement in the United States|Great Replacement]]" theory, a claim that minorities, immigrants, and women, enabled by Democrats, Jews, and elites, are displacing white people, Christians, and men from their rightful positions in American society.<ref name="Kleinfeld2022">{{cite web |last1=Kleinfeld |first1=Rachel |title=Five Strategies to Support U.S. Democracy |url=https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/09/15/five-strategies-to-support-u.s.-democracy-pub-87918 |website=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220915223727/https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/09/15/five-strategies-to-support-u.s.-democracy-pub-87918 |archive-date=15 September 2022 |date=September 15, 2022}}</ref>

In 2022, a faction emerged of Trump loyalists within the [[Freedom Caucus]] known as the '[[MAGA]] Squad', including [[Paul Gosar]], [[Marjorie Greene]], [[Matt Gaetz]], [[Madison Cawthorn]], [[Louie Gohmert]], [[Mary Miller (politician)|Mary Miller]], [[Mo Brooks]], [[Andy Biggs]], [[Scott Perry (politician)|Scott Perry]] and [[Lauren Boebert]]. While "not a formal caucus", it was described as more radical than the mainstream Freedom Caucus,<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://time.com/6186037/matt-gaetz-marjorie-taylor-greene-maga-house-republicans/ |title=How the 'MAGA Squad' Is Building Power to Control the Next Congress |date=June 14, 2022 |magazine=Time |first=Molly |last=Ball |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/greene-boebert-gosar-gaetz/2021/11/20/c77dc78a-47dd-11ec-973c-be864f938c72_story.html |title=A MAGA squad of Trump loyalists sees its influence grow amid demands for political purity among Republicans |date=November 21, 2021 |newspaper=The Washington Post |first1=Jacqueline |last1=Alemany |first2=Marianna |last2=Sotomayor |first3=Josh |last3=Dawsey |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-loyalist-boeberts-reelection-bid-recount-93075542 |title=Trump loyalist Boebert's reelection bid could go to recount |date=November 11, 2022 |work=ABC News |first=Jesse |last=Bedayn |agency=The Associated Press / [[Report for America]] |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref> and supportive of primary challenges against incumbent Republicans during the [[2022 United States House of Representatives elections]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-maga-squad/2021/12/26/654f49ea-5448-11ec-8769-2f4ecdf7a2ad_story.html |title=House MAGA squad seeks to expand by boosting challengers to fellow Republicans |date=December 26, 2021 |newspaper=The Washington Post |first=Colby |last=Itkowitz |access-date=November 15, 2022 }}</ref><ref name="Edmondson2022">{{cite news |last1=Edmondson |first1=Catie |title=In Illinois, MAGA Congresswoman Rallies to Oust Her G.O.P. Colleague |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/28/us/politics/mary-miller-rodney-davis-il.html |work=The New York Times |date=28 June 2022}}</ref>

In a speech he gave on November 2, 2022, at Washington's Union Station near the U.S. Capitol, President Biden asserted that "the pro-Trump faction" of the Republican Party is trying to undermine the U.S. electoral system and suppress voting rights.<ref name="HeldermanAbutaleb2022">{{cite news |last1=Helderman |first1=Rosalind S. |last2=Abutaleb |first2=Yasmeen |title=Biden warns GOP could set nation on 'path to chaos' as democratic system faces strain |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/02/biden-warning-democracy-midterms-election-gop/ |access-date=5 November 2022|newspaper=Washington Post|date=November 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221103003303/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/02/biden-warning-democracy-midterms-election-gop/ |archive-date=3 November 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER|website=Wiley Online Library|access-date=February 18, 2024|date=May 29, 2023|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1177/00438200231176818}}</ref>


===Anti-Trump faction===
==== Anti-Trump faction ====
{{Main|Never Trump movement}}
{{Main|Never Trump movement}}
A divide has formed in the party between those who remain loyal to Donald Trump and those who oppose him.<ref name="Lauter2021">{{cite news |last1=Lauter |first1=David |title=Loyalty to Trump remains the fault line for Republicans |url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-02-14/loyalty-to-trump-remains-the-fault-line-for-republicans |access-date=8 September 2021 |work=Los Angeles Times |date=14 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210215234008/https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-02-14/loyalty-to-trump-remains-the-fault-line-for-republicans |archive-date=15 February 2021}}</ref> A recent survey concluded that the Republican Party was divided between pro-Trump (the "Trump Boosters," "Die-hard Trumpers," and "[[Infowars]] G.O.P." wings) and anti-Trump factions (the "[[Never Trump movement|Never Trump]]" and "Post-Trump G.O.P." wings).<ref name="Haberman2021"/> Senator [[John McCain]] was an early leading critic of Trumpism within the Republican Party, refusing to support the then-Republican presidential nominee in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 presidential election]].<ref name="ml2016">Dumcius, Gintautas. [http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/03/sen_john_mccain_weighs_in_on_d.html "Sen. John McCain backs up Mitt Romney, says Donald Trump's comments 'uninformed and indeed dangerous'"], ''[[The Republican (Springfield, Massachusetts)|The Republican]]'' (March 3, 2016). Retrieved January 27, 2022.</ref>
A divide has formed in the party between those who remain loyal to Donald Trump and those who oppose him.<ref name="Lauter2021">{{cite news |last1=Lauter |first1=David |date=14 February 2021 |title=Loyalty to Trump remains the fault line for Republicans |url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-02-14/loyalty-to-trump-remains-the-fault-line-for-republicans |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210215234008/https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-02-14/loyalty-to-trump-remains-the-fault-line-for-republicans |archive-date=15 February 2021 |access-date=8 September 2021 |work=Los Angeles Times}}</ref> A recent survey concluded that the Republican Party was divided between pro-Trump (the "Trump Boosters," "Die-hard Trumpers," and "[[Infowars]] G.O.P." wings) and anti-Trump factions (the "[[Never Trump movement|Never Trump]]" and "Post-Trump G.O.P." wings).<ref name="Haberman2021" /> Senator [[John McCain]] was an early leading critic of Trumpism within the Republican Party, refusing to support the then-Republican presidential nominee in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 presidential election]].<ref name="ml2016">Dumcius, Gintautas. [http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/03/sen_john_mccain_weighs_in_on_d.html "Sen. John McCain backs up Mitt Romney, says Donald Trump's comments 'uninformed and indeed dangerous'"], ''[[The Republican (Springfield, Massachusetts)|The Republican]]'' (March 3, 2016). Retrieved January 27, 2022.</ref>


Several critics of the Trump faction have faced various forms of retaliation. Representative [[Liz Cheney]] was removed from her position as Republican conference chair in the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]], which was perceived as retaliation for her criticism of Trump;<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-vote-to-oust-rep-liz-cheney-from-leadership-2021-5|title=Republicans oust Rep. Liz Cheney from leadership over her opposition to Trump and GOP election lies|website=Business Insider|date=May 12, 2021}}</ref> in 2022, she was defeated by a pro-Trump primary challenger.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Enten |first=Harry |date=August 24, 2022 |title=Analysis: Cheney's loss may be the second worst for a House incumbent in 60 years |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/17/politics/liz-cheney-worst-defeat-house-incumbent/index.html |access-date=August 24, 2022 |website=[[CNN]]}}</ref> Representative [[Adam Kinzinger]] decided to retire at the end of his term, while Murkowski faced a pro-Trump primary challenger in [[2022 United States Senate election in Alaska|2022]] against [[Kelly Tshibaka]] whom she defeated.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/540547-kinzinger-gets-pro-trump-primary-challenger/|title=Kinzinger gets pro-Trump primary challenger|website=The Hill|date=February 25, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-endorses-murkowski-primary-opponent-kelly-tshibaka|title=Trump endorses Murkowski primary opponent Kelly Tshibaka|website=Fox News|date=June 18, 2021}}</ref> A primary challenge to Romney had been suggested<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jason-chaffetz-mitt-romney-utah-senate-primary-challenge|title=Jason Chaffetz says he's open to challenging Mitt Romney in Utah Senate primary|website = Washington Examiner|date=February 16, 2021}}</ref> by [[Jason Chaffetz]], who has criticized his opponents within the Republican Party as "Trump haters".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thewashingtontime.com/jason-chaffetz-dear-republican-trump-haters-what-did-you-get-for-your-trade/|title=Dear Republican Trump haters – What did you get for your trade?|website=Washington Times|date=August 16, 2021}}</ref> Representative [[Anthony Gonzalez (politician)|Anthony Gonzalez]], one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump over the [[2021 United States Capitol attack|Capitol riot]], called him "a cancer" while announcing his retirement.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/16/us/politics/anthony-gonzalez-ohio-trump.html|title=Ohio House Republican, Calling Trump 'a Cancer,' Bows Out of 2022|first=Jonathan|last=Martin|newspaper=The New York Times |date=September 17, 2021}}</ref> Former Governor of New Jersey [[Chris Christie]], who was [[Chris Christie 2024 presidential campaign|running against Trump]] in the [[2024 Republican Party presidential primaries|2024 Republican primaries]], called him "a lonely, self-consumed, self-serving, mirror hog" in [[Chris Christie 2024 presidential campaign|his presidential announcement]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/former-new-jersey-gov-chris-christie-set-launch-99859937|title=Christie goes after Trump in presidential campaign launch, calling him a 'self-serving mirror hog'|first1=Jill|last1=Colvin|first2=Holly|last2=Ramer|newspaper=ABC News |date=June 6, 2023}}</ref> Indiana senator [[Todd Young]] is one of few elected Republican senators that has pledged to not support Trump's 2024 campaign.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Miller |first=Andrew |date=2024-03-08 |title=Indiana GOP Sen. Todd Young renews his pledge not to support Trump in 2024 |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/indiana-gop-sen-todd-young-renews-his-pledge-not-to-support-trump-in-2024 |access-date=2024-03-09 |website=Fox News |language=en-US}}</ref>
Several critics of the Trump faction have faced various forms of retaliation. Representative [[Liz Cheney]] was removed from her position as Republican conference chair in the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]], which was perceived as retaliation for her criticism of Trump;<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 12, 2021 |title=Republicans oust Rep. Liz Cheney from leadership over her opposition to Trump and GOP election lies |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-vote-to-oust-rep-liz-cheney-from-leadership-2021-5 |website=Business Insider}}</ref> in 2022, she was defeated by a pro-Trump primary challenger.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Enten |first=Harry |date=August 24, 2022 |title=Analysis: Cheney's loss may be the second worst for a House incumbent in 60 years |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/17/politics/liz-cheney-worst-defeat-house-incumbent/index.html |access-date=August 24, 2022 |website=[[CNN]]}}</ref> Representative [[Adam Kinzinger]] decided to retire at the end of his term, while Murkowski faced a pro-Trump primary challenger in [[2022 United States Senate election in Alaska|2022]] against [[Kelly Tshibaka]] whom she defeated.<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 25, 2021 |title=Kinzinger gets pro-Trump primary challenger |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/540547-kinzinger-gets-pro-trump-primary-challenger/ |website=The Hill}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=June 18, 2021 |title=Trump endorses Murkowski primary opponent Kelly Tshibaka |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-endorses-murkowski-primary-opponent-kelly-tshibaka |website=Fox News}}</ref> A primary challenge to Romney had been suggested<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 16, 2021 |title=Jason Chaffetz says he's open to challenging Mitt Romney in Utah Senate primary |url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jason-chaffetz-mitt-romney-utah-senate-primary-challenge |website=Washington Examiner}}</ref> by [[Jason Chaffetz]], who has criticized his opponents within the Republican Party as "Trump haters".<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 16, 2021 |title=Dear Republican Trump haters – What did you get for your trade? |url=https://www.thewashingtontime.com/jason-chaffetz-dear-republican-trump-haters-what-did-you-get-for-your-trade/ |website=Washington Times}}</ref> Representative [[Anthony Gonzalez (politician)|Anthony Gonzalez]], one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump over the [[2021 United States Capitol attack|Capitol riot]], called him "a cancer" while announcing his retirement.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Martin |first=Jonathan |date=September 17, 2021 |title=Ohio House Republican, Calling Trump 'a Cancer,' Bows Out of 2022 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/16/us/politics/anthony-gonzalez-ohio-trump.html |newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref> Former Governor of New Jersey [[Chris Christie]], who was [[Chris Christie 2024 presidential campaign|running against Trump]] in the [[2024 Republican Party presidential primaries|2024 Republican primaries]], called him "a lonely, self-consumed, self-serving, mirror hog" in [[Chris Christie 2024 presidential campaign|his presidential announcement]].<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Colvin |first1=Jill |last2=Ramer |first2=Holly |date=June 6, 2023 |title=Christie goes after Trump in presidential campaign launch, calling him a 'self-serving mirror hog' |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/former-new-jersey-gov-chris-christie-set-launch-99859937 |newspaper=ABC News}}</ref> Indiana senator [[Todd Young]] is one of few elected Republican senators that has pledged to not support Trump's 2024 campaign.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Miller |first=Andrew |date=2024-03-08 |title=Indiana GOP Sen. Todd Young renews his pledge not to support Trump in 2024 |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/indiana-gop-sen-todd-young-renews-his-pledge-not-to-support-trump-in-2024 |access-date=2024-03-09 |website=Fox News |language=en-US}}</ref>


