Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion: Difference between revisions
DeIIveloper (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Monument Mythos}} |
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Monument Mythos}} |
||
===April 12, 2024=== |
===April 12, 2024=== |
||
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Monument Mythos}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Doucet, Quebec}} |
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Doucet, Quebec}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Existence operating systems}} |
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Existence operating systems}} |
Revision as of 01:50, 13 April 2024
Skip to: Table of contents / current discussions / old business (bottom). |
Please do not nominate your user page (or subpages of it) for deletion here. Instead, add {{db-userreq}} at the top of any such page you no longer wish to keep; an administrator will then delete the page. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for more information. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.
Filtered versions of the page are available at
Information on the process
What may be nominated for deletion here:
- Pages not covered by other XFD venues, including pages in these namespaces: Draft:, Help:, Portal:, MediaWiki:, Wikipedia: (including WikiProjects), User:, TimedText: and the various Talk: namespaces
- Userboxes (regardless of namespace)
- Pages in the File namespace that have a local description page but no local file (if there is a local file, Wikipedia:Files for discussion is the right venue)
- Any other page, that is not in article space, where there is dispute as to the correct XfD venue.
Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.
Before nominating a page for deletion
Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:
Deleting pages in your own userspace |
|
Duplications in draftspace? |
|
Deleting pages in other people's userspace |
|
Policies, guidelines and process pages |
|
WikiProjects and their subpages |
|
Alternatives to deletion |
|
Alternatives to MfD |
|
Please familiarize yourself with the following policies
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy – our deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus
- Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on how to list anything for deletion
- Wikipedia:Guide to deletion – a how-to guide whose protocols on discussion format and shorthands also apply here
- Wikipedia:Project namespace – our guidelines on "Wikipedia" namespace pages
- Wikipedia:User page – our guidelines on user pages and user subpages
- Wikipedia:Userboxes – our guideline on userboxes
How to list pages for deletion
Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:
Instructions on listing pages for deletion:
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To list a page for deletion, follow this three-step process: (replace PageName with the name of the page, including its namespace, to be deleted) Note: Users must be logged in to complete step II. An unregistered user who wishes to nominate a page for deletion should complete step I and post their reasoning on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion with a notification to a registered user to complete the process.
|
Administrator instructions
V | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 18 | 14 | 32 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
MfD | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 17 | 59 | 76 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.
Archived discussions
A list of archived discussions can be located at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates.
Current discussions
- Pages currently being considered for deletion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed. Please place new listings at the top of the section for the current day. If no section for the current day is present, please start a new section.
April 13, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Monument Mythos |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 23:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Draft:The Monument MythosPerson who created subject requests deletion of the draft. DeIIveloper (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 12, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Monument Mythos |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 23:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Draft:The Monument MythosPerson who created subject requests deletion of the draft. DeIIveloper (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Doucet, Quebec |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 11:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Draft:Doucet, QuebecThis place does not appear to exist. I couldn't find it in the Canadian Geographical Names Database ([1]). There are a number of places or features called Lac-Doucet, but the only one that is a place (and not a geographical feature) is located at 46° 28′ 4″ N, 72° 38′ 23″ W, which is near Trois-Rivieres, neither north nor west. But notwithstanding not being able to find it on a map, I did find a source for the claimed coldest temperature record ([2]) which we've repeated (unsourced) in other articles, which seems like it warrants further investigation. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Existence operating systems |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Draft:Existence operating systems"Draft template" created by an anonymous IP, with no obvious explanation of what it would be used for. The text of it is "If i better operating system is needed, please add, copy and paste your template source page", but it's rather unclear what operating systems and template code have to do with each other, so it's not clear what purpose pasting your template source page anywhere would serve, and the template fails to explain where your template source page is to be pasted.
