Talk:List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in 2024: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1222150688 by InfoWiki01 (talk)
m {{Further|Talk:2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses|label1=For a comprehensive view of how the Talk Page looked like prior to the article split, see "Talk:2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses"}}
Tag: Reverted
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Further|Talk:2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses|label1=For a comprehensive view of how the Talk Page looked like prior to the article split, see "[[Talk:2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses]]"}}

{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement}}
{{ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement}}

Revision as of 06:08, 4 May 2024

That is bold

My instinct was to WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT, but given you are a main contributor who also created the original article I'm refraining. Personally I think an East/West split of lists would of been more appropriate, as I don't see this article solving the problem (it's still at 8,000 words). CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ElijahPepe and CommunityNotesContributor: nice work. :) Boud (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was expecting a WP:TROUT prior to a compliment. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest separating by within the United States and outside of it, and further subdivide into states, such as "2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in California" or "2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in Massachusetts". elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True, this can all come later if the article expands (similar to George Floyd protest articles). Hence supporting current split for now. Hard to tell whether it'll need state splits or international split as of yet. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are four interstate regions of the US (West, Midwest, South, Northeast) per the US Census Bureau that should be an uncontroversial geographical division for a further split if someone is bold enough. Since to some degree these correspond to various shades in the US political spectrum, these may also turn out to be useful sociologically, although that will only be in WP:RS in the distant future, so cannot be an argument right now. (The only drawback is that most of the inter-region boundaries do not look like rivers, so there won't be much opportunity for WP:TROUT awards.) Boud (talk) 00:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I like the idea of a four-way split as suggested for the future, sounds logical. It can always expand state-by-state beyond that if the content increases beyond reasonable thresholds. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 00:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]