Share
Preview
 
 

Hello ,

Today I’m dusting off my trusted crystal ball to explore what the future of telehealth holds. I’ve been “wrong” before in some of my predictions on telehealth, but just like you can’t win when you are not playing, you cannot be right if you never venture to take a guess.

The topic at hand? Inspired by one of your fellow Telehealth Tuesday Readers, I am today sharing my thoughts on what the future holds for telehealth and how to transition into the new future.

More specifically, what are the operational implications of weaving together a healthcare delivery model that combines in-person care with care at a distance?

I very much welcome your perspectives on this topic - either in a direct reply to me, as a comment on the LinkedIn version of the article or on the newly launched “Telehealth Community” where I’ll be posting a prompt about this shortly.

None of us will be 100% right and none of us will be 100% wrong. But all of us together will bring many of the facets to the discussion that by ourselves we would have overlooked.



With kind regards,

P.S.: Do you know a colleague who might enjoy reading this newsletter? Please send them this link to see an archive of past newsletters and an opportunity to subscribe:
Free Resources
Telehealth and Covid-19


Weekly Open Forums: Access to Ingenium’s Telehealth Experts
Initiated by a German engineer who spent 12 years at the Mayo Clinic improving healthcare delivery, Ingenium Healthcare Advisors is a consortium of 11 pragmatic advisors each with decades of experience in healthcare delivery, particularly the implementation of telehealth solutions. We bring the deep and broad expertise in telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, eICU, telehealth technology, regulatory, legislative, billing, marketing, change management, etc.

As a service to our colleagues in the industry, we are offering free Open Forums for healthcare practitioners and leaders to get their questions about telehealth answered and receive pragmatic advice on best practices when standing up a new telemedicine service quickly.

You can register here:
http://tiny.cc/ing-th-cov19-sessions

MGMA Webinar: Rapidly Launching, then Optimizing Telehealth
As practices respond to new telehealth legislation amidst #COVID19, effective implementation processes, while crucial, can prove overwhelming.

In this 1-hour webinar, hosted by the MGMA, now available on demand, Christian Milaster and Kathy Letendre of Ingenium Digital Health will share key steps for rapid launch, as well as optimization strategies to ensure that your services are clinically and financially sound in this quickly evolving healthcare climate:

Register here for free access to this webinar:
https://www.mgma.com/resources/continuing-education/products/standing-up-a-telehealth-practice-in-the-covid-(2)  

Contact Us
To schedule a complimentary Zoom call to find out how we can best help you and your organization, email Christian at christian@ingeniumdigitalhealth.com  or call 657-464-3648.
 
Hybrid Care Delivery: The Best of Both Worlds
The delivery of care is one of the last domains to be taken “online”.

30 years ago most banking transactions were conducted in a bank. 20 years ago most trips were booked in travel agencies. 15 years ago most books, electronics and other goods were purchased in stores. And 10 years ago most of us hailed a taxi by waving our hands in the air or calling one of those memorable numbers.

But the delivery of care, seeing a doctor? For that we still had to schlep ourselves into the dreaded waiting rooms, fighting traffic, parking lots and elevators along the way. All for what took 7 minutes at best to accomplish, save the small talk with the nurse and the needle prick (or worse).

Yet telehealth has been around for as long as distance communication has been available: In 1958 the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota received an EKG from Australia via a rudimentary data transmission system. The EKG was read and the assessment phoned (or telegraphed) back to Australia. Telehealth at its finest (for 1958).

In 1968, the designated physician in charge of covering the Boston Logan airport was tired of having to drive from Mass General to the airport for his shift (even then, Boston traffic was undesirable) and subsequently engineers installed an “interactive television microwave link that provided electrocardiograph, stethoscope, microscopy, voice, and other capabilities”. TeleExams at their finest (for 1968).

And the list goes on and on. The University of Virginia, just to highlight one modern success story, has been running a strong telehealth program for 25 years since 1995, now practicing medicine at a distance across at least 60 specialties at over 150 partner sites.

In the 17 years that I’ve been in the field, starting with a continuous heart rhythm monitor developed at the Mayo Clinic, advances in telehealth have been slow at best. In 2012 a resounding success meant ramping from 0 to 500 telehealth visits a year across eight different specialties.

A Black Swan: The Covid-19 Health Crisis

That all changed in March 2020 with the world-wide pandemic and the subsequent mandated social distancing measures. While on site with a client in rural Vermont (working on said slow rollout of telehealth) we launched telehealth within 2 days, ramping from 0 to 600 visits a day (!) in less than 10 days.

The need (and desire) for physical distancing has definitely brought telemedicine into the spotlight and a good number of healthcare organizations, namely those who had already invested in dipping their toes into the virtual care water, have done a great job in expanding their capacity and quickly rolling out “true” telemedicine (i.e., the use of live audio/video vs. telephonic audio-only interactions).

But many are struggling and we are hearing numbers as high as 99% phone-only visits. Others still remain hesitant to explore the use of true telemedicine via a live audio/video feed. For those organizations I’ve written extensively in the past about a great telehealth launch checklist and the six hallmarks of telehealth success.

A Brave new (Hybrid) World

As the initial frenzy of launching and optimizing telehealth services is waning, it is becoming increasingly obvious to those “having ordinary skill in the art”, that telehealth, as as a care delivery mechanism, is not only here to stay, but will have to become an integral part of the incumbent healthcare delivery system if said system is to survive the next 5 years with its current business model.