Organizations associated with this faction include [[The Lincoln Project]],<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Williams |first=Paige |date=2020-10-05 |title=Inside the Lincoln Project's War Against Trump |language=en-US |magazine=The New Yorker |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/12/inside-the-lincoln-projects-war-against-trump |access-date=2023-08-10 |issn=0028-792X}}</ref> [[Republican Accountability Project]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-07-26 |title=Republican Attack Ads in Iowa Show Conservative Voters Who Turned on Trump |language=en |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/us/politics/trump-ads-iowa.html |access-date=2023-08-10}}</ref> and [[Republicans for the Rule of Law]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-05-12 |title=Republican group airs anti-Trump advert on Fox News |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ad-fox-news-republicans-for-the-rule-of-law-rrl-a9510316.html |access-date=2023-08-10 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref>
Organizations associated with this faction include [[The Lincoln Project]],<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Williams |first=Paige |date=2020-10-05 |title=Inside the Lincoln Project's War Against Trump |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/12/inside-the-lincoln-projects-war-against-trump |access-date=2023-08-10 |magazine=The New Yorker |language=en-US |issn=0028-792X}}</ref> [[Republican Accountability Project]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-07-26 |title=Republican Attack Ads in Iowa Show Conservative Voters Who Turned on Trump |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/us/politics/trump-ads-iowa.html |access-date=2023-08-10 |language=en}}</ref> and [[Republicans for the Rule of Law]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-05-12 |title=Republican group airs anti-Trump advert on Fox News |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ad-fox-news-republicans-for-the-rule-of-law-rrl-a9510316.html |access-date=2023-08-10 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref>


==Political caucuses==
==Political caucuses==
Line 121: Line 122:
| {{composition bar|46|222|hex={{party color|Republican Party (United States)}}}}
| {{composition bar|46|222|hex={{party color|Republican Party (United States)}}}}
|}
|}

== History of Republican factions ==

=== Civil War and Reconstruction era ===
{{main|Radical Republicans}}
[[File:Thaddeus_Stevens_-_Brady-Handy-crop.jpg|thumb|U.S. representative [[Thaddeus Stevens]], considered a leader of the Radical Republicans, was a fierce opponent of slavery and discrimination against [[African Americans]].]]
During the 19th century, Republican factions included the [[Radical Republicans]]. They were a major factor of the party from its inception in 1854 until the end of the [[Reconstruction Era]] in 1877. They strongly opposed [[Slavery in the United States|slavery]], were hard-line [[Abolitionism|abolitionists]], and later advocated equal rights for the [[freedmen]] and women. They were heavily influenced by religious ideals and [[Evangelicalism|evangelical Christianity]]; many were [[Christians|Christian]] reformers who saw [[Slavery as a positive good in the United States|slavery as evil]] and the Civil War as God's punishment for it.<ref name="Howard2015">{{cite book |last=Howard |first=Victor B. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6bIfBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |title=Religion and the Radical Republican Movement, 1860–1870 |publisher=University Press of Kentucky |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-8131-6144-0 |access-date=March 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231215023724/https://books.google.com/books?id=6bIfBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false |archive-date=December 15, 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> Radical Republicans pressed for abolition as a major war aim and they opposed the moderate Reconstruction plans of Abraham Lincoln as both too lenient on the [[Confederate States of America|Confederates]] and not going far enough to help former slaves who had been freed during or after the Civil War by the [[Emancipation Proclamation]] and the [[Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Thirteenth Amendment]]. After the war's end and Lincoln's assassination, the Radicals clashed with [[Andrew Johnson]] over Reconstruction policy. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After unsuccessful measures in 1866 resulted in violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] for statutory protections through [[United States Congress|Congress]]. They opposed allowing ex-[[Confederate States of America|Confederate]] officers to retake political power in the [[Southern U.S.]], and emphasized liberty, equality, and the [[Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fifteenth Amendment]] which provided [[voting rights]] for the [[Freedman#United States|freedmen]]. Many later became [[Stalwarts]], who supported machine politics.

[[Moderate Republicans (Reconstruction era)|Moderate Republicans]] were known for their loyal support of President [[Abraham Lincoln]]'s war policies and expressed antipathy towards the more militant stances advocated by the Radical Republicans. According to historian [[Eric Foner]], congressional leaders of the faction were [[James G. Blaine]], [[John A. Bingham]], [[William P. Fessenden]], [[Lyman Trumbull]], and [[John Sherman]]. In contrast to Radicals, Moderate Republicans were less enthusiastic on the issue of Black suffrage even while embracing civil equality and the expansive federal authority observed throughout the [[American Civil War]]. They were also skeptical of the lenient, conciliatory Reconstruction policies of President Andrew Johnson. Members of the Moderate Republicans comprised in part of previous Radical Republicans who became disenchanted with the alleged corruption of the latter faction. [[Charles Sumner]], a [[Massachusetts]] senator who led Radical Republicans in the 1860s, later joined reform-minded moderates as he later opposed the corruption associated with the [[Grant administration]]. They generally opposed efforts by [[Radical Republicans]] to rebuild the Southern U.S. under an economically mobile, [[Free market|free-market]] system.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Foner |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Foner |title=Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 |year=1988 |edition=1st |pages=236–37}}</ref>

=== 20th century ===
[[File:Goldwater-Reagan_in_1964.jpg|thumb|[[Ronald Reagan]] speaks in support of Republican presidential candidate [[Barry Goldwater]] during [[1964 United States presidential election|the 1964 presidential election]]]]
The dawn on the 20th century saw the Republican party split into an [[Old Right (United States)|Old Right]] and a moderate-liberal faction in the Northeast that eventually became known as [[Rockefeller Republicans]]. Opposition to Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] saw the formation of the [[conservative coalition]].<ref name="Bowen">{{Cite web |title=The Roots of Modern Conservatism {{!}} Michael Bowen |url=https://www.uncpress.org/book/9781469618968/the-roots-of-modern-conservatism |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170522220118/https://www.uncpress.org/book/9781469618968/the-roots-of-modern-conservatism/ |archive-date=May 22, 2017 |access-date=May 20, 2019 |website=University of North Carolina Press}}</ref> The 1950s saw [[fusionism]] of traditionalist and social conservatism and right-libertarianism,<ref name="Fusionism">{{cite journal |last1=Ashbee |first1=Edward |last2=Waddan |first2=Alex |date=December 13, 2023 |title=US Republicans and the New Fusionism |journal=[[The Political Quarterly]] |language=en-us |volume=95 |pages=148–156 |doi=10.1111/1467-923X.13341 |issn=1467-923X |s2cid=266282896}}</ref> along with the rise of the [[New Right#United States|First New Right]] to be followed in 1964 with a more populist [[New Right#Second New Right|Second New Right]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gottfried |first1=Paul |author-link1=Paul Gottfried |title=The Conservative Movement |last2=Fleming |first2=Thomas |author-link2=Thomas Fleming (political writer) |publisher=Twayne Publishers |year=1988 |isbn=0805797238 |location=Boston |pages=77–95}}</ref> The rise of the [[Reagan coalition]] via the "Reagan Revolution" in the 1980s began what has been called the [[Reagan era]]. Regan's rise displaced the liberal-moderate faction of the GOP and established Reagan-style conservatism as the prevailing ideological faction of the Party for the next thirty years.<ref name="Ward 08-26-22">{{Cite news |last=Ward |first=Ian |date=August 26, 2022 |title=Trump Didn't Kill Reaganism. These Guys Did. |url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/08/26/reagan-conservatism-nicole-hemmer-q-and-a-00053858 |access-date=February 8, 2024 |work=Politico |language=en-US}}</ref>

=== 21st century ===
{{see also|Neoconservatism|Tea Party movement|Right-wing populism|Trumpism}}

