User talk:FMSky: Difference between revisions
→Tupac changes: new section |
Rishabmalu (talk | contribs) →Overview & InfoBox Vandalism: new section |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I edited Tupac's lead using sources that contained the opinion of an academic, what's more even an administrator told me that I have good sources. Why consider this a puffery? I have tons of other academic sources that describe Tupac as both a very influential activist and one of the most influential artists of the 20th century. Wikipedia should be a page of information, not a page of personal ideas. Just as it is written to other artists in the lead that they are among the most influential artists of the last century, it must also be written to Tupac. If not, what are academics for? Tupac was a very influential figure culturally and in various fields. [[User:Pier1999|Pier1999]] ([[User talk:Pier1999|talk]]) 10:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
I edited Tupac's lead using sources that contained the opinion of an academic, what's more even an administrator told me that I have good sources. Why consider this a puffery? I have tons of other academic sources that describe Tupac as both a very influential activist and one of the most influential artists of the 20th century. Wikipedia should be a page of information, not a page of personal ideas. Just as it is written to other artists in the lead that they are among the most influential artists of the last century, it must also be written to Tupac. If not, what are academics for? Tupac was a very influential figure culturally and in various fields. [[User:Pier1999|Pier1999]] ([[User talk:Pier1999|talk]]) 10:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Overview & InfoBox Vandalism == |
|||
Overview should only summarise the filmography. Hit or Flop should be under "career" section of the page. Coming to the InfoBox, don’t edit out Information without providing a valid reason. [[User:Rishabmalu|Rishabmalu]] ([[User talk:Rishabmalu|talk]]) 07:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:53, 21 April 2024
| This is FMSky's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 10.5 days  |
Confusing edit
Why did you change the genres to not be in alphabetical order and change the last album to be inaccurate here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cometh_the_Storm&diff=0&oldid=1219842174 ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Tupac changes
I edited Tupac's lead using sources that contained the opinion of an academic, what's more even an administrator told me that I have good sources. Why consider this a puffery? I have tons of other academic sources that describe Tupac as both a very influential activist and one of the most influential artists of the 20th century. Wikipedia should be a page of information, not a page of personal ideas. Just as it is written to other artists in the lead that they are among the most influential artists of the last century, it must also be written to Tupac. If not, what are academics for? Tupac was a very influential figure culturally and in various fields. Pier1999 (talk) 10:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Overview & InfoBox Vandalism
Overview should only summarise the filmography. Hit or Flop should be under "career" section of the page. Coming to the InfoBox, don’t edit out Information without providing a valid reason. Rishabmalu (talk) 07:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)