User talk:TimothyBlue: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Szturnek (talk | contribs)
If you want to discuss at all, leave my answers alone
Tag: Reverted
→‎Re: Kraków Uprising 2: non-answers, you need to reply in the discussion that was started on your talk page
Line 393: Line 393:
|} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
|} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 -->

== Re: Kraków Uprising 2 ==

1. If we consider that uprisings count as war, then all of them. If not, why is the [[November Uprising]] included on the list? <br/>
2. Yes - I think it meets [[WP:LISTCRITERIA]].<br/>
2.1 [[:pl:WP:WER|WP:V]] is of course fulfilled - I provided so many verifiable sources that I don't know how you still insist that this uprising is unverifiable. [[User:Szturnek|<span style="color:#05a81e;">'''Szturnek'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Szturnek|<span style="color:#008080;">¿?</span>]]</sub> 16:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Also this uprising is support of entry - this isn't a "peacekeeping operations (such as UNPROFOR, UNTAES or UNMOP), humanitarian missions or training missions supported by the Polish Armed Forces." so it can be mentionen in list. [[User:Szturnek|<span style="color:#05a81e;">'''Szturnek'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Szturnek|<span style="color:#008080;">¿?</span>]]</sub> 16:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

: 1. Is the rule, that you have to reply on your own talk page, a written rule of the en wiki, or your own? If this is just your rule, then sorry, but I won't follow it because I'm too used to the rules from the pl wiki.<br/>
: 2. Becose?<br/>
: 3. And why you deleting my comments? Do you love deleting everything so much that you even delete dissenting comments? xD[[User:Szturnek|<span style="color:#05a81e;">'''Szturnek'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Szturnek|<span style="color:#008080;">¿?</span>]]</sub> 17:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

:: 1. Prove me, that I can reply to your's comment only on my disscusion page. Show me the rule. If this rule isn't write - I won't be follow. And don't delete my comments (even if the rule about replies is real) because you spoil the whole point of the discussion.
:: 2. Which criteria exactly do you have on the mind? Verifiability - all of them. Justify that the event was significant - sources 5 to 9. Something another - just write it. [[User:Szturnek|<span style="color:#05a81e;">'''Szturnek'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Szturnek|<span style="color:#008080;">¿?</span>]]</sub> 17:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:49, 17 April 2024

SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

WikiBreak Notice Welcome to my Talk Page
If we have a difference of opinion, I'm open to discussing it if the issue is meaningful, significant and worth my time. I ignore comments containing hyperbole, profanity, nonsense, attacks, and attitudes/behaviors I personally find offensive; I also ignore ones that I don't think are worth the time to respond. If you do not like this, click here. I have very strong feelings about the importance of notability, policies and guidelines, sources and evidence.
Best wishes from Los Angeles,   // Timothy :: talk