Republicans began the 21st century with the election of [[George W. Bush]] in the [[2000 United States presidential election]] and saw the peak of a [[neoconservative]] faction that held significant influence over the initial American response to the [[September 11 attacks]] through the [[War on Terror]].<ref name="Rathburn 2008">{{cite journal |last1=Rathburn |first1=Brian C. |date=Summer 2008 |title=Does One Right Make a Realist? Conservatism, Neoconservatism, and Isolationism in the Foreign Policy Ideology of American Elites |journal=[[Political Science Quarterly]] |language=en-us |volume=123 |issue=2 |pages=271–299 |doi=10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00625.x |issn=1538-165X}}</ref> The election of [[Barack Obama]] saw the formation of the [[Tea Party movement]] in 2009 that coincided with a global rise in [[Right-wing populism|right-wing populist]] movements from the 2010s to 2020's.<ref name="Isaac20172">{{cite journal |last1=Isaac |first1=Jeffrey |date=November 2017 |title=Making America Great Again? |journal=Perspectives on Politics |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=15 |issue=3 |pages=625–631 |doi=10.1017/S1537592717000871 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Right-wing populism became an increasingly dominant ideological faction within the GOP throughout the 2010s and helped lead to the election of [[Donald Trump]] in 2016.<ref name="campani2">{{Cite journal |last1=Campani |first1=Giovanna |last2=Fabelo Concepción |first2=Sunamis |last3=Rodriguez Soler |first3=Angel |last4=Sánchez Savín |first4=Claudia |date=December 2022 |title=The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse |journal=Societies |language=en |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=154 |doi=10.3390/soc12060154 |issn=2075-4698 |doi-access=free}}</ref>

The Party has since faced intense factionalism,<ref name=":4">{{Cite news |last=Broadwater |first=Luke |date=2023-10-23 |title='5 Families' and Factions Within Factions: Why the House G.O.P. Can't Unite |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/23/us/politics/house-republicans-divisions-speaker.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231027050850/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/23/us/politics/house-republicans-divisions-speaker.html |archive-date=October 27, 2023 |access-date=2023-10-27 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=May 4, 2024 |title=The 8 Types Of Democrats And Republicans In The House |url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/types-democrats-republicans-house-2024/ |website=FiveThirtyEight}}</ref> and has also undergone a major decrease in influence of the traditional establishment conservative faction.<ref name="Biebricher-20232">{{Cite journal |last1=Biebricher |first1=Thomas |date=October 25, 2023 |title=The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective |journal=Politische Vierteljahresschrift |language=en |doi=10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2 |issn=2075-4698 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Arhin-20232">{{Cite journal |last1=Arhin |first1=Kofi |last2=Stockemer |first2=Daniel |last3=Normandin |first3=Marie-Soleil |date=May 29, 2023 |title=THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other? |journal=[[World Affairs]] |language=en |volume=186 |issue=3 |doi=10.1177/00438200231176818 |issn=1940-1582 |quote=In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP). |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Aratani-2021">{{cite news |last1=Aratani |first1=Lauren |date=26 February 2021 |title=Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/26/republicans-minimum-wage-bills-senate |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814230535/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/26/republicans-minimum-wage-bills-senate |archive-date=14 August 2021 |access-date=8 February 2024 |work=The Guardian |quote=In keeping with the party’s deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.}}</ref><ref name="Punchbowl Old GOP2">{{Cite news |last1=Desiderio |first1=Andrew |last2=Sherman |first2=Jake |last3=Bresnahan |first3=John |date=February 7, 2024 |title=The end of the Old GOP |url=https://punchbowl.news/article/the-end-of-the-old-republican-party-senate-conference/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240207114758/https://punchbowl.news/article/the-end-of-the-old-republican-party-senate-conference/ |archive-date=February 7, 2024 |access-date=February 8, 2024 |work=[[Punchbowl News]] |language=en-US}}</ref> Trump's election split both the GOP and larger conservative movement into [[Factions in the Republican Party (United States)#Trumpists|Trumpist]] and [[Never Trump movement|anti-Trump]] factions.<ref name="Johnson-McCray-Ragusa 20182">{{Cite journal |last1=Johnson |first1=Lauren R. |last2=McCray |first2=Deon |last3=Ragusa |first3=Jordan M. |date=January 11, 2018 |title=#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election |journal=Research & Politics |language=en |volume=5 |issue=1 |doi=10.1177/2053168017749383 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Swartz20222">{{Cite journal |last1=Swartz |first1=David L. |date=27 May 2022 |title=Trump divide among American conservative professors |journal=[[Theory & Society]] |language=en |volume=52 |issue=5 |pages=739–769 |doi=10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4 |issn=1573-7853 |pmc=10224651 |pmid=37362148 |doi-access=free}}</ref> These factions are particularly apparent in the [[United States House of Representatives|U.S House of Representatives.]] On January 7, 2023, After 15 rounds of voting, [[Kevin McCarthy]] was elected to the speakership.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-01-07 |title=McCarthy elected House speaker in rowdy post-midnight vote |url=https://apnews.com/article/politics-united-states-house-of-representatives-kevin-mccarthy-us-republican-party-0938c7358f41c83759246f8949ac7c15 |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref> Subsequently, he was [[Ouster of Kevin McCarthy|ousted]] from his position on October 3, 2023, by a vote led by 8 members of the Trumpist faction along with 208 House Democrats.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-03 |title=Speaker McCarthy ousted in historic House vote, as scramble begins for a Republican leader |url=https://apnews.com/article/mccarthy-gaetz-speaker-motion-to-vacate-congress-327e294a39f8de079ef5e4abfb1fa555 |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref>


== Historical factions ==
== Historical factions ==

Revision as of 17:55, 10 May 2024

The Republican Party of the United States is a big tent party composed of various factions. During the 19th century, Republican factions included the Half-Breeds, who supported civil service reform; the Radical Republicans, who advocated the immediate and total abolition of slavery, and later advocated civil rights for freed slaves during the Reconstruction era; and the Stalwarts, who supported machine politics.

In the 20th century, Republican factions included the Progressive Republicans, the Reagan coalition, and the liberal Rockefeller Republicans.

In the 21st century, Republican factions include conservatives (represented in Congress by the Republican Study Committee and the Freedom Caucus), moderates (represented in Congress by the Republican Governance Group and by the Republican members of the Problem Solvers Caucus), and libertarians (represented in Congress by the Republican Liberty Caucus). During and after the presidency of Donald Trump, Trumpist and anti-Trumpist factions arose within the Republican Party.

21st century factions

Former President Donald Trump

During the presidency of Barack Obama, the Republican Party experienced internal conflict between its governing class (known as the Republican establishment) and the anti-establishment, small-government Tea Party movement.[1][2][3][4] In 2012, The New York Times identified six wings of the Republican Party: Main Street Voters, Tea Party Voters, Christian Conservatives, Libertarians, The Disaffected, and The Endangered Or Vanished.[5] In 2014, the Pew Research Center split Republican-leaning voters into three groups: Steadfast Conservatives, Business Conservatives, and Young Outsiders.[6] In 2019, during the presidency of Donald Trump, Perry Bacon Jr. of FiveThirtyEight.com asserted that there were five groups of Republicans: Trumpists, Pro-Trumpers, Trump-Skeptical Conservatives, Trump-Skeptical Moderates, and Anti-Trumpers.[7]

In February 2021, following Trump's 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden and the 2021 United States Capitol attack, Philip Bump of The Washington Post posited that the Republican Party in the U.S. House of Representatives consisted of three factions: the Trumpists (who voted against the second impeachment of Donald Trump in 2021, voted against stripping Marjorie Taylor Greene of her committee assignments, and supported efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election), the accountability caucus (who supported either the Trump impeachment, the effort to discipline Greene, or both), and the pro-democracy Republicans (who opposed the Trump impeachment and the effort to discipline Greene but also opposed efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results).[8] Also in February 2021, Carl Leubsdorf of the Dallas Morning News asserted that there were three groups of Republicans: Never Trumpers (including Bill Kristol, Sen. Mitt Romney, and governors Charlie Baker and Larry Hogan), Sometimes Trumpers (including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley), and Always Trumpers (including Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley).[9]

In March 2021, one survey indicated that five factions of Republican voters had emerged following Trump's presidency: Never Trump, Post-Trump G.O.P. (voters who liked Trump but did not want him to run for president again), Trump Boosters (voters who approved of Trump, but identified more closely with the Republican Party than with Trump), Die-hard Trumpers, and Infowars G.O.P. (voters who subscribe to conspiracy theories).[10] In November 2021, Pew Research Center identified four Republican-aligned groups of Americans: Faith and Flag Conservatives, Committed Conservatives, the Populist Right, and the Ambivalent Right.[11]

As of 2023, congressional Republicans refer to the various House Republican factions as the Five Families.[12][13][14][15] Derived from The Godfather, the term refers to Mafia crime families.[13] The Five Families consist of "the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, the conservative Republican Study Committee, the business-minded Main Street Caucus, the mainstream Republican Governance Group", and the Republican members of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus. The House Republican factions overlap with one another.[14]

Conservatives

Percent of self-identified conservatives by state in 2010:[16]
  49% and above
  45–48%
  41–44%
  37–40%
  33–36%
  32% and under

The conservative wing grew out of the 1950s and 1960s, with its initial leaders being Senator Robert A. Taft, Russell Kirk, and William F. Buckley Jr. Its central tenets include the promotion of individual liberty and free-market economics and opposition to labor unions, high taxes, and government regulation.[17]

In economic policy, conservatives call for a large reduction in government spending, less regulation of the economy, and privatization or changes to Social Security. Supporters of supply-side economics and neoliberalism predominate, but there are fiscal conservatives, deficit hawks and protectionists within the party as well. Before 1930, the Northeastern pro-manufacturing faction of the GOP was strongly committed to high tariffs, a political stance that returned to popularity in many conservative circles during the Trump presidency.[18][19] The conservative wing typically supports socially conservative positions, such as supporting gun rights and restrictions on abortion, though there is a wide range of views on such issues within the party.[20]

Conservatives generally oppose affirmative action, support increased military spending, and are opposed to gun control. On the issue of school vouchers, conservative Republicans split between supporters who believe that "big government education" is a failure and opponents who fear greater government control over private and church schools. Parts of the conservative wing have been criticized for being anti-environmentalist[21][22][23] and promoting climate change denial[24][25][26] in opposition to the general scientific consensus, making them unique even among other worldwide conservative parties.[26]

Long-term shifts in conservative thinking following the election of Trump have been described as a "new fusionism" of traditional conservative ideology and right-wing populist themes.[27] These have resulted in shifts towards greater support of national conservatism,[28] protectionism,[29] cultural conservatism, a more realist foreign policy, a repudiation of neoconservatism, reduced efforts to roll back entitlement programs, and a disdain for traditional checks and balances.[27][30]

Moderates

Moderate Republicans tend to be conservative-to-moderate on fiscal issues and moderate-to-liberal on social issues, and usually represent swing states or blue states. Moderate Republican voters are typically highly educated, affluent, socially moderate or liberal and often Never Trump.[31] Ideologically, such Republicans resemble the conservative liberals of Europe.[32]