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mengbi |
---|
The result of the discussion was: procedural close. Wrong venue. AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mengbi (non-admin closure) —Alalch E. 10:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC) MengbiAfter conducting a search, I found that the location you mentioned ceased to exist. In November 2015, Mengbi Township and Shuitianba Township were administratively merged to form Shuitianba Town. Therefore, this location no longer exists. I believe this entry meets Wikipedia's deletion policy, specifically criterion ten: Redundant or otherwise useless templates. Hence, I suggest deleting this entry. WYRRRR (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 11, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HansWobbe/Books/SrEd References |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. A consensus against deletion clearly exists at this time. North America1000 05:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) User:HansWobbe/Books/SrEd References
This is a grab bag deletion of discussion regarding a network of related pages created by banned User:HansWobbe. This is discussion is focused on his "lightly edited template pages", which I feel have a good case for deletion given they probably fall under WP:UP#GOALS. Most of these seem to have been in an effort ot make a Wikipedia book (a now depricated feature). I'm doing this so I don't have to open an MfD for all of these articles, and will list them below:
Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate CCP |
---|
The result of the discussion was: reword and rename. There is a consensus that this userbox is not appropriate as it is. There is, however, no consensus to delete it. Voters split exactly halfway between wanting to delete it and wanting to keep it in some form. Personally, I find arguments that this userbox violates WP:SOAPBOX and WP:UPNOT compelling, but cannot find a consensus to delete solely on this basis when the global consensus is that political userboxes are okay when not incendiary. Obviously, there is a consensus that this one is incendiary; more than three quarters of participants expressed this opinion. A majority took exception specifically to the word "hate" rather than the general practice of expressing dislike toward something political. Because there was no consensus to delete and those who supported deletion will probably support it as a second choice, I find a consensus to reword this userbox. I have chosen the word "opposes," although if anybody wants to replace it with something else, that is fine, as long as it is similarly inoffensive. I will leave a note on each transcluder's talk page informing them of this change so that they may further modify the template and/or their user page as they desire. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Template:User hate CCPWP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC. Divisive userbox. Broc (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 10, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp |
---|
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete. The mainspace redirect will be recreated for proper discussion. BD2412 T 16:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Talk:QazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolpThis subpage isn't useful, despite the tag on it. Highly implausible query. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 17:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 9, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Minato Aqua |
---|
The result of the discussion was: move to draftspace. We aren't quite at seven days yet, but consensus is clear and this seems uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) Queen of ♡ | speak 19:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Minato AquaWrong namespace but not sure if it should be deleted or moved to mainspace. Isla🏳️⚧ 22:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 7, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:MAIN PAGE |
---|
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:MAIN PAGEPurppose unknown, but created 1 April. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 6, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kieronoldham/Userboxes/PeloCortado | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. No prejudice against SmokeyJoe's proposal, but there is a pretty clear consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) Queen of ♡ | speak 19:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC) User:Kieronoldham/Userboxes/PeloCortado
All userboxes should be governed by the civility policy, something this one appears to be violating due to sexism. Saying "This user does not prefer (or does prefer) to wear short or braided hair" or "This user prefers to wear their hair long" would be fine, but this specific statement about a given user's perspective on women in general is not appropriate, and should not be hosted by Wikipedia. The formatting additionally raises visibility concerns per MOS:COLOR. TNstingray (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No offense was intended. Regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 4, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Windows Server 2025/System Requirements |
---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 14:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Draft:Windows Server 2025/System Requirements
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. This draft, while not an article, violates that rule. thetechie@wikimedia: ~/talk/ $ 22:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Old business
Everything below this point is old business; the 7-day review period that began 01:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC) ended today on 19 May 2024. Editors may continue to add comments until the discussion is closed but they should keep in mind that the discussion below this marker may be closed at any time without further notice. Discussions that have already been closed will be removed from the page automatically by Legobot and need no further action. |
April 4, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:System Requirements for MS-DOS Based Windows Versions (2nd nomination) | ||
---|---|---|
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 14:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Draft:System Requirements for MS-DOS Based Windows Versions
Wikipedia is clearly not a how-to guide, it's an encyclopedia. This draft, while not an article, violates that rule. It is also trying to be a collection of information and a manual, which is not allowed. Pretty sure that's also for drafts, last time I checked. thetechie@wikimedia: ~/talk/ $ 22:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 3, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Voting for busy beavers |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Userfy to User:Incnis Mrsi/Voting for busy beavers. (non-admin closure) NasssaNser 14:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Voting for busy beaversI don't even remember how I came across this essay, but I am a little dumbfounded by it. It advocates for keeping a list of trusted contributors (called the "White List") and a group of not trusted contributors (called the "Black List"). It then calls for !voting on RfAs/RfBs/RfCs based on how they were supported by people on the "White List"/"Black List", without considering the merits of the candidate/issue. If you are so busy that you cannot consider a proposal/candidate on the merits, ignore the discussion. Don't !vote a certain way because of how people on your "White List"/"Black List" !voted. I don't necessarily think this needs deletion, but it certainly needs userfication. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
|
April 1, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (21st nomination) |
---|
The result of the discussion was: consensus to title blacklist, no consensus to delete. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (21st nomination)
Trying to finally put a stop to this. DrowssapSMM 12:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete, it stopped being fun. Adding the above regular expression to the title blacklist will help. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
|
February 22, 2024
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Brion Vibber Interviews |
---|
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete. The arguments from those in favor of keeping the article based on its value as a redirect were not sufficiently rebutted, and since those look to be the prevailing argument, I've gone ahead and just made this one a redirect of my own accord. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Brion Vibber InterviewsAncient junk from 2006 of no actual historical value. If kept rename to Wikipedia:Brooke Vibber interviews. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
|