Talk:Safflower: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Plants}}, {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject Abortion}}.
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=no|1=
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=Mid}}

Revision as of 09:50, 13 April 2024

Edible Oil

This section states the important fact that there are two kind of this oil with very different primary fatty acids, and notes that the high-oleic kind is currently the predominant one in the edible oil market. Following this is a table showing fatty acid composition without identifying which kind it is for, which is in fact it is for the non-predominent high-linoleic kind. This is very misleading. I've modified the title of this table with "high-linoleic" and added a table with the rough fatty acid composition of the high-oleic kind. It is not as detailed as the first table, coming from only one source and so not offering a min/max range, and only including the major fatty acid components, but it at least clears up what was previously grossly misleading. It could be improved later. --Ericjs (talk) 01:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]