While they sometimes share the economic views of other Republicans (i.e. lower taxes, deregulation, and welfare reform), moderate Republicans differ in that some are for affirmative action,[33] LGBT rights and same-sex marriage, legal access to and even public funding for abortion, gun control laws, more environmental regulation and action on climate change, fewer restrictions on immigration and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and embryonic stem cell research.[34][35] In the 21st century, some former Republican moderates have switched to the Democratic Party.[36][37][38]

Prominent 21st century moderate Republicans include Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine[39][40][41][42] and several current or former governors of northeastern states, such as Charlie Baker of Massachusetts[43] and Phil Scott of Vermont.[44] Another moderate Republican is incumbent governor of Nevada Joe Lombardo, who was previously the Sheriff of Clark County.[45] Moderate Republican Representatives include Brian Fitzpatrick, Don Bacon, and ex-Representative John Katko.[46]

One of the most high-ranking moderate Republicans in recent history was Colin Powell as Secretary of State in the first term of the George W. Bush administration (Powell left the Republican Party in January 2021 following the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol, and had endorsed every Democrat for president in the general election since 2008).[47]

The Republican Governance Group is a caucus of moderate Republicans within the House of Representatives.[13]

Christian right

The Christian right is a conservative Christian political faction characterized by strong support of socially conservative and Christian nationalist policies.[48][49][50] Christian conservatives seek to use the teachings of Christianity to influence law and public policy.[51]

In the United States, the Christian right is an informal coalition formed around a core of evangelical Protestants and conservative Roman Catholics, as well as a large number of Latter-day Saints (Mormons).[52][53][54][55] The movement has its roots in American politics going back as far as the 1940s and has been especially influential since the 1970s.[56] In the late 20th century, the Christian right became strongly connected to the Republican Party.[57] Republican politicians associated with the Christian right in the 21st century include Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, and former Senator Rick Santorum.[58] Many within the Christian right have also identified as social conservatives, which sociologist Harry F. Dahms has described as Christian doctrinal conservatives (anti-abortion, anti-LGBT rights) and gun-rights conservatives (pro-NRA) as the two domains of ideology within social conservatism.[59] Christian nationalists generally seek to declare the U.S. a Christian nation, enforce Christian values, and overturn the separation of church and state.[49][50]

Libertarians

Libertarians make up a relatively small faction of the Republican Party.[6][60] In the 1950s and 60s, fusionism—the combination of traditionalist and social conservatism with political and economic right-libertarianism—was essential to the movement's growth.[61] This philosophy is most closely associated with Frank Meyer.[62] Barry Goldwater also had a substantial impact on the conservative-libertarian movement of the 1960s.[63]

Libertarian conservatives in the 21st century favor cutting taxes and regulations, repealing the Affordable Care Act, and protecting gun rights.[5] On social issues, they favor privacy, oppose the USA Patriot Act, and oppose the War on Drugs.[5] On foreign policy, libertarian conservatives favor non-interventionism.[64][65] The Republican Liberty Caucus, which describes itself as "the oldest continuously operating organization in the Liberty Republican movement with state charters nationwide", was founded in 1991.[66] The House Liberty Caucus is a congressional caucus formed by former Representative Justin Amash, a former Republican of Michigan who is now a member of the Libertarian Party.[67]

Prominent libertarian conservatives within the Republican Party include New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu,[68][69] Senators Mike Lee and Rand Paul, Representative Thomas Massie, former Representative and Governor of South Carolina Mark Sanford,[70] and former Representative Ron Paul[71] (who was a Republican prior to 1987 and again from 1996 to 2015, and a Libertarian from 1987 to 1996 and since 2015). Ron Paul ran for president once as a Libertarian and twice more recently as a Republican.

The libertarian conservative wing of the party had significant cross-over with the Tea Party movement.[72][73]

Neoconservatives

Neoconservatives promote an interventionist foreign policy to promote democracy or American interests abroad. Many neoconservatives were in earlier days identified as liberals or were affiliated with the Democrats. Neoconservatives have been credited with importing into the Republican Party a more active international policy. Neoconservatives are amenable to unilateral military action when they believe it serves a morally valid purpose (such as the spread of democracy).[74][75] Many of its adherents became politically famous during the Republican presidential administrations of the late 20th century, and neoconservatism peaked in influence during the administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, when they played a major role in promoting and planning the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[76]

Prominent neoconservatives in the Bush-Cheney administration included John Bolton, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, and Paul Bremer. During and after Donald Trump's presidency, neoconservatism has declined and non-interventionism and isolationism has grown among elected federal Republican officeholders.[77][78]

Republican members of the 118th Congress with neoconservative stances include Senators Tom Cotton[79] and Lindsey Graham.[80]

Trumpists

Sometimes referred to as the MAGA or "America First" movement,[81][82] Trumpists are the dominant faction in the Republican Party as of 2024.[83][84][85][86][87] It has been described as consisting of a range of right-wing ideologies including but not limited to right-wing populism,[88][89][90] national conservatism,[91] neo-nationalism,[92] and Trumpism, the political movement associated with Donald Trump and his base.[93][94] They have been described by some commentators, including Joseph Lowndes, James A. Gardner, and Guy-Uriel Charles, as the American political variant of the far-right.[95][96][97]

Despite producing no manifesto,[98] the Trumpist faction supports cuts to spending.[99][100] In international relations, Trumpists support U.S. aid to Israel but not to Ukraine,[101][102] are generally supportive towards Russia,[103][104][105] and favor an isolationist "America First" foreign policy agenda.[106][107][108][109] They generally reject compromise within the party and with the Democrats,[110][111] and are willing to oust fellow Republican office holders they deem to be too moderate.[112][113] Compared to other Republicans, the Trumpist faction is more likely to be immigration restrictionists,[114] and to be against free trade,[115] neoconservatism,[116] and environmental protection laws.[117]

The Republican Party's populist and far-right movements emerged in occurrence with a global increase in populist movements in the 2010s and 2020s,[118] coupled with entrenchment and increased partisanship within the party since 2010, fueled by the rise of the Tea Party movement which has also been described as far-right.[119] The election of Trump in 2016 split the party into pro-Trump and anti-Trump factions.[120][121]

When conservative columnist George Will advised voters of all ideologies to vote for Democratic candidates in the Senate and House elections of November 2018,[122] political writer Dan McLaughlin at the National Review responded that doing so would make the Trumpist faction even more powerful within the Republican party.[123] Anticipating Trump's likely defeat in the U.S. presidential election held on November 3, 2020, Peter Feaver wrote in Foreign Policy magazine: "With victory having been so close, the Trumpist faction in the party will be empowered and in no mood to compromise or reform."[124] A poll conducted in February 2021 indicated that a plurality of Republicans (46% versus 27%) would leave the Republican Party to join a new party if Trump chose to create it.[125] Nick Beauchamp, assistant professor of political science at Northeastern University, says he sees the country as divided into four parties, with two factions representing each of the Democratic and Republican parties: "For the GOP, there's the Trump faction—which is the larger group—and the non-Trump faction".[126]

Lilliana Mason, associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, states that Donald Trump solidified the trend among Southern white conservative Democrats since the 1960s of leaving the Democratic Party and joining the Republican Party: "Trump basically worked as a lightning rod to finalize that process of creating the Republican Party as a single entity for defending the high status of white, Christian, rural Americans. It's not a huge percentage of Americans that holds these beliefs, and it's not even the entire Republican Party; it's just about half of it. But the party itself is controlled by this intolerant, very strongly pro-Trump faction."[127]

Rachel Kleinfeld, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, describes it as an authoritarian, antidemocratic movement that has successfully weaponized cultural issues, and that cultivates a narrative placing white people, Christians, and men at the top of a status hierarchy as its response to the so-called "Great Replacement" theory, a claim that minorities, immigrants, and women, enabled by Democrats, Jews, and elites, are displacing white people, Christians, and men from their rightful positions in American society.[128]

In 2022, a faction emerged of Trump loyalists within the Freedom Caucus known as the 'MAGA Squad', including Paul Gosar, Marjorie Greene, Matt Gaetz, Madison Cawthorn, Louie Gohmert, Mary Miller, Mo Brooks, Andy Biggs, Scott Perry and Lauren Boebert. While "not a formal caucus", it was described as more radical than the mainstream Freedom Caucus,[129][130][131] and supportive of primary challenges against incumbent Republicans during the 2022 United States House of Representatives elections.[132][133]

In a speech he gave on November 2, 2022, at Washington's Union Station near the U.S. Capitol, President Biden asserted that "the pro-Trump faction" of the Republican Party is trying to undermine the U.S. electoral system and suppress voting rights.[134][135]

Anti-Trump faction

A divide has formed in the party between those who remain loyal to Donald Trump and those who oppose him.[136] A recent survey concluded that the Republican Party was divided between pro-Trump (the "Trump Boosters," "Die-hard Trumpers," and "Infowars G.O.P." wings) and anti-Trump factions (the "Never Trump" and "Post-Trump G.O.P." wings).[10] Senator John McCain was an early leading critic of Trumpism within the Republican Party, refusing to support the then-Republican presidential nominee in the 2016 presidential election.[137]

Several critics of the Trump faction have faced various forms of retaliation. Representative Liz Cheney was removed from her position as Republican conference chair in the House of Representatives, which was perceived as retaliation for her criticism of Trump;[138] in 2022, she was defeated by a pro-Trump primary challenger.[139] Representative Adam Kinzinger decided to retire at the end of his term, while Murkowski faced a pro-Trump primary challenger in 2022 against Kelly Tshibaka whom she defeated.[140][141] A primary challenge to Romney had been suggested[142] by Jason Chaffetz, who has criticized his opponents within the Republican Party as "Trump haters".[143] Representative Anthony Gonzalez, one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump over the Capitol riot, called him "a cancer" while announcing his retirement.[144] Former Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie, who was running against Trump in the 2024 Republican primaries, called him "a lonely, self-consumed, self-serving, mirror hog" in his presidential announcement.[145] Indiana senator Todd Young is one of few elected Republican senators that has pledged to not support Trump's 2024 campaign.[146]

Organizations associated with this faction include The Lincoln Project,[147] Republican Accountability Project[148] and Republicans for the Rule of Law.[149]

Political caucuses

Election year Republican Study Committee Republican Governance Group Freedom Caucus
2020
157 / 213
45 / 213
45 / 213
2022
156 / 222
42 / 222
46 / 222

History of Republican factions

Civil War and Reconstruction era

U.S. representative Thaddeus Stevens, considered a leader of the Radical Republicans, was a fierce opponent of slavery and discrimination against African Americans.

