Jump to content

Talk:Long Beach Township, New Jersey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pengua (talk | contribs)
Sock discussion deleted
Tag: Reverted
m Reverted edit by Pengua (talk) to last version by Powerplay44
Tags: Rollback Reverted
Line 45: Line 45:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

{{Closed rfc top}}

== List of Guarded Beaches ==

Per a consensus on the LBTBP Deletion Discussion page, the List of Guarded Beaches in Long Beach Township, as well as other pertinent information regarding the LBTBP, was merged here. The list was later deleted roughly on the basis that it was excessive. I would like to see if the list should be added back. I invite anyone who is interested to take a look and give their opinion on the matter. It would be greatly appreciated if we could reach a consensus by November 21, 2023. Best, [[User:Powerplay44|Powerplay44]] ([[User talk:Powerplay44|talk]]) 00:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

*'''Include the List.''' Based on comments citing the list’s notability from Deletion Discussion for the LBTBP and the potential usefulness of this information, I believe that it should be included under the Recreation section with the rest of the information regarding the beach patrol. Moreover, similar lists should be added to other town pages on LBI. [[Special:Contributions/76.117.162.190|76.117.162.190]] ([[User talk:76.117.162.190|talk]]) 01:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
*'''Exclude the List''' This list of more than 50 guarded beach locations copied and pasted from [https://lbtbp.com/guarded-beach-locations/ this source] has no encyclopedic value of any kind and is the cardinal example of [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY|Wikipedia is not a directory]]. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long_Beach_Township,_New_Jersey&diff=prev&oldid=1184870109 this edit] for an example of how the laundry list of beaches would appear in the article. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 03:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
* '''Include the List''' The list is rather encyclopedic in this context, and consequently does not resemble a directory per Wikipedia’s guidelines. It also adds value to the section about the patrol. I see no problem with the way it was accurately transferred from the source. [[Special:Contributions/2601:84:C900:BCC0:C2A:7896:892D:B378|2601:84:C900:BCC0:C2A:7896:892D:B378]] ([[User talk:2601:84:C900:BCC0:C2A:7896:892D:B378#top|talk]]) 22:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
*'''Include the List''' Looking at the LBTBP’s Deletion Discussion, it does appear that this list was intended for inclusion in the merge. It should be added back to the Recreation section of the article. [[User:AlleghenyPA|AlleghenyPA]] ([[User talk:AlleghenyPA|talk]]) 22:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
* '''Include the List.''' As others have said, the information seemingly was to be merged from the deletion discussion. The list provides value to that section of the article, is encyclopedic per Wikipedia’s guidelines, and is accurately cited and transferred to this page. [[User:Handstain|Handstain]] ([[User talk:Handstain|talk]]) 22:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems that there is a consensus to '''Include the List''' of Guarded Beaches by the LBTBP under the “Recreation” section of the article with the rest of the patrol information. I thank all who participated in this discussion. Have a Happy Thanksgiving, [[User:Powerplay44|Powerplay44]] ([[User talk:Powerplay44|talk]]) 00:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

{{Closed rfc bottom}}

Revision as of 21:34, 13 December 2023

WikiProject iconCities C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconNew Jersey C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Communities

I added the communities of Long Beach Township, since they tend to operate as individual entities; and are commonly referred to as such by the locals to Long Beach Island. --Thisisbossi 22:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fragmented

I added the part about fragmentation. I'm not sure how to cite source -- look at the map already on the page! It shows the four fragments. I used the National Geographic Road Atlas and Google Maps to verify which places within the Township are in which of the four fragments.

The article on South Hackensack cites that township's uniqueness in being fragmented in three parts, but doesn't cite Long Beach and its four. Isdnip (talk) 17:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)User:isdnip[reply]

The {{fact}} tag isn't about this township in itself being fragmented: yes, geography is a good enough reference for that one. Rather, the {{fact}} tag is with regards to the statement that Long Beach Township is the only township in Jersey which is fragmented. And actually, now that you pointed out South Hackensack, you just demonstrated that the last statement is not entirely accurate. If you can find a source which states that, at four sections, it is the most fragmented township -- I suppose that could be added back in. In the meantime, I have removed the last statement. --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 19:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reason I added the "fact" tag is not that I think its false (I'm well familiar with the case of South Hackensack), but that the definitive and superlative nature of the statement required sources. It might well be true, but I'm not sure how other municipalities, especially where islands are included, may be considered in this regard, so I thought the tag should be applied. I'd have no objection to its inclusion with a fact tag, but we should be able to find a source. Alansohn (talk) 19:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Long Beach Township, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Long Beach Township, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the discussion.

List of Guarded Beaches

Per a consensus on the LBTBP Deletion Discussion page, the List of Guarded Beaches in Long Beach Township, as well as other pertinent information regarding the LBTBP, was merged here. The list was later deleted roughly on the basis that it was excessive. I would like to see if the list should be added back. I invite anyone who is interested to take a look and give their opinion on the matter. It would be greatly appreciated if we could reach a consensus by November 21, 2023. Best, Powerplay44 (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Include the List. Based on comments citing the list’s notability from Deletion Discussion for the LBTBP and the potential usefulness of this information, I believe that it should be included under the Recreation section with the rest of the information regarding the beach patrol. Moreover, similar lists should be added to other town pages on LBI. 76.117.162.190 (talk) 01:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exclude the List This list of more than 50 guarded beach locations copied and pasted from this source has no encyclopedic value of any kind and is the cardinal example of Wikipedia is not a directory. See this edit for an example of how the laundry list of beaches would appear in the article. Alansohn (talk) 03:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Include the List The list is rather encyclopedic in this context, and consequently does not resemble a directory per Wikipedia’s guidelines. It also adds value to the section about the patrol. I see no problem with the way it was accurately transferred from the source. 2601:84:C900:BCC0:C2A:7896:892D:B378 (talk) 22:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Include the List Looking at the LBTBP’s Deletion Discussion, it does appear that this list was intended for inclusion in the merge. It should be added back to the Recreation section of the article. AlleghenyPA (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Include the List. As others have said, the information seemingly was to be merged from the deletion discussion. The list provides value to that section of the article, is encyclopedic per Wikipedia’s guidelines, and is accurately cited and transferred to this page. Handstain (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that there is a consensus to Include the List of Guarded Beaches by the LBTBP under the “Recreation” section of the article with the rest of the patrol information. I thank all who participated in this discussion. Have a Happy Thanksgiving, Powerplay44 (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.