Just like the 2008 financial crisis gave birth to a whole set of companies and technologies that are now household names (Uber, AirBnB, Instagram, iPhone, etc.), so too the Covid-19 health crisis will by 2021 have catapulted a whole new set of companies into the consciousness of the broader public. And we need to remind ourselves that those companies that emerged in 2008 displaced a whole set of established players (Blackberry anyone?) that felt quite safe at the time.

Thus the best strategy is to look forward about 12 months and determine how this “virtual only” world that many healthcare organizations are now operating under, can graciously morph into a hybrid model, where care is delivered in-person as well as at a distance.
Telehealth is A Clinical Tool

We have long maintained that telehealth is not a technology, not a stand-alone service, but rather a clinical tool. It’s a tool available to clinicians to deliver care, just like prescribing medications or referring patients to physical therapy are clinical tools to facilitate the speedy and sustained recovery of patients.

At times telehealth may be a good, an appropriate tool and other times it may not. It’s neither a panacea nor is it a modern technology to be shunned. Sticking one’s head in the sand is not going to make telehealth blow over. What is needed is a strategy that guides the effective use of telehealth when appropriate while leaving room and support for the traditional in-person care delivery.

In the upcoming weeks and months I will cover this and related topics as I continue to work with forward thinking leaders who would rather create the future than having it thrust upon them. For now let me jump back into pragmatism.

Operational Considerations While Re-Opening Practices

From the beginning of the Covid-19 health crisis, the safety of the patients, the safety of the clinicians and the safety of the staff was always on everyone’s mind as virtually everybody turned to telehealth as a solution. Now that we understand how infectious the disease is even without symptoms and in the absence of reliable treatment for those people severely affected by the virus, it is more important than ever to continue to keep everyone safe.

While we averted projected doomsday scenarios of severe shortages, given the increasing numbness and fatigue surrounding the distancing and personal protection measures (like wearing a mask in public or washing your hands to two renditions of “Happy Birthday”) a second wave of high infection rates is quite feasible and we need to stay vigilant to keep everyone safe.

Yet there are practical limitations to the volume that an in-person practice can effectively handle. For one, physical distancing best practices require that we should not create unnecessary high volumes at any of the bottlenecks - registration, waiting room, check out, etc. Furthermore there is the consideration of potential limited availability of hospital-grade personal protective equipment.

Given these constraints, here are five recommendations on how to best organize a hybrid in-person and virtual care practice:

  1. Staggered schedules: Stagger your in-clinic physicians by enabling half of them to work remotely from home where feasible or clean, safe, alternative work locations. You can schedule clinicians alternatingly for half-day or full-day shifts.

  2. Optimizing use of staff: Clinical and administrative support staff, when properly set up and trained for remote work, can also perform many supportive tasks from home, such as Telemedicine TechChecks, vital-sign collection and Medication reconciliation.

  3. Batch scheduling: While pre-Covid-19 for some practices I favored the “interlaced” scheduling model where telehealth visits are “sprinkled” throughout the schedule, during Covid-19 I strongly recommend batching all in-person visits and all telehealth visits.

  4. Built-in buffer times: While your volumes are still below peak, we recommend to build in additional buffer times between visits. For in-person visits this time must be used to account for personal hygiene (such as hand-washing or changing gowns or replacing face masks) but also for the additional time patients need to “make it” to the exam room. For telehealth visits this time can be used to finalize the clinical notes and to also account for the occasional tardy patient. Once volume is back at peak level, most should have worked out any tweaks and the buffers can be shortened or altogether eliminated.

  5. Minimizing Virtual Wait Times: Waiting in the clinics’ waiting rooms (with their infamous magazines) is annoying enough; having to sit in front of a computer staring at a video of yourself (when you could be folding your laundry or emptying the dishwasher - Ha!) is even more annoying. Just like with any customer experience improvement, communication is key. If the physician is running behind, a designated staff needs to call the patient and let them know and give patients the option to be called when the physician is 5 minutes out. If restaurants can give you a buzzer, so can modern healthcare providers.

The Key Success Factors for Hybrid Care Delivery

In closing, I want to remind you that the basic principles of excellent telehealth design and implementation still apply when designing and implementing a hybrid care delivery system.

  1. Care delivery is a workflow challenge and given the new world where PPE and distancing is here to stay for about a year, the workflows for scheduling, pre-visit, visit, and post-visit need to be defined for both, the in-person and the virtual visits.

  2. Users need to be trained - on the workflows and on the technology. And they need to have access to qualified support.

  3. First and foremost, moving into a hybrid model requires a lot of change on top of the uncertainty, anxiety and fatigue. Thus a vigilant focus on organizational change management is critical in order to be successful.

What is your organization considering regarding the re-opening of clinics? Will you continue to let people work from home? Is your volume back to pre-Covid-19 levels? Let me know through any of the options below.
Send me your comments by replying to this email.

Christian Milaster is the Founder and CEO of Ingenium Digital Health where he and his expert advisors partner with healthcare leaders to optimize the delivery of care.
To discuss how you can use telehealth to optimize the delivery of care, contact Christian by phone or text (657-464-3648), email, or video chat.

         Like or share this article with others on LinkedIn: tiny.cc/ing-hybrid-care
 
This edition of Telehealth Tuesday was sent to _t.e.s.t_@example.com.
Ingenium Consulting Group, Inc., 1173 Bayview Vis, Annapolis, MD 21409, United States
If you no longer wish to receive weekly updates, I'm sorry to see you go. Unsubscribe


Email Marketing by ActiveCampaign