During the 19th century, Republican factions included the Radical Republicans. They were a major factor of the party from its inception in 1854 until the end of the Reconstruction Era in 1877. They strongly opposed slavery, were hard-line abolitionists, and later advocated equal rights for the freedmen and women. They were heavily influenced by religious ideals and evangelical Christianity; many were Christian reformers who saw slavery as evil and the Civil War as God's punishment for it.[150] Radical Republicans pressed for abolition as a major war aim and they opposed the moderate Reconstruction plans of Abraham Lincoln as both too lenient on the Confederates and not going far enough to help former slaves who had been freed during or after the Civil War by the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment. After the war's end and Lincoln's assassination, the Radicals clashed with Andrew Johnson over Reconstruction policy. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After unsuccessful measures in 1866 resulted in violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the Fourteenth Amendment for statutory protections through Congress. They opposed allowing ex-Confederate officers to retake political power in the Southern U.S., and emphasized liberty, equality, and the Fifteenth Amendment which provided voting rights for the freedmen. Many later became Stalwarts, who supported machine politics.

Moderate Republicans were known for their loyal support of President Abraham Lincoln's war policies and expressed antipathy towards the more militant stances advocated by the Radical Republicans. According to historian Eric Foner, congressional leaders of the faction were James G. Blaine, John A. Bingham, William P. Fessenden, Lyman Trumbull, and John Sherman. In contrast to Radicals, Moderate Republicans were less enthusiastic on the issue of Black suffrage even while embracing civil equality and the expansive federal authority observed throughout the American Civil War. They were also skeptical of the lenient, conciliatory Reconstruction policies of President Andrew Johnson. Members of the Moderate Republicans comprised in part of previous Radical Republicans who became disenchanted with the alleged corruption of the latter faction. Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts senator who led Radical Republicans in the 1860s, later joined reform-minded moderates as he later opposed the corruption associated with the Grant administration. They generally opposed efforts by Radical Republicans to rebuild the Southern U.S. under an economically mobile, free-market system.[151]

20th century

Ronald Reagan speaks in support of Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater during the 1964 presidential election

The dawn on the 20th century saw the Republican party split into an Old Right and a moderate-liberal faction in the Northeast that eventually became known as Rockefeller Republicans. Opposition to Roosevelt's New Deal saw the formation of the conservative coalition.[152] The 1950s saw fusionism of traditionalist and social conservatism and right-libertarianism,[153] along with the rise of the First New Right to be followed in 1964 with a more populist Second New Right.[154] The rise of the Reagan coalition via the "Reagan Revolution" in the 1980s began what has been called the Reagan era. Regan's rise displaced the liberal-moderate faction of the GOP and established Reagan-style conservatism as the prevailing ideological faction of the Party for the next thirty years.[155]

21st century

Republicans began the 21st century with the election of George W. Bush in the 2000 United States presidential election and saw the peak of a neoconservative faction that held significant influence over the initial American response to the September 11 attacks through the War on Terror.[156] The election of Barack Obama saw the formation of the Tea Party movement in 2009 that coincided with a global rise in right-wing populist movements from the 2010s to 2020's.[157] Right-wing populism became an increasingly dominant ideological faction within the GOP throughout the 2010s and helped lead to the election of Donald Trump in 2016.[158]

The Party has since faced intense factionalism,[159][160] and has also undergone a major decrease in influence of the traditional establishment conservative faction.[161][162][163][164] Trump's election split both the GOP and larger conservative movement into Trumpist and anti-Trump factions.[165][166] These factions are particularly apparent in the U.S House of Representatives. On January 7, 2023, After 15 rounds of voting, Kevin McCarthy was elected to the speakership.[167] Subsequently, he was ousted from his position on October 3, 2023, by a vote led by 8 members of the Trumpist faction along with 208 House Democrats.[168]

Historical factions

Half-Breeds

The Half-Breeds were a reformist faction of the 1870s and 1880s. The name, which originated with rivals claiming they were only "half" Republicans, came to encompass a wide array of figures who did not all get along with each other. Generally speaking, politicians labeled Half-Breeds were moderates or progressives who opposed the machine politics of the Stalwarts and advanced civil service reforms.[171]

Progressive Republicans

President Theodore Roosevelt

Historically, the Republican Party included a progressive wing that advocated using government to improve the problems of modern society. Theodore Roosevelt, an early leader of the progressive movement, advanced a "Square Deal" domestic program as president (1901–09) that was built on the goals of controlling corporations, protecting consumers, and conserving natural resources.[172] After splitting with his successor, William Howard Taft, in the aftermath of the Pinchot–Ballinger controversy,[173] Roosevelt sought to block Taft's re-election, first by challenging him for the 1912 Republican presidential nomination, and then when that failed, by entering the 1912 presidential contest as a third party candidate, running on the Progressive ticket. He succeeded in depriving Taft of a second term, but came in second behind Democrat Woodrow Wilson.

After Roosevelt's 1912 defeat, the progressive wing of the party went into decline. Progressive Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives held a "last stand" protest in December 1923, at the start of the 68th Congress, when they refused to support the Republican Conference nominee for Speaker of the House, Frederick H. Gillett, voting instead for two other candidates. After eight ballots spanning two days, they agreed to support Gillett in exchange for a seat on the House Rules Committee and pledges that subsequent rules changes would be considered. On the ninth ballot, Gillett received 215 votes, a majority of the 414 votes cast, to win the election.[174]

In addition to Theodore Roosevelt, leading early progressive Republicans included Robert M. La Follette, Charles Evans Hughes, Hiram Johnson, William Borah, George W. Norris, William Allen White, Victor Murdock, Clyde M. Reed and Fiorello La Guardia.[175]

Radical Republicans

Frank Leslie's Illustrated "Grant's Last Outrage in Louisiana", January 23, 1875

The Radical Republicans were a major factor of the party from its inception in 1854 until the end of the Reconstruction Era in 1877. The Radicals strongly opposed slavery, were hard-line abolitionists, and later advocated equal rights for the freedmen and women. They were often at odds with the moderate and conservative factions of the party. During the American Civil War, Radical Republicans pressed for abolition as a major war aim and they opposed the moderate Reconstruction plans of Abraham Lincoln as too lenient on the Confederates. After the war's end and Lincoln's assassination, the Radicals clashed with Andrew Johnson over Reconstruction policy.[176]

After winning major victories in the 1866 congressional elections, the Radicals took over Reconstruction, pushing through new legislation protecting the civil rights of African Americans. John C. Frémont of Michigan, the party's first nominee for president in 1856, was a Radical Republican. Upset with Lincoln's politics, the faction split from the Republican Party to form the short-lived Radical Democracy Party in 1864 and again nominated Frémont for president. They supported Ulysses S. Grant for president in 1868 and 1872. As Southern Democrats retook control in the South and enthusiasm for continued Reconstruction declined in the North, their influence within the GOP waned.[176]

Reagan coalition

President Ronald Reagan, namesake of the Reagan coalition

According to historian George H. Nash, the Reagan coalition in the Republican Party, which centered around Ronald Reagan and his administration throughout all of the 1980s (continuing in the late 1980s with the George H. W. Bush administration), originally consisted of five factions: the libertarians, the traditionalists, the anti-communists, the neoconservatives, and the religious right (which consisted of Protestants, Catholics, and some Jewish Republicans).[17][177]

Rockefeller Republicans

Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, namesake of the Rockefeller Republicans

Moderate or liberal Republicans in the 20th century, particularly those from the Northeast and West Coast, were referred to as "The Eastern Establishment" or "Rockefeller Republicans", after Nelson Rockefeller.[178][179][180]

With their power decreasing in the final decades of the 20th century, many Rockefeller-style Republicans were replaced by conservative and moderate Democrats, such as those from the Blue Dog or New Democrat coalitions. Massachusetts Republican Elliot Richardson (who served in several cabinet positions during the Nixon administration) and writer and academic Michael Lind argued that the liberalism of Democratic President Bill Clinton and the Third Way movement were in many ways to the right of Dwight Eisenhower, Rockefeller, Nixon, and John Lindsay, Republican Congressman and Mayor of New York City in the late 1960s.[181][182]

Stalwarts

The Stalwarts were a traditionalist faction that existed from the 1860s through the 1880s. They represented "traditional" Republicans who favored machine politics and opposed the civil service reforms of Rutherford B. Hayes and the more progressive Half-Breeds.[183] They declined following the elections of Hayes and James A. Garfield. After Garfield's assassination by Charles J. Guiteau, his Stalwart Vice President Chester A. Arthur assumed the presidency. However, rather than pursuing Stalwart goals he took up the reformist cause, which curbed the faction's influence.[171]

Tea Party movement

Former Representative Ron Paul

The Tea Party movement was an American fiscally conservative political movement within the Republican Party that began in 2009 following the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States.[184][185] Members of the movement have called for lower taxes, and for a reduction of the national debt of the United States and federal budget deficit through decreased government spending.[186][187] The movement supports small-government principles[188][189] and opposes government-sponsored universal healthcare.[190] It has been described as a popular constitutional movement.[191]

On matters of foreign policy, the movement largely supports avoiding being drawn into unnecessary conflicts and opposes "liberal internationalism".[192] Its name refers to the Boston Tea Party of December 16, 1773, a watershed event in the launch of the American Revolution.[193] By 2016, Politico said that the modern Tea Party movement was "pretty much dead now"; however, the article noted that it seemed to die in part because some of its ideas had been "co-opted" by the mainstream Republican Party.[194]

Politicians associated with the Tea Party include former Representatives Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann and Allen West,[195][196] Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Rand Paul and Tim Scott,[197][198][199] former Senator Jim DeMint,[198] former acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney,[200] and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.[196] Although there has never been any one clear founder or leader of the movement, Palin scored highest in a 2010 Washington Post poll asking Tea Party organizers "which national figure best represents your groups?".[201] Ron Paul was described in a 2011 Atlantic article as its "intellectual godfather".[202] Both Paul and Palin, although ideologically different in many ways, had a major influence on the emergence of the movement due to their separate 2008 presidential primary and vice presidential general election runs respectively.[203][192]

Several political organizations were created in response to the movement's growing popularity in the late 2000s and into the early 2010s, including the Tea Party Patriots, Tea Party Express and Tea Party Caucus.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Republicans and Tea Party Activists in 'Full Scale Civil War'". ABC News. December 12, 2013.
  2. ^ "GOP Establishment Grapples With A Tea Party That Won't Budge". NPR.org. October 2, 2013. Archived from the original on September 14, 2015.
  3. ^ Abramowitz, Alan (November 14, 2013). "Not Their Cup of Tea: The Republican Establishment versus the Tea Party". CenterForPolitics.org. Archived from the original on November 16, 2013.
  4. ^ "Establishment Vs. Tea Party in Primary Showdowns". www.cbsnews.com. September 14, 2010. Archived from the original on January 17, 2022.
  5. ^ a b c "A New Guide to the Republican Herd". archive.nytimes.com. August 26, 2012.
  6. ^ a b Pew Research Center (June 26, 2014). "Beyond Red vs Blue:The Political Typology". Archived from the original on June 29, 2014.
  7. ^ Bacon, Perry (March 27, 2019). "The Five Wings Of The Republican Party". FiveThirtyEight.com.
  8. ^ Bump, Philip (February 5, 2021). "The Three Factions of House Republicans". The Washington Post.
  9. ^ "The GOP is divided into 3 warring factions focused on Trump: Never, Sometimes and Always". Dallas News. February 18, 2021.
  10. ^ a b Haberman, Maggie (March 12, 2021). "A survey of Republicans shows 5 factions have emerged after Trump's presidency". The New York Times.
  11. ^ "The Republican Coalition among the U.S. electorate". PewResearch.org. November 9, 2021.
  12. ^ Blanco, Adrian; Sotomayor, Marianna; Dormido, Hannah (March 24, 2023). "Meet 'the five families' that wield power in McCarthy's House majority". washingtonpost.com.
  13. ^ a b c Wilkins, Emily (February 28, 2023). "McCarthy Turns to 'Five Families' to Keep Peace Among GOP Rivals".
  14. ^ a b Broadwater, Luke (October 23, 2023). "'5 Families' and Factions Within Factions; Why the House G.O.P. Can't Unite". The New York Times.
  15. ^ Raju, Manu; Zanona, Melanie (February 13, 2023). "Kevin McCarthy leans on 'five families' as House GOP plots debt-limit tactics". CNN.com.
  16. ^ Jones, Jeffrey (August 2, 2010). "Wyoming, Mississippi, Utah Rank as Most Conservative States". Gallup. Retrieved October 6, 2016.
  17. ^ a b Donald T. Critchlow. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History (2nd ed. 2011).
  18. ^ Aberbach, Joel D.; Peele, Gillian (2011). Crisis of Conservatism?:The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 9780199831364. Archived from the original on February 20, 2018.
  19. ^ Becker, Bernie (February 13, 2016). "Trump's 6 populist positions". POLITICO. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  20. ^ William Martin, With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America (1996).
  21. ^ Shabecoff, Philip (2000). Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century. Island Press. p. 125. ISBN 9781597263351. Retrieved November 9, 2017. republican party anti-environmental.
  22. ^ Hayes, Samuel P. (2000). A History of Environmental Politics Since 1945. University of Pittsburgh Press. p. 119. ISBN 9780822972242. Archived from the original on February 20, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
  23. ^ Sellers, Christopher (June 7, 2017). "How Republicans came to embrace anti-environmentalism". Vox. Archived from the original on November 2, 2017. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
  24. ^ Dunlap, Riley E.; McCright, Araon M. (August 7, 2010). "A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change". Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 50 (5): 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35. S2CID 154964336.
  25. ^ Båtstrand, Sondre (2015). "More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change". Politics and Policy. 43 (4): 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122. ISSN 1747-1346. The U.S. Republican Party is an anomaly in denying anthropogenic climate change.
  26. ^ a b Chait, Jonathan (September 27, 2015). "Why Are Republicans the Only Climate-Science-Denying Party in the World?". New York. Archived from the original on July 21, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2017. Of all the major conservative parties in the democratic world, the Republican Party stands alone in its denial of the legitimacy of climate science. Indeed, the Republican Party stands alone in its conviction that no national or international response to climate change is needed. To the extent that the party is divided on the issue, the gap separates candidates who openly dismiss climate science as a hoax, and those who, shying away from the political risks of blatant ignorance, instead couch their stance in the alleged impossibility of international action.
  27. ^ a b Ashbee, Edward; Waddan, Alex (December 13, 2023). "US Republicans and the New Fusionism". The Political Quarterly. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13341. ISSN 1467-923X.
  28. ^ "The growing peril of national conservatism". The Economist. February 15, 2024. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
  29. ^ "The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation". The Economist. October 26, 2023. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  30. ^ Garcia-Navarro, Lulu (January 21, 2024). "Inside the Heritage Foundation's Plans for 'Institutionalizing Trumpism'". The New York Times Magazine. New York City: The New York Times Company. ISSN 0028-7822. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  31. ^ Cohn, Nate (August 17, 2023). "The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 12, 2023. Retrieved October 9, 2023.
  32. ^ Slomp, Hans (2011). Europe: A Political Profile. Vol. 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 107. Most European liberals are Conservative Liberals, located at the right end of the left-right line, exactly opposite the American liberals' position. If transplanted to the United States, they would occupy the Left wing and the center of the Republican Party. Only the less numerous social liberals resemble American liberals.
  33. ^ "Losing Its Preference: Affirmative Action Fades as Issue". The Washington Post. 1996. Archived from the original on February 23, 2017.
  34. ^ Silverleib, Alan. "Analysis: An autopsy of liberal Republicans". cnn.com. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
  35. ^ Pear, Robert (June 19, 2001). "Several G.O.P. Senators Back Money for Stem Cell Research". The New York Times. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
  36. ^ Tatum, Sophie (December 20, 2018). "3 Kansas legislators switch from Republican to Democrat". CNN. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  37. ^ Weiner, Rachel. "Charlie Crist defends party switch". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  38. ^ Hornick, Ed; Walsh, Deidre. "Longtime GOP Sen. Arlen Specter becomes Democrat". CNN. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  39. ^ Plott, Elaina (October 6, 2018). "Two Moderate Senators, Two Very Different Paths". The Atlantic. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  40. ^ Faludi, Susan (July 5, 2018). "Opinion - Senators Collins and Murkowski, It's Time to Leave the G.O.P." The New York Times. Retrieved February 23, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
  41. ^ Petre, Linda (September 25, 2018). "Kavanaugh's fate rests with Sen. Collins". TheHill. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  42. ^ Connolly, Griffin (October 9, 2018). "Sen. Lisa Murkowski Could Face Reprisal from Alaska GOP". rollcall.com. Archived from the original on October 11, 2018. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  43. ^ Bacon, Perry (March 30, 2018). "How A Massachusetts Republican Became One Of America's Most Popular Politicians". fivethirtyeight.com. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  44. ^ "If moderate Republicans don't want to go to Washington, how will things ever change?". BostonGlobe.com. November 18, 2021.
  45. ^ "Nevada governor signs new abortion protections into law". NBC News. March 31, 2023.
  46. ^ "These Are the Most Bipartisan Politicians - No Labels". www.nolabels.org. Retrieved April 7, 2024.
  47. ^ Pitofsky, Marina (January 10, 2021). "Colin Powell: 'I can no longer call myself a fellow Republican'". The Hill. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  48. ^ Whitehead, Andrew L.; Perry, Samuel L.; Baker, Joseph O. (January 25, 2018). "Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election". Sociology of Religion. 79 (2): 147–171. doi:10.1093/socrel/srx070. The current study establishes that, independent of these influences, voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States' perceived Christian heritage. Data from a national probability sample of Americans surveyed soon after the 2016 election shows that greater adherence to Christian nationalist ideology was a robust predictor of voting for Trump, even after controlling for economic dissatisfaction, sexism, anti-black prejudice, anti-Muslim refugee attitudes, and anti-immigrant sentiment, as well as measures of religion, sociodemographics, and political identity more generally.
  49. ^ a b Smith, Peter (February 17, 2024). "Many believe the founders wanted a Christian America. Some want the government to declare one now". Associated Press. New York. Archived from the original on February 19, 2024. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
  50. ^ a b Rouse, Stella; Telhami, Shibley (September 21, 2022). "Most Republicans Support Declaring the United States a Christian Nation". Politico. Archived from the original on September 27, 2022. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
  51. ^ Anderson, Margaret L.; Taylor, Howard Francis (2006). Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0-534-61716-5.
  52. ^ Deckman, Melissa Marie (2004). School Board Battles: The Christian Right in Local Politics. Georgetown University Press. p. 48. ISBN 9781589010017. Retrieved April 10, 2014. More than half of all Christian right candidates attend evangelical Protestant churches, which are more theologically liberal. A relatively large number of Christian Right candidates (24 percent) are Catholics; however, when asked to describe themselves as either "progressive/liberal" or "traditional/conservative" Catholics, 88 percent of these Christian right candidates place themselves in the traditional category.
  53. ^ Schweber, Howard (February 24, 2012). "The Catholicization of the American Right". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 24, 2012.
  54. ^ Melissa Marie Deckman (2004). School Board Battles: the Christian right in Local Politics. Georgetown University Press.
  55. ^ "Five things you should know about Mormon politics". Religion News Service. April 27, 2015. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  56. ^ "Christian Right". hirr.hartsem.edu. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016.
  57. ^ Haberman, Clyde (October 28, 2018). "Religion and Right-Wing Politics: How Evangelicals Reshaped Elections". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 29, 2018. Retrieved February 23, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
  58. ^ Cohn, Nate (May 5, 2015). "Mike Huckabee and the Continuing Influence of Evangelicals". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 6, 2015. Retrieved February 23, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
  59. ^ Smith, Robert B. (2014). "Social Conservatism, Distractors, and Authoritarianism: Axiological versus instrumental rationality". In Dahms, Harry F. (ed.). Mediations of Social Life in the 21st Century. Emerald Group Publishing. p. 101. ISBN 9781784412227.
  60. ^ Silver, Nate (April 9, 2015). "There are Few Libertarians But Many Americans Have Libertarian Views". Archived from the original on April 28, 2017.
  61. ^ Dionne Jr., E.J. (1991). Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 161.
  62. ^ Meyer, Frank (1996). In Defense of Freedom and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  63. ^ Poole, Robert (August–September 1998), "In memoriam: Barry Goldwater", Reason (Obituary), archived from the original on June 28, 2009
  64. ^ Barnett, Randy E. (July 17, 2007). "Libertarians and the War". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  65. ^ "Toward a Libertarian Foreign Policy". Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  66. ^ History of the RLC, Republican Liberty Caucus (accessed August 19, 2016).
  67. ^ Robert Draper, Has the 'Libertarian Moment' Finally Arrived?, New York Times Magazine (August 7, 2016).
  68. ^ "Chris Sununu on the Issues". www.ontheissues.org. Retrieved December 18, 2018.
  69. ^ Voght, Kara (October 1, 2022). "The Republican Who's Thriving Despite Calling Trump 'F–king Crazy'". Rolling Stone. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  70. ^ Josh Goodman, South Carolina's "Libertarian" Governor Archived 2016-09-16 at the Wayback Machine, Governing (August 4, 2008).
  71. ^ "Libertarians go local". Washington Examiner. August 12, 2018. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  72. ^ Ekins, Emily (September 26, 2011). "Is Half the Tea Party Libertarian?". Reason. Archived from the original on May 11, 2012. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  73. ^ Kirby, David; Ekins, Emily McClintock (August 6, 2012). "Libertarian Roots of the Tea Party". Cato. Archived from the original on December 4, 2018. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  74. ^ John Ehrman. The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectual and Foreign Affairs 1945–1994 (2005).
  75. ^ Justin Vaïsse. Neoconservatism: The Biography of a Movement (2010).
  76. ^ Record, Jeffery. Wanting War: Why the Bush Administration Invaded Iraq. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 47–50.
  77. ^ Rucker, Philip; Costa, Robert (March 21, 2016). "Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy". The Washington Post.
  78. ^ Dodson, Kyle; Brooks, Clem (September 20, 2021). "All by Himself? Trump, Isolationism, and the American Electorate". The Sociological Quarterly. 63 (4): 780–803. doi:10.1080/00380253.2021.1966348. ISSN 0038-0253. S2CID 240577549.
  79. ^ Beauchamp, Zack (November 5, 2014). "Meet Tom Cotton: Arkansas's next Senator and Rand Paul's worst nightmare". Vox.
  80. ^ Binelli, Mark (January 6, 2020). "How Lindsey Graham Lost His Way". Rolling Stone.
  81. ^ "Panel Study of the MAGA Movement". University of Washington. January 6, 2021. Retrieved March 24, 2024.
  82. ^ Gabbatt, Adam; Smith, David (August 19, 2023). "'America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump". the Guardian. Retrieved March 24, 2024.
  83. ^ Ball, Molly (January 23, 2024). "The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
  84. ^ Biebricher, Thomas (October 25, 2023). "The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective". Politische Vierteljahresschrift. doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2. ISSN 2075-4698.
  85. ^ Arhin, Kofi; Stockemer, Daniel; Normandin, Marie-Soleil (May 29, 2023). "THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other?". World Affairs. 186 (3). doi:10.1177/0043820023117681. ISSN 1940-1582. In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP).
  86. ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Sherman, Jake; Bresnahan, John (February 7, 2024). "The end of the Old GOP". Punchbowl News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2024. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
  87. ^ Aratani, Lauren (February 26, 2021). "Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved September 7, 2021. In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.
  88. ^ Campani, Giovanna; Fabelo Concepción, Sunamis; Rodriguez Soler, Angel; Sánchez Savín, Claudia (December 2022). "The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse". Societies. 12 (6): 154. doi:10.3390/soc12060154. ISSN 2075-4698.
  89. ^ Norris, Pippa (November 2020). "Measuring populism worldwide". Party Politics. 26 (6): 697–717. doi:10.1177/1354068820927686. ISSN 1354-0688. S2CID 216298689.
  90. ^ Cassidy, John (February 29, 2016). "Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
  91. ^ ""National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism". The Economist. London: The Economist Group. February 15, 2024. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024.
  92. ^ Zhou, Shaoqing (December 8, 2022). "The origins, characteristics and trends of neo-nationalism in the 21st century". International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology. 6 (1). doi:10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4. PMC 9735003. Archived from the original on February 23, 2024. Retrieved February 23, 2024. On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism.
  93. ^ Katzenstein, Peter J. (March 20, 2019). "Trumpism is US". WZB | Berlin Social Science Center. Retrieved September 11, 2021.
  94. ^ DiSalvo, Daniel (Fall 2022). "Party Factions and American Politics". National Affairs. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
  95. ^ Lowndes, Joseph (2019). "Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump". In de la Torre, Carlos (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London & New York: Routledge. "Trumpism" section, pp. 197–200. ISBN 978-1315226446. Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades.
  96. ^ Bennhold, Katrin (September 7, 2020). "Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  97. ^ Gardner, J.A.; Charles, G.U. (2023). Election Law in the American Political System. Aspen Casebook Series. Aspen Publishing. p. 31. ISBN 978-1-5438-2683-8. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  98. ^ Spiegeleire, Stephan De; Skinner, Clarissa; Sweijs, Tim (2017). The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From, and What It Means for International Security and Defense. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. ISBN 978-94-92102-59-1.
  99. ^ Chatelain, Ryan (March 10, 2023). "Freedom Caucus issues demands for raising debt limit". Spectrum News NY1. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  100. ^ Feagin, Joe R. (April 25, 2023). White Minority Nation: Past, Present and Future. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-86223-2.
  101. ^ Falk, Thomas O (November 8, 2023). "Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  102. ^ Riccardi, Nicholas (February 19, 2024). "Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia". Associated Press. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  103. ^ Lillis, Mike (February 28, 2024). "GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 28, 2024. Retrieved February 28, 2024. Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia.
  104. ^ Ball, Molly (February 23, 2024). "How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  105. ^ Jonathan, Chait (February 23, 2024). "Russian Dolls Trump has finally remade Republicans into Putin's playthings". Intelligencer. Retrieved February 28, 2024. But during his time in office and after, Trump managed to create, from the grassroots up, a Republican constituency for Russia-friendly policy ... Conservatives vying to be the Trumpiest of them all have realized that supporting Russia translates in the Republican mind as a proxy for supporting Trump. Hence the politicians most willing to defend his offenses against democratic norms — Marjorie Taylor Greene, Jim Jordan, Tommy Tuberville, Mike Lee, J. D. Vance — hold the most anti-Ukraine or pro-Russia views. Conversely, the least-Trumpy Republicans, such as Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney, have the most hawkish views on Russia. The rapid growth of Trump's once-unique pro-Russia stance is a gravitational function of his personality cult.
  106. ^ Lange, Jason (January 17, 2024). "Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed". Reuters. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  107. ^ Swan, Jonathan; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie (December 9, 2023). "Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power". New York Times. Retrieved December 10, 2023.
  108. ^ Baker, Peter (February 11, 2024). "Favoring Foes Over Friends, Trump Threatens to Upend International Order". The New York Times. ISSN 1553-8095. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  109. ^ Cohn, Nate (August 17, 2023). "The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 12, 2023. Retrieved October 9, 2023.
  110. ^ Collinson, Stephen (October 4, 2023). "McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution". CNN. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  111. ^ Rocha, Alander (September 7, 2023). "Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them'". AL. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  112. ^ Macpherson, James (July 24, 2021). "Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party". AP News. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  113. ^ "Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future". The Times Herald. May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
  114. ^ Baker, Paula; Critchlow, Donald T. (2020). The Oxford Handbook of American Political History. Oxford University Press. p. 387. ISBN 978-0190628697. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved April 23, 2021 – via Google Books. Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base.
  115. ^ Jones, Kent (2021). "Populism, Trade, and Trump's Path to Victory". Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0190086350.
  116. ^ Smith, Jordan Michael; Logis, Rich; Logis, Rich; Shephard, Alex; Shephard, Alex; Kipnis, Laura; Kipnis, Laura; Haas, Lidija; Haas, Lidija (October 17, 2022). "The Neocons Are Losing. Why Aren't We Happy?". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  117. ^ Arias-Maldonado, Manuel (January 2020). "Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism". Sustainability. 12 (6): 2538. doi:10.3390/su12062538. ISSN 2071-1050.
  118. ^ Isaac, Jeffrey (November 2017). "Making America Great Again?". Perspectives on Politics. 15 (3). Cambridge University Press: 625–631. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000871.
  119. ^ Blum, Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike (2024). "How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era". British Journal of Political Science. 54 (1). Cambridge University Press: 88–109. doi:10.1017/S0007123423000224. Retrieved December 31, 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  120. ^ Johnson, Lauren R.; McCray, Deon; Ragusa, Jordan M. (January 11, 2018). "#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election". Research & Politics. 5 (1). doi:10.1177/2053168017749383.
  121. ^ Swartz, David L. (May 27, 2022). "Trump divide among American conservative professors". Theory & Society. 52 (5): 739–769. doi:10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4. ISSN 1573-7853. PMC 10224651.
  122. ^ Will, George (June 22, 2018). "Opinion | Vote against the GOP this November". Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 16, 2018. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  123. ^ McLaughlin, Dan (June 25, 2018). "Don't Throw the Republicans Out: A Response to George Will". National Review. Archived from the original on June 25, 2018. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  124. ^ Feaver, Peter (November 5, 2020). "What Trump's Near-Victory Means for Republican Foreign Policy". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  125. ^ Elbeshbishi, Susan Page and Sarah. "Exclusive: Defeated and impeached, Trump still commands the loyalty of the GOP's voters". USA TODAY.
  126. ^ Stening, Tanner (May 26, 2022). "Do political endorsements still matter?". News @ Northeastern. Archived from the original on May 27, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  127. ^ Homans, Charles (March 17, 2022). "Where Does American Democracy Go From Here?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 17, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  128. ^ Kleinfeld, Rachel (September 15, 2022). "Five Strategies to Support U.S. Democracy". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original on September 15, 2022.
  129. ^ Ball, Molly (June 14, 2022). "How the 'MAGA Squad' Is Building Power to Control the Next Congress". Time. Retrieved November 15, 2022.
  130. ^ Alemany, Jacqueline; Sotomayor, Marianna; Dawsey, Josh (November 21, 2021). "A MAGA squad of Trump loyalists sees its influence grow amid demands for political purity among Republicans". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 15, 2022.
  131. ^ Bedayn, Jesse (November 11, 2022). "Trump loyalist Boebert's reelection bid could go to recount". ABC News. The Associated Press / Report for America. Retrieved November 15, 2022.
  132. ^ Itkowitz, Colby (December 26, 2021). "House MAGA squad seeks to expand by boosting challengers to fellow Republicans". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 15, 2022.
  133. ^ Edmondson, Catie (June 28, 2022). "In Illinois, MAGA Congresswoman Rallies to Oust Her G.O.P. Colleague". The New York Times.
  134. ^ Helderman, Rosalind S.; Abutaleb, Yasmeen (November 2, 2022). "Biden warns GOP could set nation on 'path to chaos' as democratic system faces strain". Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 3, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  135. ^ "THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER". Wiley Online Library. May 29, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
  136. ^ Lauter, David (February 14, 2021). "Loyalty to Trump remains the fault line for Republicans". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2021.
  137. ^ Dumcius, Gintautas. "Sen. John McCain backs up Mitt Romney, says Donald Trump's comments 'uninformed and indeed dangerous'", The Republican (March 3, 2016). Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  138. ^ "Republicans oust Rep. Liz Cheney from leadership over her opposition to Trump and GOP election lies". Business Insider. May 12, 2021.
  139. ^ Enten, Harry (August 24, 2022). "Analysis: Cheney's loss may be the second worst for a House incumbent in 60 years". CNN. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
  140. ^ "Kinzinger gets pro-Trump primary challenger". The Hill. February 25, 2021.
  141. ^ "Trump endorses Murkowski primary opponent Kelly Tshibaka". Fox News. June 18, 2021.
  142. ^ "Jason Chaffetz says he's open to challenging Mitt Romney in Utah Senate primary". Washington Examiner. February 16, 2021.
  143. ^ "Dear Republican Trump haters – What did you get for your trade?". Washington Times. August 16, 2021.
  144. ^ Martin, Jonathan (September 17, 2021). "Ohio House Republican, Calling Trump 'a Cancer,' Bows Out of 2022". The New York Times.
  145. ^ Colvin, Jill; Ramer, Holly (June 6, 2023). "Christie goes after Trump in presidential campaign launch, calling him a 'self-serving mirror hog'". ABC News.
  146. ^ Miller, Andrew (March 8, 2024). "Indiana GOP Sen. Todd Young renews his pledge not to support Trump in 2024". Fox News. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
  147. ^ Williams, Paige (October 5, 2020). "Inside the Lincoln Project's War Against Trump". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  148. ^ "Republican Attack Ads in Iowa Show Conservative Voters Who Turned on Trump". July 26, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  149. ^ "Republican group airs anti-Trump advert on Fox News". The Independent. May 12, 2020. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  150. ^ Howard, Victor B. (2015). Religion and the Radical Republican Movement, 1860–1870. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-6144-0. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  151. ^ Foner, Eric (1988). Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 (1st ed.). pp. 236–37.
  152. ^ "The Roots of Modern Conservatism | Michael Bowen". University of North Carolina Press. Archived from the original on May 22, 2017. Retrieved May 20, 2019.
  153. ^ Ashbee, Edward; Waddan, Alex (December 13, 2023). "US Republicans and the New Fusionism". The Political Quarterly. 95: 148–156. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13341. ISSN 1467-923X. S2CID 266282896.
  154. ^ Gottfried, Paul; Fleming, Thomas (1988). The Conservative Movement. Boston: Twayne Publishers. pp. 77–95. ISBN 0805797238.
  155. ^ Ward, Ian (August 26, 2022). "Trump Didn't Kill Reaganism. These Guys Did". Politico. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
  156. ^ Rathburn, Brian C. (Summer 2008). "Does One Right Make a Realist? Conservatism, Neoconservatism, and Isolationism in the Foreign Policy Ideology of American Elites". Political Science Quarterly. 123 (2): 271–299. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00625.x. ISSN 1538-165X.
  157. ^ Isaac, Jeffrey (November 2017). "Making America Great Again?". Perspectives on Politics. 15 (3). Cambridge University Press: 625–631. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000871.
  158. ^ Campani, Giovanna; Fabelo Concepción, Sunamis; Rodriguez Soler, Angel; Sánchez Savín, Claudia (December 2022). "The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse". Societies. 12 (6): 154. doi:10.3390/soc12060154. ISSN 2075-4698.
  159. ^ Broadwater, Luke (October 23, 2023). "'5 Families' and Factions Within Factions: Why the House G.O.P. Can't Unite". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 27, 2023. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
  160. ^ "The 8 Types Of Democrats And Republicans In The House". FiveThirtyEight. May 4, 2024.
  161. ^ Biebricher, Thomas (October 25, 2023). "The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective". Politische Vierteljahresschrift. doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2. ISSN 2075-4698.
  162. ^ Arhin, Kofi; Stockemer, Daniel; Normandin, Marie-Soleil (May 29, 2023). "THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other?". World Affairs. 186 (3). doi:10.1177/00438200231176818. ISSN 1940-1582. In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP).
  163. ^ Aratani, Lauren (February 26, 2021). "Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved February 8, 2024. In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.
  164. ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Sherman, Jake; Bresnahan, John (February 7, 2024). "The end of the Old GOP". Punchbowl News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2024. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
  165. ^ Johnson, Lauren R.; McCray, Deon; Ragusa, Jordan M. (January 11, 2018). "#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election". Research & Politics. 5 (1). doi:10.1177/2053168017749383.
  166. ^ Swartz, David L. (May 27, 2022). "Trump divide among American conservative professors". Theory & Society. 52 (5): 739–769. doi:10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4. ISSN 1573-7853. PMC 10224651. PMID 37362148.
  167. ^ "McCarthy elected House speaker in rowdy post-midnight vote". AP News. January 7, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
  168. ^ "Speaker McCarthy ousted in historic House vote, as scramble begins for a Republican leader". AP News. October 3, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
  169. ^ "Black and Tan Republicans" in Andrew Cunningham McLaughlin and Albert Bushnell Hart, eds. Cyclopedia of American Government (1914) . p. 133. online
  170. ^ Heersink, Boris; Jenkins, Jeffery A. (April 2020). "Whiteness and the Emergence of the Republican Party in the Early Twentieth-Century South". Studies in American Political Development. 34 (1): 71–90. doi:10.1017/S0898588X19000208. ISSN 0898-588X. S2CID 213551748.
  171. ^ a b Peskin, Allan (1984–1985). "Who Were the Stalwarts? Who Were Their Rivals? Republican Factions in the Gilded Age". Political Science Quarterly. 99 (4): 703–716. doi:10.2307/2150708. JSTOR 2150708.
  172. ^ Milkis, Sidney (October 4, 2016). "Theodore Roosevelt: Domestic Affairs". Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  173. ^ Arnold, Peri E. (October 4, 2016). "William Taft: Domestic Affairs". Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  174. ^ Wolfensberger, Don (December 12, 2018). "Opening day of new Congress: Not always total joy". The Hill. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  175. ^ Michael Wolraich. Unreasonable Men: Theodore Roosevelt and the Republican Rebels Who Created Progressive Politics (2014).
  176. ^ a b "Radical Republican". Archived from the original on November 6, 2017. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
  177. ^ Adrian Wooldridge and John Micklethwait. The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America (2004).
  178. ^ "Analysis: An autopsy of liberal Republicans - CNN.com". cnn.com. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  179. ^ "Blue wave that swamped New England endangers Yankee Republicans". The CT Mirror. November 16, 2018. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  180. ^ "Will Pennsylvania Loss Revive Rockefeller Republicans?". Christian Science Monitor. November 8, 1991. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  181. ^ Lind, Michael. Up From Conservatism. p. 263.
  182. ^ "How Watergate Helped Republicans—And Gave Us Trump".
  183. ^ "Stalwart". Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
  184. ^ Connolly, Katie (September 16, 2010). "What exactly is the Tea Party?". bbc.com. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  185. ^ Brown, Heath (February 24, 2017). "Do anti-Trump protests really compare to 2009 Tea Party?". TheHill. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  186. ^ Gallup: Tea Party's top concerns are debt, size of government The Hill, July 5, 2010
  187. ^ Somashekhar, Sandhya (September 12, 2010). Tea Party DC March: "Tea party activists march on Capitol Hill". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 5, 2011.
  188. ^ Good, Chris (October 6, 2010). "On Social Issues, Tea Partiers Are Not Libertarians". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  189. ^ Jonsson, Patrik (November 15, 2010). "Tea party groups push GOP to quit culture wars, focus on deficit". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  190. ^ Roy, Avik. April 7, 2012. The Tea Party's Plan for Replacing Obamacare. Forbes. Retrieved: March 6, 2015.
  191. ^ Somin, Ilya, The Tea Party Movement and Popular Constitutionalism (May 26, 2011). Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 105, p. 300, 2011 (Colloquy on the Constitutional Politics of the Tea Party Movement), George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11-22, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1853645
  192. ^ a b Mead, Walter Russell (March–April 2011). "The Tea Party and American Foreign Policy: What Populism Means for Globalism". Foreign Affairs. pp. 28–44.
  193. ^ "Boston Tea Party Is Protest Template". UPI. April 20, 2008.
  194. ^ Jossey, Paul H. (August 14, 2016). "How We Killed the Tea Party". POLITICO Magazine.
  195. ^ "Allen West joins congressional Tea Party Caucus". Sun Sentinel. February 7, 2011.
  196. ^ a b Lieb, David (August 6, 2012). "Tea party focused on coming GOP Senate primaries". The Tribune-Democrat. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  197. ^ "Exclusive Tim Scott Interview: No Racism in Tea Party". Blogs.cbn.com. September 21, 2010.
  198. ^ a b Rudin, Ken (July 30, 2012). "Latest Tea Party Vs. GOP Establishment Battle Comes Tuesday In Texas". NPR.org. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  199. ^ "Ted Cruz: His tea party background, positions on health care and taxes". mercurynews.com. Associated Press. February 3, 2016. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  200. ^ Herb, Jeremy (January 23, 2017). "Trump's tea party budget chief on collision course with GOP hawks". Politico.
  201. ^ Tea Party canvass results, Category: "What They Believe" A Party Face Washington Post October 24, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2022.
  202. ^ Green, Joshua (August 5, 2011). "The Tea Party's Brain". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on October 23, 2012. Retrieved June 12, 2022.
  203. ^ Williams, Juan (May 10, 2011). "The Surprising Rise of Rep. Ron Paul". Fox News.

Further reading

  • Barone, Michael and Richard E. Cohen. The Almanac of American Politics, 2010 (2009). 1,900 pages of minute, nonpartisan detail on every state and district and member of Congress.
  • Baker, Peter, and Susan Glasser. The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021 (2022) excerpt
  • Dyche, John David. Republican Leader: A Political Biography of Senator Mitch McConnell (2009).
  • Edsall, Thomas Byrne. Building Red America: The New Conservative Coalition and the Drive For Permanent Power (2006). Sophisticated analysis by liberal.
  • Crane, Michael. The Political Junkie Handbook: The Definitive Reference Book on Politics (2004). Nonpartisan.
  • Frank, Thomas. What's the Matter with Kansas (2005). Attack by a liberal.
  • Frohnen, Bruce, Beer, Jeremy and Nelson, Jeffery O., eds. American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia (2006). 980 pages of articles by 200 conservative scholars.
  • Hamburger, Tom and Peter Wallsten. One Party Country: The Republican Plan for Dominance in the 21st Century (2006). Hostile.
  • Hemmer, Nicole. Partisans: The Conservative Revolutionaries Who Remade American Politics in the 1990s (2022)
  • Hewitt, Hugh. GOP 5.0: Republican Renewal Under President Obama (2009).
  • Ross, Brian. "The Republican Un-Civil War – The Neocons and the Tea Party Fight for Control of the GOP" (August 9, 2012). Truth-2-Power.
  • Wooldridge, Adrian and John Micklethwait. The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America (2004). Sophisticated nonpartisan analysis.
  • "A Guide to the Republican Herd" (October 5, 2006). The New York Times.
  • "Belief Spectrum Brings Party Splits" (October 4, 1998). The Washington Post.